• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How long will you "blame Bush"?

How long will you blame Bush

  • Less than one more year

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Until this term is over

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    32
Status
Not open for further replies.
Are you unaware of the Bush tax cuts on capital gains and inheritance, or simply omitting them because they disprove your claim???

the poor and middle class got the same cuts. stop squealing like the Bush cuts were specifically geared to target "the rich". under the cuts, if you paid taxes you got a cut, if you didn't pay taxes no cut. :2bigcry:
 
the poor and middle class got the same cuts. stop squealing like the Bush cuts were specifically geared to target "the rich". under the cuts, if you paid taxes you got a cut, if you didn't pay taxes no cut. :2bigcry:

Let's see your proof that the poor and middle class receive more benefit than the rich from the Bush tax cuts on capital gains and inheritance?
 
To name just a few, we have abolished DADT, we passed the first step towards UHC, we stopped the spiral into another Great depression, we are winding down 2 wars (although not as quickly as I would have preferred), we are not at war with Iran, we have invested more in alternative energy than in any presidency in history, we have taken steps to reduce our CO2, and hopefully the Bush tax cuts will finally be eliminated.

We did abolish DADT. Our depression isn't anything to be thankful for, even if it could have been worse. The reality here is that much much much more could have been done to serve the people at large. Yet who has Obama played to? Banks, Wall Street, big corporations. Is it really different? We ain't winding down wars, we're still bombing the bejesus out of place. Obama did a lot to expand military operations in the ME. McCain, however, I did feel would have launched military operations in Iran; so I'll give you that. We have done not much towards decreasing CO2, and even if the Bush tax cuts are finally allowed to go away; it does nothing for the deficit he caused while president, the expansion of power. We haven't gotten rid of GITMO or the Patriot Act. Many of the things which affect the People at large has not been addressed. The most we got out was health care, but even that sucks. How much more would we be hurting with McCain? Not much. And again, this is nothing more than a "we'll get you to hell slower" argument. I don't want to go in this direction. It is wrong for the Republic. There is no point in endorsing the status quo if I do not like the status quo.

I don't think that not having my vision of utopia realized is necessarily evil. I think some gains in the right direction are better than going in the completely wrong direction.

Not if we still NET in the wrong direction, which we are. That buys you nothing but some perceived notion of time.
 
We did abolish DADT. Our depression isn't anything to be thankful for, even if it could have been worse.

We are not in a depression, that is the point.

The reality here is that much much much more could have been done to serve the people at large.

Agreed, but we would have done much less under McCain.

Yet who has Obama played to? Banks, Wall Street, big corporations. Is it really different?

I don't see Obama playing to those groups as much as the GOP would like.

We ain't winding down wars, we're still bombing the bejesus out of place. Obama did a lot to expand military operations in the ME.

I think we should have removed all the troops immediately from our ME wars. However, we have removed most of the troops from Iraq, and Obama has not said he would dishonor the agreement to have all remaining troops out by the end of the year. That is better than we would have under McCain.


McCain, however, I did feel would have launched military operations in Iran; so I'll give you that.

Agreed

We have done not much towards decreasing CO2,

Not enough certainly, I will agree, but more than in recent history, and more than we would have under the GOP.

and even if the Bush tax cuts are finally allowed to go away; it does nothing for the deficit he caused while president, the expansion of power.

Most of Obama's spending has been to fix the mess left by the last president.

We haven't gotten rid of GITMO or the Patriot Act.

I will give you that, but we wouldn't have under McCain either.

Many of the things which affect the People at large has not been addressed.

More was proposed that was blocked by the GOP requirements for a supermajority

The most we got out was health care, but even that sucks.

The president proposed a single payer system, the congress passed the GOP idea of an insurance mandate.

How much more would we be hurting with McCain? Not much. And again, this is nothing more than a "we'll get you to hell slower" argument. I don't want to go in this direction. It is wrong for the Republic. There is no point in endorsing the status quo if I do not like the status quo.

I think we would be hurting a lot more under McCain, or I would not have voted for a moderate like Obama. I do hope liberal's will challenge him in a primary, but I am not holding my breath.

Not if we still NET in the wrong direction, which we are. That buys you nothing but some perceived notion of time.

We disagree here, I think Obama, in many areas is moving in the right direction. As I have said, I would have preferred a liberal choice, but there was none that was viable offered. Until, we as a people evolve more politically and socially, I think we will continue to only have a choice between moderates and the right. But of course, that is just my opinion, and a minority opinion at that.
 
Last edited:
Obviously. And since you care so much, post it and I'll glance at it. Its not like I didnt spend a whole thread with Conservative doing the same thing.

My record is pretty consistent. BOTH parties have spent us into a whole. BOTH parties are more invested in partisan power than the good of the country. BOTH parties share the blame. BOTH presidents own their role (as I have said several times in this thread). And yes...myopic ideological morons on BOTH sides continue to support parties and sending the same garbage to congress and the white house and continue to thump their chest like they are
View attachment 67115925

WINNING

I already posted it. You claimed you had no problem criticizing such remarks. It turns out that the truth is that you have a problem just seeing it.
 
Well how much are things different than what we would have had under McCain. You can vote any way you want, but voting for the lesser of two evils leaves you with evil. Both sides of the Republocrats make this argument, and love to say "throwing away your vote" to belittle those who actually think. But really the main difference y'all are presenting us is the speed by which we get to hell. Neither of ya are changing the destination. You can bitch and complain about the DNC putting up Obama and not being "liberal" or whatever; but that's all you're gonna get. That's how the parties have aligned themselves in our modern political circus. To me what doesn't make sense is doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results each time. Which is what people who support the Republocrats thinking it will lead to changes in the Republocrats will do. In fact, I think one called that the definition of insanity. If you do not like where the status quo has taken us, support of the status quo will not change that. It's that simple.

I have to agree with you here. There's a word for doing the same thing over and over (or voting the same way over and over) and expecting a different result.
 
that is right, the Iraqis have wanted us to stay. blaming Bush for us still being in Iraq is totally dishonest

I guess we just don't get it. When Bush was still in power, everything bad that could be said about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were his fault.

Now that Obama is in power, and continuing with exactly the same policies that Bush did, with regard to these wars, it is still somehow all Bush's fault, with none of the fault falling on Obama at all.
 
but you are the one defending Obama. it doesn't matter how crappy Bush WAS, it does nothing to take away from how crappy Obama IS

that's like defending Jeff Dahmer by saying Ted Bundy killed more


It's more like defending Timothy McVeigh by saying that Ted Bundy killed more.
 
I guess we just don't get it. When Bush was still in power, everything bad that could be said about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were his fault.

Now that Obama is in power, and continuing with exactly the same policies that Bush did, with regard to these wars, it is still somehow all Bush's fault, with none of the fault falling on Obama at all.

Liberals have been complaining about the moderate Obama not ending the Bush wars quick enough, and I am one of them. Its why I agree with Ralph Nader in hoping that several liberals will run against Obama in a primary.
 
Pretty simple - for people who just like to say "I blame Bush" over and over, how much longer do we have to hear it?

I'll dump WMD's on his plate. Other then being handed Clinton's recipe for destruction ... he didn't do much wrong.

He could have read a child's book his whole term of office and come out smelling fine.
 
Last edited:
Liberals have been complaining about the moderate Obama not ending the Bush wars quick enough, and I am one of them. Its why I agree with Ralph Nader in hoping that several liberals will run against Obama in a primary.

I think we need a new foreign policy to accompany the ending of wars. We give millions to billions of buxs to foreign countries (propping up regimes), bombing other countries without a declaration, U.N/Nato orders superseding our constitution, have hundreds of military bases across the globe, building vatican size complexes, spending money on new killing machines. and we still don't talk to cuba. :-D Is Guantanamo still open?

I need a job btw.
 
Last edited:
••••••••••
296979_249679378409581_172507986126721_728757_1154959923_n.jpg
••••••••••
 
Pretty simple - for people who just like to say "I blame Bush" over and over, how much longer do we have to hear it?

Haha - forever and always.

It won't end. He's pegged with these things for all eternity and will never be able to part from them.
 
I guess we just don't get it. When Bush was still in power, everything bad that could be said about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were his fault.

Now that Obama is in power, and continuing with exactly the same policies that Bush did, with regard to these wars, it is still somehow all Bush's fault, with none of the fault falling on Obama at all.
This statement just proves that you haven't listened to many liberals and that you've ignored many of the posts in this thread. :shrug:
 
Haha - forever and always.

It won't end. He's pegged with these things for all eternity and will never be able to part from them.
Just like every other president and human being. We're all responsible for our actions and their consequences forever and always. :shrug:
 
Just like every other president and human being. We're all responsible for our actions and their consequences forever and always. :shrug:

unless your name is Barack Obama, then you get to blame everything on Bush :shrug:
 
unless your name is Barack Obama, then you get to blame everything on Bush :shrug:
Just proof that you don't listen to many liberals and that you've ignored many posts in this thread. :shrug:
 
••••••••••
View attachment 67115936
••••••••••
I like how your chart ignores that 3/4ths of 2009 was operating under Bush's budget or that the expected shortfall for 2009 before Obama even became president was 1.2 trillion or that the debt increased by over a trillion dollars before Obama was even elected.
 
Just proof that you don't listen to many liberals and that you've ignored many posts in this thread. :shrug:

just proof that you care about nothing except excusing Obama's lousy performance at any cost.
 
Blame him for what?

for anything negative that is said about Obama's performance as POTUS.


Obama hasn't done crap to help the economy. it's Bush's fault

Obama hasn't brought all the troops home from Iraq. it's Bush's fault

Obama hasn't closed GITMO. it's Bush's fault


every criticism of Obama is met by squeals of "it's not his fault, he inherited that problem from Bush"
 
Who passed the budget legislation that Bush (to his discredit) signed in 2007? 2008? Who passed the spending legislation that Obama (to his discredit) signed in 2009? 2010?

Everyone in DC has **** on them.
 
just proof that you care about nothing except excusing Obama's lousy performance at any cost.

Excuse Obama? Me? I actually did the exact opposite. This was my first post in the thread:

I'll always hold him responsible for his actions and the consequences of them just like I hold every other president and person responsible for their actions and the consequences of them. However, at this point Congress for their stupidity and Obama for his lack of effective leadership are also responsible for their slow and ineffective actions which, I believe, have prolonged the current state of the economy more than it needs to be.

Thank you for showing everybody who reads this thread what I already know: you base all of your statements on an imaginary reality where you replace what people have actually done and said with what you want them to have done and said.
 
...every criticism of Obama is met by squeals of "it's not his fault, he inherited that problem from Bush"

your reckless use of the word "every" is pathetic & dishonest.

how many Democrats blame Bush for Obamacare?

how many Democrats blame Bush for Obama's failure to stand up to the Republicans?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom