Recommend a course of action it this ever happens. Broadcast it to the world, shut it up and never tell, put the remains on display for all the world to see?
Recommend a course of action it this ever happens. Broadcast it to the world, shut it up and never tell, put the remains on display for all the world to see?
Not care....... I dont see how it would have any significants whatsoever. Religious people will keep being religious, and atheists like me will stay atheists.
Since most people wouldn't even believe me, I'd just re-bury the remains. I'm not interested in fifteen minutes of that kind of fame.
Recommend a course of action it this ever happens. Broadcast it to the world, shut it up and never tell, put the remains on display for all the world to see?
I have to assume the scenario is there's a way to prove they are the remains of Christ beyond any doubt. In such a case, I think it would be important to publish the findings, though I would do so through a university by assembling a team of scholars and anthropologists so as to dilute the infamy that Tigger mentioned.
Tigger said:All that would do is increase the number of people who the Infamy would affect, not reduce or dilute it. The "righteous indignation" of the religious is an unrelenting storm. The only question is how many people would the rain of hatred fall upon?
To me, truth is worth paying any price.
To me, truth is worth paying any price.
That's fine. We all have our own views on how religion and science interact...
Dezaad said:I believe this as well. However, I have become disillusioned enough to know that this irrefutable evidence would at best simply turn people to a different religion. It would simply be one less amenable to refutation, probably Islam. What a horrible prospect.
But in the end I would reluctantly do the same as you. If mankind cannot handle reality then we can't handle reality and that is that. If there is to be any hope at all, it lies in giving mankind the opportunity to rise to whatever the current occasion presents.
How could we possibly discover the remains of Christ?
One thing I've refrained from mentioning so far is this: I understand why some sects of Christianity would be upset about such a finding. Those sects include as a piece of fundamental doctrine the notion that the events in the Bible, and especially the Gospels, report historical events (in roughly the sense conveyed by something like the NIV or King James translations, or something). If Jesus ascended to heaven, he did so bodily (say these sects) and finding his skeleton would prove otherwise.
But with such a discovery, there's no reason one would or should stop being a Christian. The core of Christianity began as essentially mystical, and that's all still there, though very few people seem aware of it these days.
How would you know it was Christ?
Dezaad said:The people who believe what you mention are people who want to believe in simplified (aka fundamentalist) doctrine. I doubt that the type of people who like to believe in such extremes that surround fundamentalist thinking would be satisfied by more reasonable forms of Christianity. That type of person will eventually seek elsewhere for their hearts desire to find fertile ground and blossom.
Shouldn't this be in science fiction?
The "remains" of the Christ do not exist and never did.....
If you believe then his body and soul were returned to heaven, so there are no remains.'
If you do not believe that faith or any faith then there was no Christ, just a guy named Jesus, whose remains would be unidentifiable as there is no DNA with with to compare.
Christ is not a name by the way, but a title, as in "savior". He name was Jesus of Nazareth or Jesus son of Joseph.