• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

When, if ever, do you feel stealing is morally okay?

Excon said:
:doh
Still presenting an irrelevant comparison, huh?
Figures that is what a person who exaggerates would do. :lamo
Click to expand...

You can't explain to irrelevance. OK. I accept your surrender.
 
calamity said:
You can't explain to irrelevance. OK. I accept your surrender.
Click to expand...
Now you are just confused.
What was it about; "I do not need to answer your stupid question as that is not what happened.", that you do not understand?

as that is not what happened.
You are exaggerating.
Therefore you are the one who is wrong.

The majority of the land was bought and ceded.

Your defeat has long been duly noted.
 
Excon said:
Now you are just confused.
What was it about; "I do not need to answer your stupid question as that is not what happened.", that you do not understand?

as that is not what happened.
You are exaggerating.
Therefore you are the one who is wrong.

The majority of the land was bought and ceded.

Your defeat has long been duly noted.
Click to expand...

You are wrong. And, what's worse. You are afraid to try explaining the difference between stealing land by the end of a gun and stealing a wallet. Last chance.

Why are you afraid?
 
calamity said:
You are wrong. And, what's worse. You are afraid to try explaining the difference between stealing land by the end of a gun and stealing a wallet. Last chance.

Why are you afraid?
Click to expand...
YOu must not know how to read. The explanation was already given.
That is not what happened, and as such, is irrelevant.
But you are obviously unable to understand that.
Which is to be expected of a person who dishonestly exaggerates.
And because you do such, you are wrong.
And the only fear here is you not wanting to admit you are mistaken wrong.
But don't fret. It's not like you would be admitting anything that most don't already know. iLOL
 
Excon said:
YOu must not know how to read. The explanation was already given.
That is not what happened, and as such, is irrelevant.
But you are obviously unable to understand that.
Which is to be expected of a person who dishonestly exaggerates.
And because you do such, you are wrong.
And the only fear here is you not wanting to admit you are mistaken wrong.
But don't fret. It's not like you would be admitting anything that most don't already know. iLOL
Click to expand...

You are obviously incapable of explaining your position. Therefore it is not worth listening too. In other words, who cares what you think since you can's substantiate your claims.

The country was stolen. I've shown how and when and by who. You...you got nothing.
 
calamity said:
You are obviously incapable of explaining your position.
Click to expand...
:doh
Said the one who apparently can't read.


calamity said:
The country was stolen.
Click to expand...
An untrue exaggeration. A lie.
You should stop exaggerating and telling untruths.
The majority of the land was bought and ceded.



calamity said:
I've shown how and when and by who. .
Click to expand...
You have shown absolutely nothing to support your false claim.
'The land was not stolen. The majority was bought and ceded.
As already shown.

500px-Territorial-acquisition-uscensus-bureau.jpg
 
Excon said:
:doh
Said the one who apparently can't read.


An untrue exaggeration. A lie.
You should stop exaggerating and telling untruths.
The majority of the land was bought and ceded.



You have shown absolutely nothing to support your false claim.
'The land was not stolen. The majority was bought and ceded.
As already shown.

500px-Territorial-acquisition-uscensus-bureau.jpg
Click to expand...
Bwahhhaaaa...yeah "bought or ceded," if you ignore the Indians' property rights (er lack of them) altogether. Good one.


The country was stolen. Very little of it was not.
 
calamity said:
The country was stolen. Very little of it was not.
Click to expand...
:lamo
Showing your ignorance of the topic again I see.

The majority of the land was bought and ceded.
 
Excon said:
:lamo
Showing your ignorance of the topic again I see.

The majority of the land was bought and ceded.
Click to expand...

Only if you discount the existence of Indians and any right they have to their land.
 
calamity said:
Only if you discount the existence of Indians and any right they have to their land.
Click to expand...

Wrong again and again showing your ignorance of the topic. Figures.

The majority of the land was bought and ceded.
 
Excon said:
Wrong again and again showing your ignorance of the topic. Figures.

The majority of the land was bought and ceded.
Click to expand...
Stolen from Indians who you seem to think had no rights to it.

When is stealing morally ok?

Excon: When it's land, which belongs to Indians.
 
calamity said:
Stolen from Indians who you seem to think had no rights to it.

When is stealing morally ok?

Excon: When it's land, which belongs to Indians.
Click to expand...
:doh:doh:doh
There you go with more absurdities.

Which is expected of a person who dishonestly exaggerates as you have done.

Figures.
You are wrong.
The majority of the land was bought and ceded.
Stop exaggerating and there is no issue.
 
Excon said:
:doh:doh:doh
There you go with more absurdities.

Which is expected of a person who dishonestly exaggerates as you have done.

