Actually, he is smart enough to keep it in the proper context. That is why he made the comment that he did.Bodhisattva said...
In reality the child isnt effected by forced "child support" so that debate is pointless
Women tricking guys or women getting pregnant for selfish reasons are "Stupid scenarios"? I think that you need to live a little, buddy. You sound REALLY naive.Please. We should base laws on some stupid scenario that you have dreamed up and ignore the reality of how virtually all pregnancies occur?
I have found that people that turn the argument of child support and her choice around to one of reproduction and his role ending at ejaculation to be those of limited intellect.Again, a man's part in the reproductive process ends when he plants his seed. That is not even close to true for the woman. She has just begun and the sex act will seem grossly insignificant compared to the efforts that she will take to finish the pregnancy and bear a child. We can't make this equal by law. It is a fact of biology.
Each and every individual has an equal right to control what part they take in reproduction. The fact that the man's role is pretty minor does not change the fact he has taken part in the process willingly and is therefore responsible for the result.