• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Greetings from Russia

Question: Why did Kruschev give the Crimea to the Ukraines?

Question: Why did communism fail? With the fall of communism so did the Russian empire. And it seems Putin wants to reestablish the Russian empire. To do this, if a Russian living in Estonia or Latvia complains of "ill treatment" Putin will find an excuse to add those countries to the empire. There are Russians living in China. So if a Russian complains to Putin will that be enough reason for him to try to grab some Chinese territory?

Question: Russia attempted to annex Afghanistan but failed. What has Russia learned?


How much I've learned about the history of Russia :)

Nikita Khrushchev gave Crimea to Ukraine. Soviet Union - it was one country, consisting of republics. Crimea Khrushchev was transferred to the management, it was not a transfer of territory. Crimea could manage it more effectively with the southern part of Ukraine, not from the south of Russia. Simple optimization of the administrative apparatus.

In my opinion the collapse of the Soviet Union contributed to several factors: the economy, corruption, betrayal of the highest ranks. If you know how we do not like Gorbachev ...

Nobody strive to recreate the Russian empire. It does not make sense. Baltic also useless. To "protect" the Russian-speaking population has a program of resettlement of compatriots. This is enough.

Russia and China has no territorial disputes. All disputes decided a few years ago and everyone is happy. With China we have a very good relationship at the moment.

Russia tried to annex Afghanistan? You sure about that? :) The military operation in Afghanistan was aimed at maintaining power in this country. The Soviet Union it was not possible for certain reasons.
 
Hi I did not read the whole thread, So you may have had this question before.

How do Russians feel about all the Putin bashing going on in the West. My personal opinion is he is not as bad as the American press makes him out to be.

Also who do you think shot that plain down over Ukraine. I have to say your English is very good.
 
Hi I did not read the whole thread, So you may have had this question before.

How do Russians feel about all the Putin bashing going on in the West. My personal opinion is he is not as bad as the American press makes him out to be.

Also who do you think shot that plain down over Ukraine. I have to say your English is very good.


Thank you for your questions!

In Russia, there are certain negative effects of sanctions and conflict in Ukraine. But there is a certain policy on all of this. For example, ceasing to receive equipment from Europe, we have begun to allocate funds to establish their own. Not all Soviet industry is dead, there is hurt.

This also applies to agriculture. Russia has recently become a member of the World Trade Organization, which imposes restrictions on the support of their own farmers. However, due to the sanctions, restrictions on the agricultural sector no longer apply.

By the nature of its activities, working with investors and there is an interesting situation. Officially investment companies in the US and Europe now do not work with Russia, but their Chinese units actively invest and participate in a fairly large projects.

No food riots, apples from Poland sellers replaced the apples from Serbia, the Spanish sausage has risen, but it and so bought, not all :)

For clarity ... Price products in the supermarket near my house: Слата - интернет магазин
 
Thank you for your questions!

In Russia, there are certain negative effects of sanctions and conflict in Ukraine. But there is a certain policy on all of this. For example, ceasing to receive equipment from Europe, we have begun to allocate funds to establish their own. Not all Soviet industry is dead, there is hurt.

This also applies to agriculture. Russia has recently become a member of the World Trade Organization, which imposes restrictions on the support of their own farmers. However, due to the sanctions, restrictions on the agricultural sector no longer apply.

By the nature of its activities, working with investors and there is an interesting situation. Officially investment companies in the US and Europe now do not work with Russia, but their Chinese units actively invest and participate in a fairly large projects.

No food riots, apples from Poland sellers replaced the apples from Serbia, the Spanish sausage has risen, but it and so bought, not all :)

For clarity ... Price products in the supermarket near my house: Слата - интернет магазин

Not really the answers to the questions I asked. But that's OK interesting none the less, are you not allowed to talk about certain things?

Anyway do you like American Hockey, NHL, if so who's your favorite team/player?

Also interested in the World War 2 battle of Stalingrad, if you know anything about that? You don't have to go into great detail. Just maybe some stuff that Americans wouldn't know about. I just watched a documentary on the battle. I found the part about the snipers very interesting, & how both men & women were do the sniping. Is Vasily Zaytsev still a big deal in Russia.

Thanks
 
Not really the answers to the questions I asked. But that's OK interesting none the less, are you not allowed to talk about certain things?

Anyway do you like American Hockey, NHL, if so who's your favorite team/player?

Also interested in the World War 2 battle of Stalingrad, if you know anything about that? You don't have to go into great detail. Just maybe some stuff that Americans wouldn't know about. I just watched a documentary on the battle. I found the part about the snipers very interesting, & how both men & women were do the sniping. Is Vasily Zaytsev still a big deal in Russia.

Thanks

Maybe I do not fully understand your question. Shall describe the details and I will answer :)

I do not really watch the hockey, especially in the NHL. Look only game of the Russian national team and then not always. More watch the biathlon and F1.

Quite a long time and in detail studied the history of the Great Patriotic War and World War II. There is talk that from my point of view, but it ubdet long :)

If we talk about the battle of Stalingrad, the first thing she was a turning point for all participants. The Soviets had a significant advantage on the southern boundary, and thanks to parallel operation conducted "Saturn" in fact deprived the German army offensive potential.

An interesting point, I think the fact that the German side until recently denied an impending disaster and believed that they would be able to capture Stalingrad. Paulus is characterized in our history as a man with a weak character, who waited until the end of salvation.

If you are interested in information about the Soviet snipers during the Second World War, you can see the details here: Советские снайперы Второй мировой войны 1939 - 1945 гг. Russian Snipers of 1939 - 1945 years unfortunately, the information only in Russian.
 
Maybe I do not fully understand your question. Shall describe the details and I will answer :)

I do not really watch the hockey, especially in the NHL. Look only game of the Russian national team and then not always. More watch the biathlon and F1.

Quite a long time and in detail studied the history of the Great Patriotic War and World War II. There is talk that from my point of view, but it ubdet long :)

If we talk about the battle of Stalingrad, the first thing she was a turning point for all participants. The Soviets had a significant advantage on the southern boundary, and thanks to parallel operation conducted "Saturn" in fact deprived the German army offensive potential.

An interesting point, I think the fact that the German side until recently denied an impending disaster and believed that they would be able to capture Stalingrad. Paulus is characterized in our history as a man with a weak character, who waited until the end of salvation.

If you are interested in information about the Soviet snipers during the Second World War, you can see the details here: Совет�кие �найперы Второй мировой войны 1939 - 1945 гг. Russian Snipers of 1939 - 1945 years unfortunately, the information only in Russian.

Agree Paulus waited to long. He could have saved some lives if he could have thought for himself.

Russia couldn't lose Stalingrad, & it was the turning point of the war. The world owes a lot to Russia & the 27 million lost souls in WW2. Thank You.

If you get a chance to watch Oliver Stones, Untold History of the United States, he points out just how important Russia was.

Sorry I don't read Russian. But thank You anyway. Talk to you soon.
 
See Victory Parade with us!

 
Freshen up the theme, while there is time ...

The news comes a month ago, but finally confirmed only recently. Russia resumes production of the most beautiful airplane :)

In addition to beauty, it is also a unique bomber. Specifications are really impressive, despite the age of the aircraft.

Tu-160 (Blackjack) White swan - a supersonic strategic bomber-rocket carrier with a wing with variable geometry, designed to Tupolev in 1970-1980. The most powerful and heaviest combat aircraft in the world.

Technical characteristics
Crew: 4 people
Length: 54.1 m
Wingspan: 55.7 / 50.7 / 35.6 m
Height: 13.1 m
Wing area: 232 m²
Empty weight: 110,000 kg
Normal takeoff weight: 267,600 kg
Maximum takeoff weight: 275,000 kg
Engines: 4 × turbofans NK-32
Link maximum: 4 × 18 000 kgf
Thrust in afterburner 4 × 25 000 kg
Weight Fuel 148 000 kg

Flight characteristics

Speed ​​limit on the height: 2230 km / h (M = 1.87)
Cruising speed: 917 km / h (M = 0.77)
The maximum range without refueling 13 950 km
Practical range without refueling 12 300 km
Combat radius: 6000 km
Flight duration: 25 hours
Service ceiling: 21,000 m
Rate of climb: 4400 m / min
Takeoff run / runs: 900/2000 m
Wing loading:
with a maximum takeoff weight of 1185 kg / m
at normal takeoff weight of 1150 kg / m
Thrust-to-weight ratio:
with a maximum take-off weight: 0.37
during normal take-off weight: 0.36

The fate of this aircraft quite tragic. Total production during the 35 aircraft were produced. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia remains 16 units, 19 units of Ukraine. In 1998, Ukraine has started to utilize these aircraft, in what she actively assisted by representatives of the United States under the Nunn - Lugar. The first Ukrainian aircraft was destroyed by 16 November 1998 in the presence of US senators Richard Lugar and Carl Levin.

I remember friends took the news pilots who thought TU-160 a perfect plane. I saw crying pilots and cursed while. It was painful to watch. For every destroyed the aircraft Ukrainians have received $ 1 million. It was a sad sight.

However, Russia was able to return 8 aircraft. This was due to repayment of debts for gas.

To date, Russia has 16 Tu-160M. All planes have been completely modernized and received new weapons.

Now the Tu-160 missiles equipped with the X-555 and X-101. Launch X-555 has a nuclear charge, and X-101 has a conventional or nuclear warhead. At full capacity TU-160 carries 12 missiles in two reels (the drums jokingly called "Soviet revolver").

Now, the news itself - the Ministry of Defense of Russia in the near future will buy at least 50 new Tu-160.

This news came as a boon for fans of combat aircraft. And it is not casual. By most accounts, the TU-160 is the most beautiful Russian aircraft. And we do not touch upon the discussion of the technical characteristics in comparison with other planes :)

Today, Tu-160 performed combat patrols of the Arctic zone and are on constant alert.

We have this beautiful love in Siberia, while other machines produce no less beautiful and functional;)
1328645903_b6ax40.jpg
 
Today in Russia held "One day of the election." Elected heads of regions, mayors and some deputies. I would like to say about the choice of no choice by the example of our region.

We choose only the city governor. Running for four people. Two favorites.

The first - the former governor, who was appointed by Putin. In the spring of this year, our governor resigned and decided to run for election. The fact is that until recently, some regions received the governor of Putin's decree. It had a practical sense and can be a long time to argue about this, but in the end everything is back to direct elections of governors. This man, who in power for three years, tendered his resignation. At the same time he was appointed acting governor. In addition, he is running for the elections. It turns out that with the victory in the elections (but it was he who wins by a wide margin), he will be elected governor for five years. By itself, it is the local oligarchy. Until recently, he was the owner of the airline, the large industrial enterprises. Everyone knows how it achieves this, and by what means. Now it is not discussed, but here there is an obvious crime.

The second candidate - professional politician, communist. Throughout his life, this man is a deputy and is selected only in the "middle". He has no experience anywhere except in politics. Throughout his career the man professionally promises to make life better voters. If elected. But vote for him only the Communists and part of the protest electorate.

Two other candidates ... But almost no one simply does not know. Campaigning is not carried out, a voter is not found ...

In Russia, many inverted positions. Good are the villains and freaks, evil and protect the saints and martyrs. These elections will not be fraud and any scandals. People choose the lesser evil. We just bored and this many problems.

Want to know about the elections in Russia more? There is a wonderful film that in comedy form reflects the realities of the elections in Russia - "Election Day."

You can download it here, for example: http://rutor.org/torrent/419677/den-vyborov-2007-satrip-avc-polnaja-televersija

English subtitles: Subtitles » ???????? - Den vyborov - English subtitles for russian movies

url.jpg
 
Can civilians legally own firearms there?
 
Can civilians legally own firearms there?

Hello! Sorry for the long answer. For a long time did not look here

Russia has a complicated relationship with guns.

Citizens can hold three types of firearms: hunting weapons, traumatic weapons, gas weapons.

Hunting weapons - shotguns and rifles threaded. For hunting weapons required to undergo a medical examination, which includes a visit to a psychiatrist. You also need to pass the exam on the rules for handling such weapons. Together, the deadline for receipt of the license to possess such a weapon is two months. After the purchase of weapons can only be used for the protection of his home, in the territory of their home. To hunt with this weapon must also get a "hunting license". Only a hunting permit may carry a weapon.

For rifled hunting weapons (rifles) will take five years to own shotguns. Rules for obtaining the same, including the availability of hunting permit. Every five years, the license is obtained from the re-exams. Weapons considers hunting, if the store no more than ten rounds. Automatic weapons are prohibited. The weapons used by the military patron - is prohibited. Weapons without stock - is prohibited.

Traumatic weapons - is short arms (gun), which uses a rubber bullet. Rules for obtaining the same, as well as for hunting weapons, but without hunting permit. Power of the cartridge in such weapons may not exceed 90 joules.

Gas weapons - short arms, which uses the gas cartridge. Ownership rules are the same as in the traumatic weapons.

Any firearm in Russia must be kept in a special safe, which is checked by the police before issuing a license. When transporting weapons must be unloaded. Banned the transport and storage of more than 400 rounds of ammunition for weapons.

Without a license in Russia bought: bows and crossbows, gas cartridges (limited composition), stun (limited power source). It is forbidden to carry truncheons and brass knuckles and knives hilt longer than 14 centimeters.
 
Russia Is Sobering Up From Its Drunken 1990s America-Worship

Yet sadly American politicians' uninformed groupthink about Russia has not changed much at all

mac.jpg


Bygone are the days when Russians idolized everything western
The US-inspired economic reforms cost Russia half of her industrial production
Self-confident Russia could be a better partner to America than a subservient one

The author is popular blogger fritzmorgen. This is a Russia Insider exclusive.

I lived in Leningrad when the heavily rusted Iron Curtain collapsed and Russians could see the Western world. We imagined the West to be a communist paradise where everyone, including those idles who lived on welfare, could afford jeans, video-recorders and cars.

The winter of 1991 came with two memorable events. Firstly, Freddie Mercury had died (people in USSR loved his songs just like any other people). Secondly, our class went to Denmark on a student-exchange trip.

The trip was a real shock to teenagers from crisis-stricken USSR, where shopping for basic foodstuffs entailed grueling queues.

Soviet authorities regarded the art of advertising with contempt, so everything enraptured us, from sweet soda to colorful advertising leaflets printed on glossy paper. We probably looked like savages staring at bright beads at an imitation jewelry store. We were stunned and delighted by capitalistic reality.

In the same year, Leningrad was renamed Saint-Petersburg, the Soviet Union passed away, and we with our hearts ablaze embarked on building capitalism, the showcase of which had seemed so alluring to us. We expected, in all seriousness, that we would all become rich people.

As befits diligent cargo-cult neophytes, we drew an airstrip on a beach as accurately as we could, and a few savages from our tribe started swinging torches in an attempt to imitate runway lights. But somehow a huge silvery bird didn't come to give us valuable cargo.

After the first seven years of democratic reforms in Russia, the Industrial Production Index fell by more than 50%, and agriculture was in such disarray that it was hard to find any Russian merchandise. To be honest, nobody was even looking for Russian products, as during that time we believed that real quality was only to be found in the West.


In 1998 Russia defaulted because of the reckless speculation with government bonds of our politicians and their oligarch companions. We became seriously dependent on IMF loans and our Western partners felt free to exploit this dependence for their own benefit.

Recently Michael Bohm, an American journalist, took part in a popular TV show in Russia. He started to explain that there is nothing wrong with having foreign citizens occupying high positions in the Ukrainian government. “Are there foreigners in the US government?” the anchorman asked. “But we are not Ukraine!” the journalist explained.

Michael Bohm's double standards are forgivable. It doesn't make sense to compare the US and Ukraine. However, the problem is that Washington treats Russia in the same dismissive manner.

In the 1990s, Washington's condescension was justified. Russia was a poor and thoroughly corrupt country. The average pension was 30 dollars a month, while public officials faithfully obeyed their American advisors. At the time, Russia looked like a wretched drunken cowboy from a Hollywood film.

I'm not proud of that period of our history. Nevertheless, 17 years have passed since the default of 1998. The Russian cowboy got himself together. He sobered up, bought his weapon back from the pawnshop and is now back in the saddle, just like in the good old Soviet days – a period which a lot of Russian people reminisce about with unconcealed nostalgia (which, I suppose, is not altogether unreasonable).

In the year 2000 Vladimir Putin took power from Boris Yeltsin's weakening hands. Putin removed thieving oligarchs from power, forced businessmen to pay taxes, and rebuilt industry that was nearly destroyed in the 1990s. He put the country back in order. For Russians, it was a welcome sight.

I live in Saint Petersburg, near the Finnish border. In 1991, a Soviet teenager believed Finland to be a wonderland full of luxury, treasure and the glittering light of neon signs. When I went on a trip to Finland in 2014, I was looking around and couldn't understand: how could I have admired these backwoods twenty years ago?

Russia Is Sobering Up From Its Drunken 1990s America-Worship
 
ending

Sadly, in terms of perception, American politicians are stuck in the 1990s. Barack Obama was deeply mistaken when he bragged that he had left the Russian economy “in tatters”. The blow that Washington dealt to Russia when it blocked Russian access to dollar loans can be likened to a cowboy who has been barred from buying whiskey on credit in a saloon. The drunkard of 1998 would probably have died without cheap whiskey. In 2015, the cowboy can easily enjoy some Chinese tea for a change.

I suppose Uncle Sam should reconsider his merry band of sovietologists and self-styled experts, and then proceed to analyze the situation in Russia not by reading his own tame activists' reports but by reading articles in the Western business media, which are at least more objective. Now, after Vladimir Putin helped Barack Obama solve the Iran problem, is the best time to move towards a de-escalation in the US relationship with Russia, especially given that the Russians may still believe there is a chance for a mutually beneficial relationship between the two countries.
 
Back
Top Bottom