• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Tabooed N-Word

See OP

  • It spontaneous/ Never know when I may say it

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    57
yeah... sure .. .whatever ... we all know that every child is born fresh and new and the past means nothing and family history is irrelevant...... and the past never happened.

And what happened 200 years ago has what effect on a newborn black person how exactly?

If anything, he isn't used as extra farm labor on the dirt farms where they are trying to grow yams... and he isn't spending what little free time he is kicking rocks for fun, when he doesn't have to lay around instead of playing to conserve what little energy he has because us dirty americans won't donate 1 dollar to keep a starving child in africa alive....

:roll:
 
Cool, and the fact that your ancestors were slaves has what to do with what you are now? Why bother bringing it up at all?

Apparently you didn't read the post he was responding to.

:failpail:
 
Race and ethnicity are not what lead to playing the "victim card". Nor is there any real connection to political orientation. I mean, look at how many white conservatives play the victim in your average thread concerning bias in the media or affirmative action.

Victims deserve to be victimized. Winners get revenge. And the best revenge is living well.
 
I see you choose to dodge like an unwilling alter boy instead of actually manning up and providing the evidence.

Which particular claim have I made that you feel needs backing up? I will gladly provide a source for you.

yeah right. whenever faced with an opinion you can't refute, you squeal "prove it" like a 5 year old.



you claimed: individuals have chips on their shoulders, not groups

I claimed: more of those individuals are black

you squealed: prove it

prove it: the first resort of the weak minded
 
yeah... sure .. .whatever ... we all know that every child is born fresh and new and the past means nothing and family history is irrelevant...... and the past never happened.

nice misrepresentation. but, hey, whatever lets you sleep at night.
 
And I certainly did not call you a "nigger".


you just hinted around it. insinuated he is a "nigger" without actually calling him a "nigger" , that's worse than coming out and saying it straight up. but, I guess, your way gives you plausible deniability, since you never actually posted the words.
 
yeah right. whenever faced with an opinion you can't refute, you squeal "prove it" like a 5 year old.



you claimed: individuals have chips on their shoulders, not groups

I claimed: more of those individuals are black

you squealed: prove it

prove it: the first resort of the weak minded

Am I the only one who finds it ironic that Oscar is whining about squealing when faced with being unable to provide evidence for his own argument? ;)
 
Am I the only one who finds it ironic that Oscar is whining about squealing when faced with being unable to provide evidence for his own argument? ;)


:2bigcry: prove it ;)
 
Apparently you didn't read the post he was responding to.

:failpail:

I read it, my question still stands. If something that happened in the distant past has nothing to do with present reality, why bring up the past at all?
 
I read it, my question still stands. If something that happened in the distant past has nothing to do with present reality, why bring up the past at all?

because there are certain people and groups of people who blame their failures of today and some crap that happened in the distant past.
 
What gets me is if you campaign against a black candidate, then you're considered a racist, unless that black candidate is a Conservative. (The liberals are already starting in on Herman Cain) Of course if you're liberal, you want to forget the fact that both Martin Luther King Jr. and Sr. were both conservative Republicans.
 
What gets me is if you campaign against a black candidate, then you're considered a racist, unless that black candidate is a Conservative. (The liberals are already starting in on Herman Cain) Of course if you're liberal, you want to forget the fact that both Martin Luther King Jr. and Sr. were both conservative Republicans.

Not King Sr.
 
What gets me is if you campaign against a black candidate, then you're considered a racist, unless that black candidate is a Conservative. (The liberals are already starting in on Herman Cain)
Who called you a racist for campaigning against Obama and why are projecting that experience onto an entire group of people?

Of course if you're liberal, you want to forget the fact that both Martin Luther King Jr. and Sr. were both conservative Republicans.
MLK Sr. was a Republican until the Civil Rights movement when the parties realigned and most racist Democrats joined the Republican Party. MLK Jr. was not a Republican and he supported democratic socialism.
 
Not King Sr.

BOTH of them. Here's another little shocker. You've heard of Fred Phelps? You know, the nutcase who leads the Westboro Baptist Church. Guess what: He's a registered Democrat.
 
Who called you a racist for campaigning against Obama and why are projecting that experience onto an entire group of people?

all you have to do is read any Obama thread here to see it. the first rebuttal to any attack/complaint about Obama that comes out of libby mouth is "racist" or "you are only against him because he's black"
 
What gets me is if you campaign against a black candidate, then you're considered a racist, unless that black candidate is a Conservative. (The liberals are already starting in on Herman Cain) Of course if you're liberal, you want to forget the fact that both Martin Luther King Jr. and Sr. were both conservative Republicans.

King expressed sympathies toward democratic socialism.
 
You are also aware, of course, that James Earl Ray was a Democrat.
 
BOTH of them. Here's another little shocker. You've heard of Fred Phelps? You know, the nutcase who leads the Westboro Baptist Church. Guess what: He's a registered Democrat.

You are also aware, of course, that James Earl Ray was a Democrat.

Democrat =/= liberal, especially in the early to mid part of the 20th century, and even today.
 
Am I the only one who finds it ironic that Oscar is whining about squealing when faced with being unable to provide evidence for his own argument? ;)

Opinions don't need evidence.
 
on a debate site they do.

No, they dont.

And opinion is an opinion. It can be justified by personal observations that are not "sourced".

So say someone needs "a link" or "a source" for an opinion is an absolute cop out.

Someone asking for "a link" or "a source" for an opinion shows that they have no way of arguing against said opinion.
 
No, they dont.

And opinion is an opinion. It can be justified by personal observations that are not "sourced".

So say someone needs "a link" or "a source" for an opinion is an absolute cop out.

Someone asking for "a link" or "a source" for an opinion shows that they have no way of arguing against said opinion.

Just don't expect people to take you seriously when you use your own observations and extrapolate them to make conclusions about the entire population, because like I told you before, anecdote =/= data.
 
Back
Top Bottom