- Joined
- Sep 29, 2007
- Messages
- 29,262
- Reaction score
- 10,126
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
We don't need more bureaucrats, so no thanks.
We don't need more over paid executives either.
We don't need more bureaucrats, so no thanks.
We don't need more over paid executives either.
Both of our opinions are subjective,but I'm willing to bet yours is more subjective than mine.
Creating jobs to do busy work, doesn't provide a net benefit to anyone, except the job holder.
:ssst: your statement above is purely subjective.
There is plenty of redundancy and just plain busy work in corp America. As well as reward for abject failure.
There is plenty of redundancy and just plain busy work in corp America. As well as reward for abject failure.
Unfortunately, it has also been the government rewarding this failure as of late.
I'm guessing you are paying for this $1 Trillion increase.
Anyway, public works projects are temporary and worthless for good growth.
The government creates jobs, fact. End of thread.
Reagan did many things which were intended to heal the economy, but that wasn't one of them. He did that for the sake of national security, at the expense of the economy. The fact that the economy improved so much is amazing, but it's even more amazing when you consider the fact that we were working on an even bigger problem at the same time, which made it twice as hard to fix the economy.Reagan increased the payroll tax in order to apply that revenue towards defense spending. By that, Reagan used public-private partnerships in order to empower the "military industrial complex" to create jobs and improve job growth.
The government creates jobs, fact. End of thread.
Government can create jobs that is just a fact. Anyone who denies this is out of their mind, and ignoring facts.