• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Running from the Resurrection [W: 646]

Logicman said:
What kind of proof are you expecting from a resurrected individual 2,000 years ago? Good luck with your disingenuous demand.
Click to expand...

youd think he would still be around
 
Logicman said:
Skeptics don't want the truth about Christ. They just want to bash it.
Click to expand...

or they would like the truth but just bash what you give instead
 
blarg said:
or they would like the truth but just bash what you give instead
Click to expand...

No, I was right the first time. Besides, you've already rejected the truth about Christ so you've already lost the argument.
 
Logicman said:
No, I was right the first time. Besides, you've already rejected the truth about Christ so you've already lost the argument.
Click to expand...

aww your adorable

but no christian claims about the resurrection are not proof and not agreeing with you doesn't automatically make any 1 wrong
 
Logicman said:
No, I was right the first time. Besides, you've already rejected the truth about Christ so you've already lost the argument.
Click to expand...

If you claim to have the truth then try and prove it.
Claiming others have to disprove you or you are right is not logical
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom