• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

The Theory of Chaotic Inflation

rhinefire

rhinefire

DP Veteran
Joined
May 3, 2007
Messages
10,399
Reaction score
3,020
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Independent
This theory states simply if I understand it, is the universe or any universe is vey easy to create using only an tiny bit of matter so small it is barely measurable. This generates a micro amount of vacuum that explodes creating a universe. This is in a small way connected to the theory that our universe is simply a computer generated entity, which I do not totally discard. The theoretical physicists would back this up as they believe we can or will be capable of creating a solar system and if so why then not a universe? Obviously this is down the road a piece but it is plausible. My question would be "how do you create a universe if you are already in one"?
 
There are a few glaring inaccuracies here. First, the universe was not created, and if it was, it was not "easy". I'm not sure who told you it was easy, but I'm willing to bet whoever said that didn't create a universe himself. If it was easy we'd all do it. Second, it was not a tiny amount of matter, it was ALL the matter that exists in the universe simply compressed. The big bang did not create matter.

And no, no respected physicists thinks that we can currently create a solar system, nor that we'll even be able to do it within a thousand years. Why don't we focus on colonizing another planet first?
 
RabidAlpaca said:
There are a few glaring inaccuracies here. First, the universe was not created, and if it was, it was not "easy". I'm not sure who told you it was easy, but I'm willing to bet whoever said that didn't create a universe himself. If it was easy we'd all do it. Second, it was not a tiny amount of matter, it was ALL the matter that exists in the universe simply compressed. The big bang did not create matter.
Click to expand...

First off, try reading the post before replying as it is "theory" not fact. The universe was not created, really? Who is "himself", a guy? Also, matter was "formed" years after as a result of the initial creation ( I hate the term "bang").

And no, no respected physicists thinks that we can currently create a solar system, nor that we'll even be able to do it within a thousand years. Why don't we focus on colonizing another planet first?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Read Kaku then reply and learn to separate theory from fact.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom