- Joined
- Sep 7, 2010
- Messages
- 26,526
- Reaction score
- 9,462
- Location
- Alabama
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
These "studies" have been highly criticized and discredited because of their methodological problems. For example, they did not complete their study. They just stopped as soon as they got the data they were looking for.
And even if it was true its still insignificant protection. Condoms and other prophylactics provide real, measurable, protection whereas circumcision does not.
OMFG....say it isn't so, a "scientific study" that manipulated data to come up with the results they were looking for????? IMPOSSIBLE :lamo
I've been trying to tell Tucker the same damn thing in another thread. apparently he thinks "scientific studies" are infallible.