mtlhdtodd
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2009
- Messages
- 309
- Reaction score
- 180
- Location
- Federal Way, WA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
I still think he is the lesser of two evils...
Hmm and I saw as the evil of two lessers
I still think he is the lesser of two evils...
Hmm and I saw as the evil of two lessers
I can't find any legitimate Leftists who supported him. Why the Freepers keep calling him a 'Leftist' when he has far more in common with Republicans than any other gang of neo-liberals is a mystery.
He is an illegal pos. A thief like his gorilla wife. Users and haters of white people. Producer of ugly children. Anti-american little BITCH. Crackhead who slurps sperm from homeless white men just for a rock. In other words he's a ****ing winner for the democrats.
you should be banned. hate speech with no redeeming value.
Moderator's Warning: |
Get on topic. If you think a post breaks the rules, report it. If people continue to talk about who should be banned, or who is a troll, in this thread or others, they will be thread banned. |
You received the favorite of the left in office, and now leftists are saddened that their man seems to not be their man. I find the far more likely explanations for this being, 1) He was not as radical as he portrayed himself 2) The reality of office changes even the most ideologically determined man. I am leaning more toward number 2 than 1.
Ask and you shall not receive. Do not be let down by your ideology, reevaluate it and figure out if maybe there is something deeply flawed about your convictions, instead.
You received the favorite of the left in office, and now leftists are saddened that their man seems to not be their man. I find the far more likely explanations for this being, 1) He was not as radical as he portrayed himself 2) The reality of office changes even the most ideologically determined man. I am leaning more toward number 2 than 1.
Ask and you shall not receive. Do not be let down by your ideology, reevaluate it and figure out if maybe there is something deeply flawed about your convictions, instead.
I don't have an ideology; ideologies are for illiterates, pseudo-intellectuals and those that are too lazy to do their own work.
I know it's a fashionable thing to say,
but do you know what you really just said?
Taking the time to look at how your beliefs fit together takes far more work than to develop them in a vacuum, as though they have no effect on each other. No one ever said your ideology had to fit cleanly into any pre-existing ideology - that is simply your fashionable misunderstanding.
Whatever rings your bell. You obviously like cramming all issues into some pat little framework, others don't, and since you have no idea what you're talking about, shopping around and finding some ideology that tells you what you want to hear and beleive is probably the best you can do.
Like I said, it's not like voting matters; some people just like to pretend their opinions and beliefs are important to powers that be, despite all evidence to the contrary, and certainly on message boards there are lots who are desperate enough to hope their 25,000 odd posts of rhetorical partisan wrangling is actually relevant, instead of merely entertaining fluff.
Like I already said, ones ideology does not need to fit into any pre-existing ideology. You can make up your own. All you are doing is continuing to show you don't know what an ideology is, and that you simply don't like the word. An ideology is simply the consideration of purpose and consistency.
What you are saying is that purpose and consistency is bad. I sincerely hope that is not your honest position. If it is, then I think I've figured out what's wrong with our political discourse these days.
I fail to see what the second paragraph has to do with.
Barack Obama has been an absolute disaster in almost every way. It may take a generation for the Democratic Party to recover from his time in office. The sooner they divorce themselves from this man, the better off they will be. Of course, anyone who paid any attention to the 2008 nomination could have seen this trainwreck coming from a mile away.
At this point, I would say he gets beat in 2012 by a similar margin he won by in 2008.
Oberon, exactly. Its not the team thats the problem -- its the league.
Although, it would certainly be nice to see someone in office with even a minimal level of competency.
Whatever rings your bell. You obviously like cramming all issues into some pat little framework, others don't, and since you have no idea what you're talking about, shopping around and finding some ideology that tells you what you want to hear and beleive is probably the best you can do.
Like I said, it's not like voting matters; some people just like to pretend their opinions and beliefs are important to powers that be, despite all evidence to the contrary, and certainly on message boards there are lots who are desperate enough to hope their 25,000 odd posts of rhetorical partisan wrangling is actually relevant, instead of merely entertaining fluff.
We have a rather large glut of those "liberals" here as well