does anyone even comprehend the number of bodies per day during that short period that these institutions would've
had to churn out? 6 million is a physical impossibility with the limited operations within these camps.
i'm not denying that the nazis killed jews...i'm just saying that 6 million is totally an off the charts impossibility.
We know, in detail, how they struggled to make the death camps as industrially-efficient as possible. I don't think it is at all impossible.
Do you have any supporting evidence for this assertion at all?
Holocaust Timeline: The Camps
Fiddling While Rome Burns
Carthago Delenda Est
"I used to roll the dice; see the fear in my enemies' eyes... listen as the crowd would sing, 'now the old king is dead, Long Live the King.'.."
2) The camps and the Einsatzgruppen weren't restricted to just killing Jews. They killed all, "undesirables", which is where the 6 million figure comes from.
- Colonel Paul YinglingNobody who wins a war indulges in a bifurcated definition of victory. War is a political act; victory and defeat have meaning only in political terms. A country incapable of achieving its political objectives at an acceptable cost is losing the war, regardless of battlefield events.
Bifurcating victory (e.g. winning militarily, losing politically) is a useful salve for defeated armies. The "stab in the back" narrative helped take the sting out of failure for German generals after WWI and their American counterparts after Vietnam.
All the same, it's nonsense. To paraphrase Vince Lombardi, show me a political loser, and I'll show you a loser.