He's good but overrated
He IS the King!
He isnt that good and he IS overrated
OTHER / I Dont Know
It's possible to make a complex piece of art that nobody likes. Could you really classify that as "great" art? In my opinion, the worth of a piece of art is directly proportional to the number of people who enjoy it. Which do you think people would prefer to prevent -- the demolition of the statue of liberty, or the burning of a technically complex artist that nobody really knows?
Last edited by Jeezy; 06-29-11 at 12:11 AM.
Originally Posted by Josie
Yeah, I think he's overrated by some fans. I know people who acted as if he was still at his peak when he clearly wasn't. After the Bad album, his career was pretty craptastic. Though back in the 80's he was THE MAN and deserved the title. He was a hit machine and a great performer. He just didn't age well as a person or as an artist. In the 80's we thought Michael was a little weird, but in a loveable, eccentric sort of way. In the 90's and beyond, Michael wasweird in a creepy sort of way.
Slipping into madness is good for the sake of comparison - Unknown.
I never liked any of Michael Jackson's music after he was no longer with the Jackson 5. Just wasn't my taste.
"Never fear. Him is here" - Captain Chaos (Dom DeLuise), Cannonball Run
Mace Windu: Then our worst fears have been realized. We must move quickly if the Jedi Order is to survive.
He was good no denying that...and when he was a kid on the jackson 5 and normal he was alot better...but for along time he was a bag of bones looked like a scarecrow with a made up face...but that was his insanity....you have to pity him for what he did to himself
I love the smell of face-palm in the morning!
"You ain't no Muslim bruv!"
"**** michael, I don't care how good you can sing and dance. you can't play with little boy's booty holes. I got babies, you nasty mother ****er."
like far too many others, talent wasted on a sorry individual. perhaps he was abused himself as a child. perhaps some traumatic event froze his emotional development at the 13 y/o level. whatever the case, he was a freak.
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.
An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.
Jackson was never the King that was, is and always will be Elvis.
Jackson was a pedophile and in the end Jackson was very mentally ill.
Most people in the entertainment industry are way over rated.
Having interviewed a lot of famous and semi famous people I have to say most are just people and there is nothing special about them.
They can sing, act, or have a good Radio voice and a little talent but in the end they are going to have gas, burp, and sit on a toilet just like everyone else.
Did Thriller music suck until it was released and sold?
That seems just a stranger, Wickerman version of ad populum.
I may be wrong.
The issue when discussing art is its an entirely subjective thing.
Once you get past the "fundamentals" of something, it is all preference. And even then, some people can see breaking from the fundamentals purposefully as art itself.
There is something to be said with the notion of popularity defining what's "good". Take Mozart or Beethoven for example...are they "great" classical music because they are somehow significantly better by some measurable standard than other contemporary classical composers? Or did their music gain popularity that allowed it to live on through the ages better than other composers and thus the popularity is what essentially dictated they were "good"?
I think in terms of pop music...be it bubblegum, rock, rap, R&B, country, whatever pop you wish...popularity and longevity does say a lot about it. Is Adele a better singer than Britney Spears? Without question in my mind. However, I'd rate Britney as a greater and more influencial all around performer in a heart beat due to her longevity in the public, multitude of successful songs, and essentially helping to create the modern mold for the female young pop star as the first on since Madonna that truly captured such significant and lengthy attention.
In comparison to contemporaries in this age of music, I don't believe Michael Jackson is overrated. Indeed, I think some may underrate him due to his personal isses (Similar to how OJ Simpson is more apt to not appear on a list of the top 10 or 20 running backs in some peoples minds). Thriller was an absolute revolution with regards to music videos and how they were done. The man had a successful mainstream song in five seperate decades. Was regarded quickly as a prodigy as a young child and, unlike many child singers, managed to actually maintain his singing ability after being a child. He's got the largest selling record in the world and the most #1 singles by a male performer in the modern era. He's the only person in the Dance hall of fame whose dancing career focused around pop/rock and roll. He transcended music with regards to putting out mini-films, video games, commercials, etc. He became essentially a social icon as much as an actual performer. The glove, the moonwalk, the kick, the "cha'mone" line, etc. These are random cultural references that if you randomly did today most anyone above a certain age is going to INSTANTLY recognize.
As a musician, the guy was multi-talented in a package I would argue fewer have than the OP makes it out to be. His vocal abilities were excellent and are regarded by many critics as being a major talent. As I said earlier, he was thought of as a prodigy as a child. He had significant vocal range and stylistic abilities with his singing from your more fast paced rapping, to straight singing, hitting large highers or going with teeth clenching aggression. Also, not as commonly known from just his songs, he was rather adapt at beat boxing, mimicing various instruments and used that as part of his song creation method in nailing down tunes. Which leads to the next thing, unlike many current singers Jackson also wrote much of his own songs, which has led to him to be inducted into the songwriters hall of fame as well. His dancing skills were exceedingly good, and to my understanding he too generally was involved in the choreography of his videos. His stylistic range in the type of music he would work with was diverse, from motown to funk to more rock inspired beats.
In terms of the modern era, I'd definitely place him on similar footing as the Beatles, Elvis, and some of the other more highly regarded as extremely influencial acts of the past 50 years.
"I am appalled that somebody who is the nominee...would take that kind of position"
"A court took away a presidency"
"...the brother of a man running for president was the governor of the state..."
It's horrifying because Trump is blunt instead of making overt implications.