• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Funny Atheist Pictures

What is there to gain from it?

It helps no one.

I say this with respect: one can have contempt for religion while not mocking/hurting others.

I'm religious and on one side, I find some mocking of religion in general tasteless and needlessly aggressive. Especially when the "arguments" made are missing the point and misrepresenting the respective religion.

On the other side, I think it is absolutely legitimate and maybe even necessary to mock religious fanatics, who give religion a bad name. For example, I see no problem mocking the belief of fundamentalists who deny scientific findings such as evolution. It may be unjust to mock religion in general, but it's certainly neither blasphemy nor unfair when certain religious nuts are mocked for their absurd interpretations of their religion.

I just feel it's sad when those doing the mocking are not aware that religion doesn't necessarily have to be of the fundamentalist anti-science brand. But hey, I guess we religious people have it coming, when we don't work harder giving religion a good name.
 
I just feel it's sad when those doing the mocking are not aware that religion doesn't necessarily have to be of the fundamentalist anti-science brand. But hey, I guess we religious people have it coming, when we don't work harder giving religion a good name.

I will always (or at least I foresee myself at this point always) mock Scientology.
 
I don't really consider Scientology a religion. It's more like an exploitive business model.

That pretty much describes most of the major religions, doesn't it?
 
I don't really consider Scientology a religion. It's more like an exploitive business model.

Merriam Webset said:
re·li·gion [ri-lij-uh n]noun
1. a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.

Religion | Define Religion at Dictionary.com

Beliefs concerning the cause? Check.
Purpose? Check.
Superhuman agency (or agencies)? Check.
Devotion / Ritual observances? Check.
Moral code? Check.

Religion it is. Sorry.
 
Didn't Germany rule something like that?

Yes, I think so.

IMO, exploitive business practizes that are illegal should not get a free pass, just because they're operating under the label of religion -- no matter if it's Scientology or any other, maybe more traditional religious sect.
 
Religion | Define Religion at Dictionary.com

Beliefs concerning the cause? Check.
Purpose? Check.
Superhuman agency (or agencies)? Check.
Devotion / Ritual observances? Check.
Moral code? Check.

Religion it is. Sorry.

You are completely missing the point. Scientology also financially exploits its members and even uses violence, libel and slander to attack those who attempt to leave that community. That's the problem, no matter how you classify them on other fields.
 
You are completely missing the point. Scientology also financially exploits its members and even uses violence, libel and slander to attack those who attempt to leave that community. That's the problem, no matter how you classify them on other fields.

Ok so it's a vengeful religion. It's still a religion.
 
No, it does not.

Considering just about all of the religions out there have their hands out for your money, while not wanting to pay any taxes for any of their financial holdings, sounds like a dishonest business to me.
 
You are completely missing the point. Scientology also financially exploits its members and even uses violence, libel and slander to attack those who attempt to leave that community. That's the problem, no matter how you classify them on other fields.

I've never seen a religion that didn't operate that way.

Also, isn't this thread for funny pictures?

hell-good-company.jpg
 
Oh, and on the subject of mocking things.

1. Things that are ridiculous should be mocked. That's how you should the ridiculousness. Or more specifically, they should be ridiculed.

2. Most mocking is, in fact, criticism. And every idea should be subject to criticism. Every. Single. One. Mockery is just criticism with a specific tone. Sometimes it's derisive. Sometimes it's silly. But the central theme is just criticism. And anyone whose opinions, ideas, or beliefs cannot stand up to criticism should get new opinions, ideas, or beliefs. Criticism is how we refine our ideas. It's like the scientific method.

3. Making fun of something is a whole lot better than killing them. This is first a major step up from how people reacted to ideas they didn't like for most of human history, but also a point for atheists over the religious. We don't kill or torture people in order to prove our point about spiritual beliefs being wrong. The religious have been doing that for thousands of years. We mock the religious when we disagree with them. They murdered us when they disagreed with us. Makes it pretty clear who the good guys are, huh?

4. Some jokes are funny to some people, and not funny to others. Even jokes about people hanging on crosses are funny to some people. Just because you don't think it's funny doesn't mean that it's wrong to make the joke. No one has the right to not be offended, and if your position is subject to someone else's mockery, maybe you should re-evaluate your position.

So sayeth Pasch.

non-golf-players.jpg

Golf players need to keep their golf balls out of our windows, and grow some fortitude so that they don't flip out when we laugh at their silly hats.
 
funny-atheist-pics-033.jpg
 
Oh, and on the subject of mocking things.

1. Things that are ridiculous should be mocked. That's how you should the ridiculousness. Or more specifically, they should be ridiculed.

2. Most mocking is, in fact, criticism. And every idea should be subject to criticism. Every. Single. One. Mockery is just criticism with a specific tone. Sometimes it's derisive. Sometimes it's silly. But the central theme is just criticism. And anyone whose opinions, ideas, or beliefs cannot stand up to criticism should get new opinions, ideas, or beliefs. Criticism is how we refine our ideas. It's like the scientific method.

Don't get me wrong: When we're talking about genuine religious fanatics, I agree with you.

But criticism that makes more than obvious that those advancing it have not the slightest bit of understanding about the target of their mockery, makes them look silly.

I think 90% of the "funny" pictures here are based on strawman misrepresentations of religion, like for example the absurd idea that religion always claims to contradict science and trumps it, totally ignoring that the vast majority of religious people are neither Christian fundamentalists nor orthodox Muslims and thus don't make that claim. Or on a naive childlike approach to the theodicy question.

So don't fool yourself. I think you know as well as I do, that this isn't about rational arguments or the noble cause of spreading rational thinking. Most of the time, it's about poking cheap fun at something you don't understand.

3. Making fun of something is a whole lot better than killing them. This is first a major step up from how people reacted to ideas they didn't like for most of human history, but also a point for atheists over the religious. We don't kill or torture people in order to prove our point about spiritual beliefs being wrong. The religious have been doing that for thousands of years. We mock the religious when we disagree with them. They murdered us when they disagreed with us. Makes it pretty clear who the good guys are, huh?

Yeah right, because, you know, the vast majority of religious people don't argue, but simply kill their opponents.

This "argument" is so silly, it makes my brain bleed.

It's fascinating that really good, rational people who usually take care to make really good arguments, suddenly become not much more than schoolyard bullies the moment religion is the topic.

4. Some jokes are funny to some people, and not funny to others. Even jokes about people hanging on crosses are funny to some people. Just because you don't think it's funny doesn't mean that it's wrong to make the joke. No one has the right to not be offended, and if your position is subject to someone else's mockery, maybe you should re-evaluate your position.

I don't think anybody here claimed that you guys don't have the right to make these jokes.

I even found some of them funny. A lot of them are funny, as long as you have in mind they target only religious people with a particular interpretation of their respective religion (like people who actually believe their religion is in contradiction to science and trumps it). What I find not so funny is that some doing the mocking apparently don't understand that not all religious people are like that.
 
I've never seen a religion that didn't operate that way.

Also, isn't this thread for funny pictures?

View attachment 67137023

Personally that pic seems tasteless and lame. IF Hell exists, they'll be in the roaster with everyone else, including murderers, rapists, etc.
 
Personally that pic seems tasteless and lame. IF Hell exists, they'll be in the roaster with everyone else, including murderers, rapists, etc.

Heaven is hotter than Hell, champ. Some atheist. :roll:
 
Heaven is hotter than Hell, champ. Some atheist. :roll:

The picture itself makes a comment on "if" Hell exists.

Though I'm an atheist, it's still something interesting to ponder on.
 
The picture itself makes a comment on "if" Hell exists.

Though I'm an atheist, it's still something interesting to ponder on.

IF Hell exists, you'd roast in both heaven or hell so, you'll be roasting no matter what.
 
IF Hell exists, you'd roast in both heaven or hell so, you'll be roasting no matter what.

But the quality of roasting in the depths of Hades involves a sea of fire. Last I checked there Heaven doesn't have that big of a roaster. :lol:
 
But the quality of roasting in the depths of Hades involves a sea of fire. Last I checked there Heaven doesn't have that big of a roaster. :lol:

Then you missed this picture:

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1351714088.200910.jpg
 
That reminds me. In the bible it's mentioned that Heaven has streets made of gold. Makes me think that was written by man, because only man would think gold has value. If Heaven does exist, why not have streets made out of diamond, platinum, or some other gemstones?
 
But the quality of roasting in the depths of Hades involves a sea of fire. Last I checked there Heaven doesn't have that big of a roaster. :lol:

So I guess roasted demon isn't on the menu? in heaven
 
Back
Top Bottom