• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Where do you land

Where do you land?

  • I am wealthy, and favor tax hikes for the wealthy

    Votes: 8 11.4%

  • I am not wealthy, and favor tax hikes for the wealthy

    Votes: 27 38.6%

  • I am wealthy, and against tax hikes for the wealthy

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • I am not wealthy, and against tax hikes for the wealthy

    Votes: 23 32.9%

  • Other

    Votes: 12 17.1%

  • Unsure

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    70
CaptainCourtesy said:
No. I got my analogy correct. You did not. There is a difference between science and belief. You can believe all you want, but if science disproves you, you are incorrect. However, you cannot make this determination in a time where the science did not exist. This is what you keep failing to get.
Click to expand...
Awesome. You're still wrong and ~20 other people agree.
 
Last edited:
I am not wealthy by any stretch, and I favor tax cuts because those people create the jobs not Government a certainly not Obama.
 
I find it interesting that no one who favors tax cuts for the wealthy describes themselves as wealthy. There's got to be people making a few hundred grand a year on here, which would certainly fall under my definition of wealthy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom