• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

A Big Butt Is A Healthy Butt: Women With Big Butts Are Smarter And Healthier

As we all know from Batbershop, there's a difference between a big ass woman and a woman with a big ass.
 
radcen said:
All I can say is... Amen! :mrgreen:
Click to expand...

love-the-booty.jpg


Hmmm...

Yeah. Okay. That was creepy as ****. I apologize.

(Not really)

:lol:
 
Rofl

I live in Arkansas - trust me . . . it's not true at all. Where are these women living? Definitely not around here. I'm not even saying it to be mean, but with one of the highest obesity rates of all the states in the US and some of the lowest national test scores, this state is filled with a bunch of dumb fat bitches. (yeah - I said it).
 
Big bottom, big bottom
Talk about mudflaps, my girl's got 'em
Big bottom, drive me out of my mind
How could I leave this behind?






lol luv that movie.
 
Beaudreaux said:
I have to disagree. Not that it's the opposite either, but it dang sure doesn't indicate intelligence - Kardashian's are the proof.
Click to expand...
:lol: Point taken, and I cannot disagree.

I still like big butt's, though. ;)

And while I do not give Kim Kardashian credit for anything else, I do think she is physically attractive.
 
Aunt Spiker said:
Rofl

I live in Arkansas - trust me . . . it's not true at all. Where are these women living? Definitely not around here. I'm not even saying it to be mean, but with one of the highest obesity rates of all the states in the US and some of the lowest national test scores, this state is filled with a bunch of dumb fat bitches. (yeah - I said it).
Click to expand...

I believe the guys are talking about ladies with small waists. The "fat admirer" phenomenon is a very different fetish.
 
And yet every centenarian I've ever seen, ever known, has been a skinny Minnie (and I've seen quite a few of them). Never seen anyone with a fat anything make it into that club.
 
radcen said:
All I can say is... Amen! :mrgreen:
Click to expand...

I think they got it a little bit wrong. What the article seems to be saying is....women who are pear shaped, instead of apple shaped, are less likely to get diabetes and heart trouble, as well as have other trouble. The article just phrases it to be titillating, instead of entitling it " Men and Woman who gain weight in places other than their torso Are Healthier." Old news.

In my personal observation, poor, unintelligent women are more likely to have larger derrieres and big thighs. Highly intelligent, educated and/or successful women are normal shaped or thin, with only some being disproportionate.

Same thing with men. The sloppy bods, even widespread hips and flabby butts, usually go with vegetables who aren't bookworms. But they would be healthier, maybe, if they don't have beer guts.
 
This thread lacks visual depiction of its argument.
 
Beaudreaux said:
I have to disagree. Not that it's the opposite either, but it dang sure doesn't indicate intelligence - Kardashian's are the proof.
Click to expand...

to be fair they owe their butts to implants. The young one who models has a very small (pert) butt.

I think big butts are gross and a few IQ points are a good tradeoff for a small pert butt.
 
Beaudreaux said:
I have to disagree. Not that it's the opposite either, but it dang sure doesn't indicate intelligence - Kardashian's are the proof.
Click to expand...
They aren't intelligent? See how much money they have earned by selling their privacy
 
Don't confuse intelligence with shrewd venality. ;)
 
radcen said:
All I can say is... Amen! :mrgreen:
Click to expand...

I avoid any topic involving butt size around women altogether, it is always a trick question. If you say they have a big butt, they accuse you of calling them fat, if you they they don't have a big one, it turns into oh I see not good enough for you, why don't you fantisize about those those big booty women while you don't get laid tonight.


In the end whether asked or the topic comes up, I just change the topic or run, do not care what a study says, its very mention is a trap.
 
JumpinJack said:
I think they got it a little bit wrong. What the article seems to be saying is....women who are pear shaped, instead of apple shaped, are less likely to get diabetes and heart trouble, as well as have other trouble. The article just phrases it to be titillating, instead of entitling it " Men and Woman who gain weight in places other than their torso Are Healthier." Old news.

In my personal observation, poor, unintelligent women are more likely to have larger derrieres and big thighs. Highly intelligent, educated and/or successful women are normal shaped or thin, with only some being disproportionate.

Same thing with men. The sloppy bods, even widespread hips and flabby butts, usually go with vegetables who aren't bookworms. But they would be healthier, maybe, if they don't have beer guts.
Click to expand...
If you insist on being serious...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom