| Off topic discussion A question for Gun knowledgable people.; I'm fairly ignorant about the different uses of a gun, and the type of wounds that are left by ... |
07-23-08, 01:22 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | The Image b4 Transition
Join Date: Jan 2007 Last Online: Today 02:25 AM Location: beneath the surface
Posts: 2,628
Thanks: 434
Thanked 592 Times in 426 Posts
Gender: 
Current Mood: | A question for Gun knowledgable people. I'm fairly ignorant about the different uses of a gun, and the type of wounds that are left by certain guns, so here is a question for those that are much more knowledgable than I:
If someone were to shoot himself in the head (thru the mouth) with an M-16 rifle, will there be a bullet hole in the exit wound? Or will the recoil of the rifle make some sort of explosion, like a shotgun at close range? Like tearing tissue as the bullet exits the head?
Also, an M-16 being about 40-inches long, how long does your arms have to be in order for you to successfully mount a M-16 into your mouth?
The reason why I am asking these questions is because of an investigation that I'm reading at the moment, which I will disclose later in the thread, after this discussion have gone on at least 2 pages. This investigation involves foul play, and the above questions are related to the disputes in the investigation.
__________________ "My trade is to say what I think" - Voltaire |
| |
07-23-08, 08:47 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Professor
Join Date: Sep 2005 Last Online: Today 02:05 AM
Posts: 1,529
Thanks: 735
Thanked 508 Times in 328 Posts
Lean: Libertarian Gender:  Awards: | Re: A question for Gun knowledgable people. Quote: |
If someone were to shoot himself in the head (thru the mouth) with an M-16 rifle, will there be a bullet hole in the exit wound? Or will the recoil of the rifle make some sort of explosion, like a shotgun at close range? Like tearing tissue as the bullet exits the head?
| I'm not exactly sure what you are asking, but an exit wound such as the one you were describing would be quite large. The overall wound itself, depending upon its trajectory and path through the head, would exhibit a cone-like shape, the narrowest point being at the site of entry and expanding into its widest point upon exiting the head. The thing one must remember about bullet wounds is that the exit wound is always substantially larger than the entry wound.
Furthermore, the compensator (the last one inch of the six-inch barrel) of an M-16 rifle is designed to re-direct the hot, gasoues discharge outward instead of in the direction of fire; it is designed this way in order to conceal the origin of fire. The reason I bring this up is because if the weapon were fired while inside the victim's mouth there would be a substantial amount of second and third degrees burns radiating outward from the point of entry. The teeth should also have a coating of carbon residue, which would have blackened them. Quote: |
Also, an M-16 being about 40-inches long, how long does your arms have to be in order for you to successfully mount a M-16 into your mouth?
| I'm not sure of an exact measurement but I would venture to say that they only need to be long enough to reach the trigger, which isn't very long at all. I'd say just about anyone over five feet tall could easily mount an M-16 in their mouths. |
| | | The Following User Says Thank You to Ethereal For This Useful Post: | |
07-24-08, 11:04 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Intellectual Barbarian
Join Date: Oct 2006 Last Online: Yesterday 08:42 PM Location: California
Posts: 1,925
Thanks: 25
Thanked 492 Times in 313 Posts
Lean: Independent Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: A question for Gun knowledgable people. Ethereal is correct to the best of my knowledge. Its about 25 inches from the barrel of the m16 to the trigger. I experimented with a yardstick and its quite easy to reach something that is longer than your arms. By leaning back or squatting I could easily put the yardstick at my nose and reach beyond the 34 inches of the yardstick. I'm 5'10 and my arms are 27 inches from armpit to fingertip. I'd estimate that nearly any adult could shoot themselves in the mouth with proper positioning.
__________________ He'd be right at home on some ancient battlefield, swinging an axe into somebody's face. |
| |
07-24-08, 11:07 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | 1.20.13
Join Date: Sep 2007 Last Online: Today 11:14 AM Location: Chill this is only the internet.
Posts: 12,934
Thanks: 1,000
Thanked 1,709 Times in 1,244 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative Gender:  Awards:
Current Mood: | Re: A question for Gun knowledgable people. Quote:
Originally Posted by Lightdemon I'm fairly ignorant about the different uses of a gun, and the type of wounds that are left by certain guns, so here is a question for those that are much more knowledgable than I:
If someone were to shoot himself in the head (thru the mouth) with an M-16 rifle, will there be a bullet hole in the exit wound? Or will the recoil of the rifle make some sort of explosion, like a shotgun at close range? Like tearing tissue as the bullet exits the head?
Also, an M-16 being about 40-inches long, how long does your arms have to be in order for you to successfully mount a M-16 into your mouth?
The reason why I am asking these questions is because of an investigation that I'm reading at the moment, which I will disclose later in the thread, after this discussion have gone on at least 2 pages. This investigation involves foul play, and the above questions are related to the disputes in the investigation. |
first: http://www.ammo-oracle.com/body.htm
second:
How long is the barrel? Overall length is ambiguous. does it have a flash hider?
Was it an a2, a1, m4? Which variant?
third:
What type of ammo? 55gr fragmenting type will differ from 62gr m855 read my link
fourth:
it would either go completley through OR rattle around the brain housing group. Read my link. it will tell you EVERYTHING you need to know about 5.56
__________________ كافر Never forget those who died.
Never forget those who killed them.
Last edited by Reverend_Hellh0und : 07-24-08 at 11:09 AM.
|
| |
07-24-08, 02:29 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | The Image b4 Transition
Join Date: Jan 2007 Last Online: Today 02:25 AM Location: beneath the surface
Posts: 2,628
Thanks: 434
Thanked 592 Times in 426 Posts
Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: A question for Gun knowledgable people. Quote:
Originally Posted by Ethereal I'm not exactly sure what you are asking, but an exit wound such as the one you were describing would be quite large. The overall wound itself, depending upon its trajectory and path through the head, would exhibit a cone-like shape, the narrowest point being at the site of entry and expanding into its widest point upon exiting the head. The thing one must remember about bullet wounds is that the exit wound is always substantially larger than the entry wound. | So the exit wound must be much larger than the bullet itself?
Does that matter if a different type of bullet was used?
Can we compare an M-16 rifle's exit wound to one made by a hand-gun? Would the distiction be obvious? |
| |
07-24-08, 02:32 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | 1.20.13
Join Date: Sep 2007 Last Online: Today 11:14 AM Location: Chill this is only the internet.
Posts: 12,934
Thanks: 1,000
Thanked 1,709 Times in 1,244 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative Gender:  Awards:
Current Mood: | Re: A question for Gun knowledgable people. Quote:
Originally Posted by Lightdemon So the exit wound must be much larger than the bullet itself? | Read the Ammo oracle.
It depends on bullet type and expansion. Quote: |
Does that matter if a different type of bullet was used?
| Yes. see my post and the ammo Oracle. Quote: |
Can we compare an M-16 rifle's exit wound to one made by a hand-gun? Would the distiction be obvious?
|
Depends on the hand gun, caliber, and other factors. |
| |
07-24-08, 02:32 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | The Image b4 Transition
Join Date: Jan 2007 Last Online: Today 02:25 AM Location: beneath the surface
Posts: 2,628
Thanks: 434
Thanked 592 Times in 426 Posts
Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: A question for Gun knowledgable people. Quote:
Originally Posted by Reverend_Hellh0und first: http://www.ammo-oracle.com/body.htm
second:
How long is the barrel? Overall length is ambiguous. does it have a flash hider?
Was it an a2, a1, m4? Which variant?
third:
What type of ammo? 55gr fragmenting type will differ from 62gr m855 read my link
fourth:
it would either go completley through OR rattle around the brain housing group. Read my link. it will tell you EVERYTHING you need to know about 5.56 |
Unfortunately I don't have that type of detailed information.
All I know is that the victim is killed through the mouth, and the alleged weapon used is an M-16. But it is speculated to be a handgun instead because of the exit wound. |
| |
07-24-08, 02:34 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | 1.20.13
Join Date: Sep 2007 Last Online: Today 11:14 AM Location: Chill this is only the internet.
Posts: 12,934
Thanks: 1,000
Thanked 1,709 Times in 1,244 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative Gender:  Awards:
Current Mood: | Re: A question for Gun knowledgable people. Quote:
Originally Posted by Lightdemon Unfortunately I don't have that type of detailed information.
All I know is that the victim is killed through the mouth, and the alleged weapon used is an M-16. But it is speculated to be a handgun instead because of the exit wound. |
Do you have a picture.
and barrel length varies by version. |
| |
07-24-08, 02:52 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | 1.20.13
Join Date: Sep 2007 Last Online: Today 11:14 AM Location: Chill this is only the internet.
Posts: 12,934
Thanks: 1,000
Thanked 1,709 Times in 1,244 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative Gender:  Awards:
Current Mood: | Re: A question for Gun knowledgable people. ahh democracy now.
anyway. its all conjecture and speculationin an attempt to smear KBR over this poor girls death.
Shameful on DN part.
But lets stick to the facts.
The father is wrong about "blowing the face off" |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | |