- Joined
- Apr 29, 2012
- Messages
- 17,868
- Reaction score
- 8,353
- Location
- On an island. Not that one!
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
Yeah, we most certainly do.
You've got the wrong one.
Sir William Mitchell Ramsay (15 March 1851, Glasgow –20 April 1939) was a Scottish archaeologist and New Testament scholar. By his death in 1939 he had become the foremost authority of his day on the history of Asia Minor and a leading scholar in the study of the New Testament.
William Mitchell Ramsay - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Well that's what you think. Here's what the scholar Ramsay Said:
Ramsay, a former atheist, devoted his whole life to archaeology and determined that he would disprove the Bible.
He set out for the Holy Land and decided to disprove the book of Acts. After 25 or more years (he had released book after book during this time), he was incredibly impressed by the accuracy of Luke in his writings finally declaring that ‘Luke is a historian of the first rank; not merely are his statements of fact trustworthy’ . . . ‘this author should be placed along with the very greatest of historians’ . . . ‘Luke’s history is unsurpassed in respect of its trustworthiness.’
Archaeology Verifies Bible Ch2
Yes, I made a mistake when I noted that one William Ramsay was a chemist, Nobel Prize winner even. The other William Ramsay was an archaeologist, they were both British to add even more confusion. However, despite multiple claims by various apologists, there is zero evidence that Ramsay was ever an atheist or that his original intentions were to "disprove the Bible."
Yet another apologetic website claiming that "Archaeology Verifies Bible" when the real science of archaeology says only that it confirms SOME of the stuff we can read in the Bible. More often than not the digging has found artifacts and remains that contradict biblical tales.
Although