• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Presidential use of the autopen

Is the use of the autopen to sign bills Constitutional?

  • Total voters
    25
In any case, it's a moot point. Bills that have been approved by both houses of Congress automatically become law without the president's signature after 10 days, unless the president vetoes them or unless Congress has adjourned in the interim. So in most cases it wouldn't even matter if the autopen was a "legitimate" signature or not.
 
Anyone can use an autopen like the people who go into natl archives and change document words.
 
I do not agree with ‘autopen’ when it comes to signing bills but, what do you expect from presidents?
They could give a…’fffffff
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom