• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Incest - Good, Bad, Ugly?

Good, bad, harmless, legalize?


  • Total voters
    18
to "some" people it does. just depends on the topic under discussion ;)

Some people think Elvis is alive and living with Tupac and Biggy. Hypotheticals of what random people think isn't exactly relevant. Unless you have someone specific you're speaking about and have a specific comment by said individuals suggesting Natural = Normal.
 
*Able* to do something and *should* you do something are two different things.

If someone wants to risk insanely ugly babies and have sex with their sister ... I won't try and stop them.

It's wrong and disgusting though.

What's next? Mom sex?

Wasn't this the slippery slope argument from Fox news lol? You guys are proving Fox may have actually been right for once!
 
So once again you fling words on a post, and refuse to defend or support them. If I misunderstood what you were saying in the original quote, then please clarify your meaning. If I was right about my interpretation, then clarify that. There's little value in trying to interact with someone who will not stand by what he has written and answers questions with more questions.

@Wake: I'm still waiting for a response to Post #93.
 
So once again you fling words on a post, and refuse to defend or support them. If I misunderstood what you were saying in the original quote, then please clarify your meaning. If I was right about my interpretation, then clarify that. There's little value in trying to interact with someone who will not stand by what he has written and answers questions with more questions.

What do you want, Inquisitor?

Do you assume I must defend or support a point I post?

Your 2nd and 3rd sentences don't illuminate what they respond to.

You seek battle. I seek understanding. You argue. I question.
 
Back
Top Bottom