- Joined
- Jun 17, 2010
- Messages
- 9,800
- Reaction score
- 2,719
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Other
If she had a miscarriage (there is some debate about that in the article), I believe he could be sued for libel, I am not a lawyer though.
Also, he looks suspiciously like he wants to eat the child.
Can he be sued for libel or defamation if no names were named?
Can he be sued for libel or defamation if no names were named?
Wow this is a messy one.
1st off IMO the guy is a douchbag dick head.
Now thats out of the way, his name isnt up ther, her name isnt up there so Im not really sure where the legal part comes in.
Like some one else said if she didnt get an abortion that libel but again, no names were mentioned.
Also invasion of privacy could apply because its medical history/procedure but again no names were mentioned.
Tough call indeed . . . . . . .
Im thinkin its right to take it down, and the jail time is if he doesnt comply with the court order so i have no problem with that.
This should have been on the billboard instead.
Where the hell do you find this stuff lol?
Nope. Free speech.
This should have been on the billboard instead.
Is any of that against NM or Federal law?His picture is up there, and anybody who knew they were a couple would then know he is talking about her very personal, private, medical, business.
this remains to be seen.
But a Judge already ordered him to take it down
free speech doesnt allow you to harass or be libel or invade another person privacy like medical history, conditions, procedures.
His picture is up there, and anybody who knew they were a couple would then know he is talking about her very personal, private, medical, business.