- Joined
- Jul 27, 2010
- Messages
- 37,412
- Reaction score
- 13,542
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Other
It probably the same supreme power he gets to bypass logic and argue that the "naturalness" of something has anything to do with its morality.
I think his position is pretty freaking immoral... Not only is he discriminately choosing who is "unworthy," but he kind of lost all his principles in the process. He flips and then says, well there is an exception... and every exception in his principles leads to disallowing one group in society to be equal... and that is immoral. It's blatant discrimination, and he abandons principle to permit it.