California is a uniquely mis-managed state. I think everyone agrees on that.
But here's a question: would you rather live in Arizona or Minnesota? Having just moved from Arizona to Minnesota, I can tell you there are a few things I notice immediately, back on the job hunt and having a lapse in insurance.
1. The economy here is way better. While it may be true that living is cheaper in AZ, it's only by a bit, and there are no jobs, and the ones there are pay less money, and the cost of living is not significantly cheaper to bridge the gap. Minnesota has more jobs, that pay better, sufficiently to bridge the gap in higher cost of living which really isn't that much higher. In fact, I can get a studio in Minneapolis for less than I was paying in AZ.
2. There are fewer resources in AZ. ACCESS (a low-income health option) is basically inaccessible unless you work for min wage part-time (if you're unemployed you don't qualify, and if you make $1300-ish a year you don't qualify), which you can't live on anyway. And ACCESS has recently been cut for single adults, which I am. Even if you qualify, it's about 16 years of paperwork and wait time. I just went to the clinic for free today in Minneapolis. Took me 5 minutes to register.
3.
Who has lower crime? That's really all I need to say.
4. Who has a better education system? Again, no more is needed.
5. ...But related to education, I can go to the community college in Minneapolis for free, and I can't in AZ. Even if I was a resident.
All of these things would be true when comparing almost any red and blue state. There are acceptions. But generally, if you live in a blue state you're better off.