• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Multiculturalism

See OP


  • Total voters
    23
It means that most of the scientific community agrees that race does not have a biological basis.

Can you prove that? If race isn't biological, how do you account for the fact that black people have black offspring?
 
Why do you care? You just want me to say something you can use to demean me, and that's not happening, old sock. If your genetic history is one you are ashamed of and want to protect in here with constant bickering, that's not going to happen either.

I have given you no reason whatsoever to think I am defensive; on the contrary, it is you who has become defensive with your offensiveness.

Has Basher ever answered one direct question, or does he turn everything around on the one he's addressing?
 
Why do you care? You just want me to say something you can use to demean me, and that's not happening, old sock. If your genetic history is one you are ashamed of and want to protect in here with constant bickering, that's not going to happen either.

I have given you no reason whatsoever to think I am defensive; on the contrary, it is you who has become defensive with your offensiveness.

I'm not trying to demean you - you made a claim that one part of the population is raping, murdering and abusing us. All you have to do is clarify which part. Moreover, how do you my genetic history - you don't. Which part is raping us? Which part is murdering us? You're new here, so maybe you don't get that people are expected to back up their claims. Which part?
 
Can you prove that? If race isn't biological, how do you account for the fact that black people have black offspring?
Because skin color is genetic. That was easy. Next question please.
 
No, he wants you to be more specific so he can actually know what the **** you're talking about. Do you always get like this when you get asked to be more specific?

You are either deliberately lying to support him or you are as stupid as he is.
 
Has Basher ever answered one direct question, or does he turn everything around on the one he's addressing?

Do you inhabitants of this silly room all sleep in the same bed and wait like spiders for some fly to get caught in your net of lies?
 
Genetics have nothing to do with biology?
Yes, skin color is biological/genetic - that's why people with cappuccino skin often have cappuccino children.
 
Yes, skin color is biological/genetic - that's why people with cappuccino skin often have cappuccino children.

Thank you for proving me right, old sock.
 
You are either deliberately lying to support him or you are as stupid as he is.

Or, you just like to say something and just expect people to know what you're talking about. Seriously, stop playing games. Which "segment" are you referring to?
 
Or, you just like to say something and just expect people to know what you're talking about. Seriously, stop playing games. Which "segment" are you referring to?

Look it up, lazybones.
 
Can you prove that? If race isn't biological, how do you account for the fact that black people have black offspring?

No one said race isn't bioloigcal; it's been said it's a highly subjective classification system that is almost useless in rigorous scientific practice, which is why most biologists don't depend on it and why most of the scientific community sees it more as a social construct and than a distinct taxonomical fact.

The point being made is that race is not the stiff classification category many seem to think it is. Race is a subjective grouping of people based on national and geographical hertiage coupled with general physical characteristics. People of African descent tend to have dark skin, wider noses, tightly curled hair, etc. People of Asian descent tend to have finer hair, flatter and wider faces, and be of smaller stature. People of Northern European descent tend to have bigger statures, paler skin and hair, etc. But these surface differences make up a EXTREMELY TINY amount of their genetic code. If you compare a Africans DNA to a Norwegians DNA, 99% of it is the same. The only difference is some general physical characteristics.
 
Thank you for proving me right, old sock.

You've made the mistake of equating race with skin color. While race is based on skin color, it's a concept that has little basis in biology or genetics. That is why we call race a social construct.
 
I actually didn't prove you right. Skin color is not the same thing as race, old boy.

I have never made such a statement, and you should be ashamed of continuing to put words in my mouth.
 
No one said race isn't bioloigcal
To be fair to Mr. Defensive, I did say that "race has no biological basis" - meaning that there isn't an objective biological basis by which we can measure race.
 
No one said race isn't bioloigcal; it's been said it's a highly subjective classification system that is almost useless in rigorous scientific practice, which is why most biologists don't depend on it and why most of the scientific community sees it more as a social construct and than a distinct taxonomical fact.

The point being made is that race is not the stiff classification category many seem to think it is. Race is a subjective grouping of people based on national and geographical hertiage coupled with general physical characteristics. People of African descent tend to have dark skin, wider noses, tightly curled hair, etc. People of Asian descent tend to have finer hair, flatter and wider faces, and be of smaller stature. People of Northern European descent tend to have bigger statures, paler skin and hair, etc. But these surface differences make up a EXTREMELY TINY amount of their genetic code. If you compare a Africans DNA to a Norwegians DNA, 99% of it is the same. The only difference is some general physical characteristics.

You're so full of it, you rattle when you walk.
 
I have never made such a statement, and you should be ashamed of continuing to put words in my mouth.
So then how did I prove you right, Basher?

Again, which segment rapes, murders and abuses us? Clarification please - it only takes one word.
 
To be fair to Mr. Defensive, I did say that "race has no biological basis" - meaning that there isn't an objective biological basis by which we can measure race.

That "Mr. Defensive" childishness becomes you very well.
 
I have never made such a statement, and you should be ashamed of continuing to put words in my mouth.

Here's where:

It means that most of the scientific community agrees that race does not have a biological basis.

Can you prove that? If race isn't biological, how do you account for the fact that black people have black offspring?

Because skin color is genetic. That was easy. Next question please.

Knowing how to read, helps.
 
Back
Top Bottom