- Joined
- Jul 19, 2014
- Messages
- 62,963
- Reaction score
- 27,366
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Again, you clearly don't understand philosophy. If you did, you could demonstrate why it's invalid, yet you can't.
First of all, the premises can not be shown to be true. Right then and there, that blows it ot of the water. Next, it uses vague subjective terminology.
Third, the technique used can be used to show the exact opposite conclusion too.
It also depends on special pleading also... making a special case for the properties givein to "GOD" ..
Last edited: