• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sarah Palin + Herman Cain, can it be an option for GOP?

Sarah Palin + Herman Cain in 2012, can it be an option for GOP?

  • Yes

    Votes: 9 45.0%
  • No

    Votes: 8 40.0%
  • I dunno

    Votes: 3 15.0%

  • Total voters
    20

Alfons

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 13, 2008
Messages
3,300
Reaction score
244
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
GOP has now a problem for potus candidate because there are too much RINOs inside the Grand Old Party who forget the values of Liberty, Christianity and Freedom. Unfortunately GOP is going more and more to became a classic liberal party, therefore it lost more and more supporters.

I sure Sarah and Hermann together can save America and the Christian Western World!


Also, what do you think, is it a good constellation to run in 2012 or not? Please vote and explain your choice.

flyflag.gif
 
Last edited:
GOP has now a problem for potus candidate because there are too much RINOs inside the Grand Old Party who forget the values of Liberty, Christianity and Freedom. Unfortunately GOP is going more and more to became a classic liberal party, therefore it lost more and more supporters. Also, what do you think, is it a good constellation to run in 2012 or not? Please vote and explain your choice.

I think your assessment is off.

I think the GOP has shifted so far right, it's alienated many independents who would otherwise support the notions of fiscal responsibility and "smaller government" (whatever that actually means anyway). Independents really don't like the far right christian stuff about banning gay marriage and abortion and I don't think Sarah Palin is part of the solution, she's part of the problem.

Democrats don't have to work as hard to tap into their base, republicans especially during the primaries have to go tits deep, and McCain proved that in the last election, and the fact is, that alienated independents come general election time.
 
Well, I wasn't really planning on voting in this election anyway.
 
Independents really don't like the far right christian stuff about banning gay marriage and abortion and I don't think Sarah Palin is part of the solution, she's part of the problem. .

If tiny amount of independents are against true Christians, for Homosexuality and Abortions, it is not the biggest problem for GOP.The true problem will be if GOP will try to change its politic to gain their minuscule votes, maybe 0,1 or 0,2 % , not more.

Only with Sarah GOP has a chance to win 2012, at best if Sarah run together with Cain.
 
If tiny amount of independents are against true Christians, for Homosexuality and Abortions, it is not the biggest problem for GOP.The true problem will be if GOP will try to change its politic to gain their minuscule votes, maybe 0,1 or 0,2 % , not more.

Only with Sarah GOP has a chance to win 2012, at best if Sarah run together with Cain.

Ah no, with sarah, they don't stand a chance in hell.

And there is no such thing as a true christian.
 
If tiny amount of independents are against true Christians, for Homosexuality and Abortions, it is not the biggest problem for GOP.The true problem will be if GOP will try to change its politic to gain their minuscule votes, maybe 0,1 or 0,2 % , not more.

Only with Sarah GOP has a chance to win 2012, at best if Sarah run together with Cain.

Independent voters are a lot more than 0.1%. If it were that small, Obama never would have gotten elected, as I'm fairly certain that 52% of the electorate is not liberal.

Sarah Palin makes independents (and in fact, most people with a brain) run and hide. If Obama's a praying man, he's praying he has to debate Sarah Palin. It'd be like the Orioles playing my son's baseball team.
 
Running Palin and Cain does one thing, it guarantees victory for the other side.
 
I think your assessment is off.

I think the GOP has shifted so far right, it's alienated many independents who would otherwise support the notions of fiscal responsibility and "smaller government" (whatever that actually means anyway). Independents really don't like the far right christian stuff about banning gay marriage and abortion and I don't think Sarah Palin is part of the solution, she's part of the problem.

Democrats don't have to work as hard to tap into their base, republicans especially during the primaries have to go tits deep, and McCain proved that in the last election, and the fact is, that alienated independents come general election time.
I think you're blowing smoke, and have nothing to back it up.
 
Sure its an option. One I hope the GOP exercises fully. Or they can run as a third party perhaps under the name of a beverage.
 
Also, what do you think, is it a good constellation to run in 2012 or not? Please vote and explain your choice.

I was never good at astronomy but where is Sarah Palin in the sky?
 
I voted yes because it would be an option for the GOP to be embarrassingly defeated.
 
No

Palin on the ticket would not be good at all
 
No way!

Sarah Palin is pretty dumb, so she will alienate anyone with a bran
Sarah Palin and Herman Cain are quite conservative so they will alienate independents.
Sarah Palin are not a good at interviews either

What GOP needs is a fiscal conservative with true conservative values (not a RINO like Mitt Romney), but also can keep himself somewhat moderate and is not dumb.
 
GOP has now a problem for potus candidate because there are too much RINOs inside the Grand Old Party who forget the values of Liberty, Christianity and Freedom. Unfortunately GOP is going more and more to became a classic liberal party, therefore it lost more and more supporters.



Also, what do you think, is it a good constellation to run in 2012 or not? Please vote and explain your choice.

flyflag.gif

Running Palin would guarantee Obama's 2nd term. The fact Palin is a blatant hypocrite and resigned as governor makes her too easy of a target for the opposition. Partisan hack retards love to paint the woman as an idiot even though she has accomplished more than they did, but these people are usually ignored.

If Cain wants a chance at winning then he should not pick Palin and even then he has only a slim chance of beating Obama.

These things that will work against him-

1.He is black. The libs will point out that the only reason the GOP is running him is because of his skin color. Even though libs basically did the same thing with Obama and a lot of people voted for Obama because they wanted to elect the first black man to office. Some libs may even try to paint him as a Uncle Tom as though black people are supposed to behave and act a certain way, but yet republicans get pegged as the racists. They nailed Allen Keys for being a hypocrite for his carpet bagging when he ran against Obama when sometime prior to this Keys spoke out against Hillary Clinton being a carpet bagger( a carpet bagger is a politician who runs for political office in a district they they do not live in or barely lived in.)

2.Cain is black,has not served in an elected political office. The republicans gave Obama **** for lack of executive experience. The democrats in turn will give Cain **** for his lack of elected political office experience.

3. Cain is successful rich businessman. Even though libs support illegal immigration just as much as republicans do which hurts American workers wages and because of Clinton allowing businesses to outsource left and right which also hurts American workers Cain will be seen as caring more about businesses than the Average American.




I sure Sarah and Hermann together can save America and the Christian Western World!

You are sadly mistaken if you think they care about Christians other than just trying to get their votes. Politicians wear religion on their sleeves for votes.
 
If it were that small, Obama never would have gotten elected, as I'm fairly certain that 52% of the electorate is not liberal..

Obama has gotten elected because he had promised anything and everybody!

 
wrong, a true christian is someone who follow the commandments of the Holy Bible.

I thought they all got raptured last week.

This Christian, true Christian, real Christian, born again Christian, is confusing. Have y'all got some sort of tally sheet so that you can classify and categorize who belongs to which and what?
 
wrong, a true christian is someone who follow the commandments of the Holy Bible.

Well I sure hope you haven't worked on Sunday or worn a garment made of two different threads lately, cause that means you should be put to death my friend.

According to the holy bible anyway.
 
Alfons I still have my doubts you are legit.
 
I think the GOP has shifted so far right. . .
I have to remind myself that those of you on the other side believe you are right.

In my opinion the Republican party, as well as the Democrat party have both moved left. The Democrats have moved quite a bit further left than the Republicans. Naturally, if you are a Democrat, you believe the Republicans have moved farther right. It is an artifact of how much further left Democrats are.
 
Last edited:
I have to remind myself that those of you on the other side believe you are right.

In my opinion the Republican party, as well as the Democrat party have both moved left. The Democrats have moved quite a bit further left that the Republicans. Naturally, if you are a Democrat, you believe the Republicans have moved farther right. It is an artifact of how much further left Democrats are.

Ok, let me ask you a question who created the EPA? Got us out of the Vietnam war? Told us it was imperative to keep Social Security and Medicare going? Added the most to the Medicare budget? Kept taxes up? Never wanted to go to war until around the 70s? Can you guess which party? Republicans had initially been restrictive on civil rights but have shifted into being normal. Most of their past policies though would be considered by many standards conservatives hold as liberal now. Perfect example look at Eisenhower on taxes or Nixon all together. Nixon is a bigger liberal than Obama by today's standards.
 
Ah no, with sarah, they don't stand a chance in hell.

And there is no such thing as a true christian.

Oh they do. She's a clear conservative that would have no problem dealing with Obama and his pathetic record. Unlike McCain who forgot to take his gloves off, Palin would go for the jugular, and not relent.

Obama has lost a huge portion of the I's and there's not much he can do to bring them back. His record is like a massive corpse that stinks... he can't hide it with magic tricks and perfume, and Palin wouldn't let him try to run away from it... as he did to all his anti-American comrades during the last election.

.
 
Not if the republicans are serious about winning back the White House and evicting the current tenant.
 
Oh they do. She's a clear conservative that would have no problem dealing with Obama and his pathetic record. Unlike McCain who forgot to take his gloves off, Palin would go for the jugular, and not relent.

Obama has lost a huge portion of the I's and there's not much he can do to bring them back. His record is like a massive corpse that stinks... he can't hide it with magic tricks and perfume, and Palin wouldn't let him try to run away from it... as he did to all his anti-American comrades during the last election.

.

And to that I would like to say she couldn't handle being the Gov in ALASKA... what gives you the confidence she can be the PRESIDENT OF THE USA? What if one of her kids gets all sad and pregnant, does she drop the ball again? Does she get all perplexed by Diane Sawyer asking her simple questions... making sure government is out of our lives and not making our medical decisions so long as it doesn't have anything to do with an abortion...
 
Back
Top Bottom