Figures.
You are wrong.
The majority of the land was bought and ceded.
Stop exaggerating and there is no issue.
Click to expand...
The Indians did not sell nor cede a majority of the land. In fact, the map you show above does not even mention them. How do you explain that?

The country was stolen from Indians. You have shown us nothing which disputes this very well known fact.
 
calamity said:
The Indians did not sell nor cede a majority of the land. In fact, the map you show above does not even mention them. How do you explain that?

The country was stolen from Indians. You have shown us nothing which disputes this very well known fact.
Click to expand...
You are still being dishonest and exaggerating.
The majority of the land was bought and ceded.
 
Excon said:
You are still being dishonest and exaggerating.
The majority of the land was bought and ceded.
Click to expand...

So you admit you discount the Indians.
 
calamity said:
So you admit you discount the Indians.
Click to expand...
More dishonesty from the one who exaggerates. Figures.
Get a grip and stop exaggerating.
And while you are at it stop suggesting someone is saying something they haven't.
It is also dishonest and in-line expected of one who exaggerates.
 
Excon said:
More dishonesty from the one who exaggerates. Figures.
Get a grip and stop exaggerating.
And while you are at it stop suggesting someone is saying something they haven't.
It is also dishonest and in-line expected of one who exaggerates.
Click to expand...

You can run from the Indian issue, but you cannot hide. Their land was stolen.

I showed you how Oklahoma was stolen from them, here's another.
Black Hills Land Claim - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The treaty recognized the Sioux territory of the Black Hills which were located between the North Platte River and Yellowstone River and obligated the government to pay $50,000 annually.[11] However, a United States military war against Red Cloud proved to be a victory for the Sioux, which resulted in the Treaty of Fort Laramie (1868). This treaty ultimately protected the Black Hills from white settlement.

The treaty was violated when gold was discovered in Montana in 1874. However, the Sioux did not face intruders until Brevet Major General George Armstrong Custer and his army entered the Black Hills in 1874 and publicly announced their discovery of gold. By 1875 the announcement led to the establishment of large mining towns, such as Deadwood, Central City and Lead within the Black Hills.[16] Accordingly, the United States unilaterally imposed the Manypenny Agreement, claimed the land, and officially removed the Black Hills by passing the Congressional Act of February 28, 1877.

The February Act of 1877 is the most controversial treaty regarding the Black Hills land claims. The treaty officially took away Sioux land...
Click to expand...

See. The land was stolen.
 
calamity said:
You can run from the Indian issue, but you cannot hide.
Click to expand...
:lamo
Run and hide?
More delusions from you?

I am right here pointing out that you are exaggerating.

That is not running or hiding.


calamity said:
Their land was stolen.
Click to expand...
The majority was bought and ceded.
So stop exaggerating.


calamity said:
I showed you how Oklahoma was stolen from them, here's another.

See. The land was stolen.
Click to expand...
You showed, you showed. iLOL :doh
You do not know what you are showing. And what you have provided certainly does not disprove the fact that the majority of the land was bought or ceded.



The majority was bought and ceded.
So stop exaggerating.
 
Excon said:
:lamo
Run and hide?
More delusions from you?

I am right here pointing out that you are exaggerating.

That is not running or hiding.



The majority was bought and ceded.
So stop exaggerating.



You showed, you showed. iLOL :doh
You do not know what you are showing. And what you have provided certainly does not disprove the fact that the majority of the land was bought or ceded.



The majority was bought and ceded.
So stop exaggerating.
Click to expand...

bullcrap

You're denying facts put right in front of your nose.
 
calamity said:
bullcrap

You're denying facts put right in front of your nose.
Click to expand...
Wrong.
I am not denying anything.
You are the one in denial of your exaggeration.


The majority was bought and ceded.
So stop exaggerating.
 
Excon said:
Wrong.
I am not denying anything.
You are the one in denial of your exaggeration.


The majority was bought and ceded.
So stop exaggerating.
Click to expand...
Not true.
 
Excon said:
:doh Yes true.
The majority was bought and ceded.
So stop exaggerating and being dishonest about it.
Click to expand...

Nope. Not true. Land was stolen.
 
calamity said:
Land was stolen.
Click to expand...
You are wrong, and your dishonesty is showing again.

The following, all of which were dishonest exaggerations, is not the same as the above underlined claim.
calamity said:
You live in a country that was stolen.
Click to expand...
calamity said:
stolen from coast to coast.
Click to expand...
calamity said:
The whole country was stolen.
Click to expand...
calamity said:
The country was stolen. Very little of it was not.
Click to expand...
None of the above quotes were true.
The majority was bought and ceded.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom