idk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
- Messages
- 688
- Reaction score
- 270
- Location
- various spots across the country
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
This is just another argument from popularity. I provided a link to its definition, but you should do some research into logical fallacies because they are an immediate roadblock to logical discourse on complex topics such as this. People spread and repeat misinformation religiously (pun intended) and I don't see how Jesus' claim to be the Son of God is unique in any way. The Kim family in North Korea have claimed as much for generations and receive adoration from an entire nation of people, but because Jesus made his claim at a time when it could be taken seriously and gained traction, he wasn't deluded? Popularity is by no means proof of veracity. And I certainly don't look to US Politicians as my guide to truth.I don't know the answer to your first question, I only know that I seem to be able to choose freely. If a parent gives a child the freedom to make choices, in most cases, the parent has the ability to influence the outcome. Now imagine if that parent was perfect, with the possibility to work within or without the confines of time and certain dimensions.
In regards to your second paragraph, I'm assuming since Jesus is the most talked about figure in history that he wasn't just any common prophet. I don't think most prophets claimed to be the Son of God, which would normally totally disqualify a person from any rational discourse. Have you ever wondered why so many smart and well respected people believe in Him, including many, if not most, US Presidents? When I first read the New Testament, I wondered why anyone would make it up. Do you know why? What did Jesus gain from all of it if only a mere mortal? What did Paul gain? Instead of a scam, it seemed to me like a very compelling story for why and how we should love others. For example, "Love thy neighbor", or the Golden Rule, I think is the best basic law to ultimately ensure a happy and well run society.
I blanked Christianity. You can fill that blank with whichever religion you choose, and I've heard that exact sentence from a follower of your chosen religion. I don't need to provide proof for others' religions, followers need to provide proof to me. They're the ones basing laws and governments on the commandments of their God. They're positing his existence. The burden of proof is on the one who claims existence of the seemingly nonexistent.I don't know what to tell you about the other religions as I haven't studied them all. _________ has been the best philosophy I've found and I haven't seen any compelling evidence to get me to switch to another, unless you would care to share it with me.