• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Wasn't there a third person arrested

MaggieD

MaggieD

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 9, 2010
Messages
43,244
Reaction score
44,664
Location
Chicago Area
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Moderate
...when the scene was still active? I could swear I heard that . . . But have heard nothing since.

Anyone know?
 
MaggieD said:
...when the scene was still active? I could swear I heard that . . . But have heard nothing since.

Anyone know?
Click to expand...

They apprehended a guy, but I haven't heard anything else about it.
 
ditto. Not a peep.
 
MaggieD said:
...when the scene was still active? I could swear I heard that . . . But have heard nothing since.

Anyone know?
Click to expand...

That went silent quickly.

A Ms. Sally McGee called in the 911 emergency and was the first one, and SHE SAID she saw 3 people dressed in black and hooded.
 
That was only reported in the first few minutes, after that nothing was said.
 
azgreg said:
They apprehended a guy, but I haven't heard anything else about it.
Click to expand...

Goshin said:
ditto. Not a peep.
Click to expand...

Riveroaks said:
That went silent quickly.

A Ms. Sally McGee called in the 911 emergency and was the first one, and SHE SAID she saw 3 people dressed in black and hooded.
Click to expand...

Thanks. At least I know Tom and I didn't make it up. Funny the press identity ask about it at press conferences. I'm wondering if Homeland Security doesn't have him under suspended civil rights...
 
MaggieD said:
Thanks. At least I know Tom and I didn't make it up. Funny the press identity ask about it at press conferences. I'm wondering if Homeland Security doesn't have him under suspended civil rights...
Click to expand...

He is probably being waterboarded as we speak.

:D
 
MaggieD said:
Thanks. At least I know Tom and I didn't make it up. Funny the press identity ask about it at press conferences. I'm wondering if Homeland Security doesn't have him under suspended civil rights...
Click to expand...

Possibly so
 
I guess it could have been some whacky love triangle thing.
 
MaggieD said:
Thanks. At least I know Tom and I didn't make it up. Funny the press identity ask about it at press conferences. I'm wondering if Homeland Security doesn't have him under suspended civil rights...
Click to expand...

They have at least two people in custody - the third person you were asking about, and the guy that bought the guns that were used in the shooting (which was announced/confirmed today by the ATF - FBI said that the gun buying guy was not under arrest at this time). One of the reasons they don't put these guys under arrest, is they do not have to read them their Miranda rights until they do. As long as they are being detained and in custody, but not under arrest, the FBI and ATF don't have to worry about a lawyer getting in their way of questioning the guys. Of course, nothing they say to the FBI or ATF prior to the Miranda warning can be used in court against them. It can be a good time for the cops to get info on other people involved.
 
Last edited:
MaggieD said:
...when the scene was still active? I could swear I heard that . . . But have heard nothing since.

Anyone know?
Click to expand...

The police detained a third suspect who was seen fleeing the scene of the shootout. Since then, the police have unequivocally stated that there were only two shooters though they may have had help from others (they don't know). My guess is that this third person taken into custody was some guy running away from a **** storm though it could be someone who was involved and the police are playing it close to the vest
 
The mother in law with the baby is conspicuously missing and out of communication.

That was a news flash today on CBSN.
 
sangha said:
The police detained a third suspect who was seen fleeing the scene of the shootout. Since then, the police have unequivocally stated that there were only two shooters though they may have had help from others (they don't know). My guess is that this third person taken into custody was some guy running away from a **** storm though it could be someone who was involved and the police are playing it close to the vest
Click to expand...

It may have been a burglar caught up at a bad time and place or it could have been anyone with a fear of the police -- remember that a lot of natives run when they see cops.

It could have been an illegal alien -- California is loaded. They always run even if nobody is after them.
 
Riveroaks said:
The mother in law with the baby is conspicuously missing and out of communication.

That was a news flash today on CBSN.
Click to expand...
I saw that too where the police busted out the side window of the mother in law's car to look inside it. Maybe she is just trying to avoid the media.

There are so many unanswered questions here. No one has said yet what the argument was at the Christmas party that caused him to leave in anger.

For the life of me I can not understand how a mother and father can just leave their 6 month old baby like that. It means that we may be approaching some point where someone puts a suicide bomb in his or her's baby's diaper.

I hope the FBI is able to recoup information from the damaged cell phones and computer.
 
Crosscheck said:
I saw that too where the police busted out the side window of the mother in law's car to look inside it. Maybe she is just trying to avoid the media.

There are so many unanswered questions here. No one has said yet what the argument was at the Christmas party that caused him to leave in anger.

For the life of me I can not understand how a mother and father can just leave their 6 month old baby like that. It means that we may be approaching some point where someone puts a suicide bomb in his or her's baby's diaper.

I hope the FBI is able to recoup information from the damaged cell phones and computer.
Click to expand...

Yea, i have a hard time understanding the kid, they had to have known. Crazed fanatics, drugged out? Suicidal ? I guess its supposed to be difficult to understand crazy people.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom