It's like ZOOOOOOOOOOM!
...right over their heads.
because that wouldnt be living in reality and would hurt their unrealistic bias arguments. Its about twisting it into other things ignoring your point because it really cant be argued against.
If they cant win they attempt to change the game
Its called moving the goal post
In my humble opinion - you mislabeled your thread. It's about responsibility biases, rights inequalities, and completely circumventing the true issue, which is how people will stand responsible to a kid should one be born as a result of poor judgment and behaviors in sexual relationships. I don't see anything about direct issues surrounding "child support payments" other than men are unfairly and unjustly abused by the system because women have the right to choose abortion OR NOT and they don't have any choices at all. If the woman keeps the kid because she want to, then woe on the man because he's been name as a party to creating a baby, which he didn't want. And if he wants to have the kid in his life - then be a man about it and take responsibility.
If a man has a relationship and the woman hoodwinks a him by getting pregnant - too bad for the guy. Having sex is part of human nature, but it also can have consequences of all kinds. The only REAL VICTIM is a kid that is a bi-product of irresponsible sexual acts.
In all of your arguments - you leave out the kid. The kids welfare is totally shunned and they are invisible in your rant. The kid becomes the reason for conflicts. The kid becomes the object and reason for it's loser parents who can't accept responsibility to waste time and resources blaming each other...blaming the laws for being bias.
I'd suggest to all men and women - don't have sex with somebody you don't want to marry.
And if you plan on marrying someone - BEFORE getting married - check out the local "child support laws". If one feels like the laws are way too biased one way or another, then do a pre-marriage contract on what each person's responsibilities will be in case of children and a divorce happens. It can be used in the divorce hearings. If the other person doesn't want to do a pre-marriage contract -then a serious decision needs to be made about NOT having kids.
Most people who go into business with partners will surely do a partnership contract. Since men and women are apparently too stupid and ignorant about the consequences of having sex - maybe the law should require people to sign a sex contract prior to having sex, which defines what rights and responsibilities each will have if a pregnancy occurs. That sure will mess up that 1st spontaneous encounter, but prevent a whole lot of future bull**** and leave children the victims of irresponsible parents.
Sorry I have nothing else to say besides what a load of crap
nobody is leaving out the kid, you just want to turn it into the kid because the other way cant be argued.
Forcing money on a mom or dad IN REALITY wont do **** for the kid LMAO
Forcing people to be parents that DONT WANT TO BE wont do **** for the kid LMAO
only people who want to be REAL parents can be and changing the laws to make it more fair and nondiscriminative will not effect that ONE SINGLE BIT
people that WANT to be parent s still will
save the fantasy stuff and appeals to emotions for others because they arent real world solutions.
It be GREAT if they were but that are not.
The issue is that society has had this issue shoved down our throats for decades now. To challenge this sexist and irresponsible laws is to be a mysoginist or against woman's rights or not caring for the child. Well, the women backed themsleves into a corner but shout at anybody that mentions it. They got the right to have control over their own bodies, which is good. But the right to have an abortion means that if they don't want the child, they abort.
Well, that also means that if they don't want to support the child on their own since the man doesn't want to help, she can have an abortion. It is an out for both and and out for a woman that does not want to support the child on her own. It is truly win/win. But no. Women's rights groups and femiNazis have brainwashed everybody into this mantra: Once a man ejaculates all his rights are over and all his opinions are meaningless. What is worse is that the courts have been turned into political correctness machines that have ignored the very issue that I am bringing up.