• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Value of Human Life

Say there is a green car. Do we get to see whichever color we subjective wish for the car?

No, that doesn't mean it's objective ...
 
No, that doesn't mean it's objective ...

It is within human objectivity. Whether it is between human objectivity, due to lack of proper instruments, the issue is unknown. At best you are appealing to unknown.
 
But even if instruments to see through the eyes of men lack that does not mean that there are biologically strong indicators that we all see the same color! The receptors that detect wavelengths and pigments are generally the same between humans also.
 
No, that doesn't mean it's objective ...
It's just as objective as every other sensor is. When I go outside and look up, a cloudless sky in daytime is blue. If we're outside together we will agree that the sky is blue, assuming our sensors are both in good working order. What we see in our mind's eye has little to do with the fact that the sky is blue and that every other human who's sensor is in good working order will also confirm it's blue.
 
No ... the color doesn't exist, only light waves exist, what we call color is qualia, i.e. something we interperate, in nature the color itself doesn't exist.

But it still exists objectively.
 
Back
Top Bottom