"Though no one can go back and make a brand new start, anyone can start from now and make a brand new ending."
If it can be proven that she either had an abortion or told him or someone else willing to testify that she did, then I suspect he's done nothing wrong....truth being the ultimate defense in cases of libel and slander.
I don't feel sorry for her. She picked the goofball.
Thank you, Quazi!
According to this other article he states that he:
So, yeah - obvious libel - he even admits it's libel. He doesn't actually know anything about how things happened but went and did this anyway.doesn't know how the child died. He said: 'But if it was abortion, then my purpose is to try to prevent this from happening to someone else'.
And - you're right - he's a nutter:
Really - Anton LaVey as a guy who inspires him. Geesh man. . . what a way to pick 'emHe listens to a diverse range of music and lists Bill Gates and Satanist author Anton LaVey as 'people who inspire' him. He lists the TV show 'Big Love' and the 'Saw' movies as favourites.
A screaming comes across the sky.
It has happened before, but there is nothing to compare it to now.Pynchon - Gravity's Rainbow
Flip this around....
Lets say he had a picture of him smiling and looking all healthy with the caption "This is what I'd look like if my ex-girlfriend didn't give me HIV".
Add to that he has no factual evidence that his ex HAD HIV and he's slept with other people so it may not even have came from her.
Would that be legal in your mind?
You're borderline revealing private medical information to someone on an extremely public level, which I could see veering into the harassment category. If it wasn't for him putting her name up there in an attempt to use it as an acronym for a group that doesn't exist, I'd be leaning a bit the other way. However, because of that, I can see where it falls potentially more on the illegal side.
I think he's a grade A douche bag and jerk, and if it turns out there's nothing legally wrong with what he did then so be it...however, I have no issue with it being examined if he did violate the law and if he did, even slightly, throwing the book at him.
"I am appalled that somebody who is the nominee...would take that kind of position"
"A court took away a presidency"
"...the brother of a man running for president was the governor of the state..."
It's horrifying because Trump is blunt instead of making overt implications.
Is the guy a major douche for doing this? Yup, sure is. I'd smack him silly if I knew him.
Does he have a legal right to do this? Sorry, but yes... he does. It's not only 'her' private life that is being discussed, but 'his' as well.
Evelyn Beatrice Hall, writing under the pseudonym of Stephen G Tallentyre in The Friends of Voltaire (1906)I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
According to the article.. The women refused to say whether she aborted or had a miscarriage.. I am guessing she aborted.. There would be no reason to hide the miscarriage.. I also didn't see anything about him refusing to marry her.. Again, is there another article??The woman's friends say she had a miscarriage, not an abortion, according to a report in the Albuquerque Journal.
You obviously know more than I do about it.. I still don't know how you all figured out her name was Nani.. Again that isn't in the OP article..
So.. Where are you getting all this other info and are you sure it is correct??
Like I said.. I don't like his wording..
She wanted to get married. He refused. Right there, in my estimation, the ball became hers and hers alone, to do with as she saw fit. If he didn't want to commit? There's your sign. And every female I know, looking at a six-month old relationship that ended in pregnancy and no offer of marriage, would agree.