My views on the usage of moby are this: Language is a living thing and the meaning of my usage is conveyed in the context. If there exists a word that is more accurate than moby, then I plead ignorance and will do better next time, after you educate me about what word I should have used. If language was static then homosexuals wouldn't have appropriated the word gay unto themselves and it would still define happiness but because language is a living thing, ever changing, we also see that young people have reappropriated the word away from homosexuals and now use it to define things are are lame and for people who are losers. You can't have it both ways. You chastise me, but do you chastise homosexuals?