• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

European Atheist Marxist philosophers embrace Christianity

RGacky3 said:
That's like asking "who's philosophy" or "whose art history" ...

theology has a history and has a methodology ....
Click to expand...
Yeah, and if somebody doesn't completely agree with you they are wrong.

I have heard your shtick before. Do yourself a favor, save your breath.
 
CLAX1911 said:
Yeah, and if somebody doesn't completely agree with you they are wrong.

I have heard your shtick before. Do yourself a favor, save your breath.
Click to expand...

You still crying? Come back when you have an argument and not just whining.
 
RGacky3 said:
Start With Augustine and read, figure it out yourself.
Click to expand...

Due to lack of evidence of "God's" existence I have "figured out" myself that there is no such a thing. Christianity may have played a role in freedom but that does not changes the fact that it is a make believe club.
 
CLAX1911 said:
I did, came to a different conclusion, and thus am wrong according to you.

Why don't you start by stepping off your high horse.
Click to expand...

Really .. .you read Augustine? Which Works?
 
CLAX1911 said:
Who is? You?
Click to expand...

I think the Anglicans and the RCC are probably more accurate when it comes to scholarship. .. at least the ones that have their TH.D from a repututable school.

Some of the seminaries in the u.s. are more than a little bit doggy. I would definitely avoid using as a source anybody that is associated with the Florida Theological Seminary, Chicago Theological Seminary, and Dallas Theological Seminary.
 
RAMOSS said:
I think the Anglicans and the RCC are probably more accurate when it comes to scholarship. .. at least the ones that have their TH.D from a repututable school.

Some of the seminaries in the u.s. are more than a little bit doggy. I would definitely avoid using as a source anybody that is associated with the Florida Theological Seminary, Chicago Theological Seminary, and Dallas Theological Seminary.
Click to expand...
Good to know.
 
RAMOSS said:
I think the Anglicans and the RCC are probably more accurate when it comes to scholarship. .. at least the ones that have their TH.D from a repututable school.

Some of the seminaries in the u.s. are more than a little bit doggy. I would definitely avoid using as a source anybody that is associated with the Florida Theological Seminary, Chicago Theological Seminary, and Dallas Theological Seminary.
Click to expand...

I totally agree, unfortunately some of the American evangelical semilaries have become more apologetic institutions rather than actual unbiased institutions of scholarship. Catholics and Anglican's however tend to be a lot better, that being said some evangelical scholars are really really helpful and do great scholarship.
 
RGacky3 said:
I totally agree, unfortunately some of the American evangelical semilaries have become more apologetic institutions rather than actual unbiased institutions of scholarship. Catholics and Anglican's however tend to be a lot better, that being said some evangelical scholars are really really helpful and do great scholarship.
Click to expand...

When it comes to the Evangelical scholars, I have to judge them one at a time.. there are so many bad ones out there. Usually, the ones that are really bad think they are the hottest thing since sliced bread.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom