• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Possible new raquettball variant. Help please.

maquiscat

Maquis Admiral
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 9, 2011
Messages
19,986
Reaction score
7,365
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
So a little background. I'm going back to college and one of the classes I'm required to take is a fitness class (a required class no matter what degree you are going for). So the good news is that they have a racquetball court where I can do my "get the heart rate in the target zone" thing 3 times a week. The bad news is that I really can't find someone whose schedule matches mine. So I've been forced to play pretty much solo.

So my brain, being such as it is, starts developing ideas on how to make a competition out of even solo play. So I thought that I would put what I have so far and see if this is a feasible idea and/or get some help in refining the rules. Note, the rules below assume that you have a basic understanding of the rules of Racquetball.

So we start with a standard racquetball court, one that is also drawn up for Wallyball (I think that's the proper name for the volleyball game held inside a racquetball court). Those lines now help lay out three zones. From the front most serving line to the front wall is Zone 1. From the dashed wallyball line to the back wall is Zone 3 and the area between them is Zone 2. The 1 and 3 may be reversed depending upon the rules refinement and you'll see what their significance is in a little bit. However, for now we will assume 1 to 3, front to back.

A single round will last a given time frame. I haven't fully determined what would be a good limit. I'm ranging anywhere from 5 minutes to 20 minutes, but probably some multiple of 5.

Player starts his round with a standard serve but from Zone 3. After than any normally legal racquetball play is allowed. Player continues until a foul occurs (hits floor twice, etc). Player starts again, however, (and scoring is coming up below) there is a time penalty, in the form of a no scoring period before he can start scoring. I'm thinking either 5 or 10 seconds, no more than 15, depending on how long the round is.

Scoring has multiple parts and this is the part that makes it difficult to play and score yourself alone. First off a player receives 1 point for every second they keep the ball in legal play. The time starts from when the ball hits the racquet (unless during the penalty period) and ends when the ball touches the floor a second time in a volley or some other event that would normally cause a new serve to occur. Two possible variations are whether or not to include the 1/10th of seconds, and let them accumulate over the course of the round. Such will make a difference in the final score. Additional points are received from each time the ball strikes a surface other than the front wall or the floor; 1 point per strike. The player or his racquet does not count as a surface for you smartasses. :D A possible variation is to allow the front wall and/or the floor. Finally the zones are multipliers. Any score received in zone 2 is doubled and any in zone 3 is tripled. The two variations I've come up with here is what determines when the multiplier is applied. Variation one is based upon where the players is. Variations two is a straight physical zone and can only apply to the surface strikes. I guess that the player's position can determine what multiplier is applied to the time score and the physical zones for the surface strikes.

Most of these rules are designed to discourage the player from simply bopping the ball back and forth at a short distance with the front wall, thus inducing more potentially random movements into the ball.

So thoughts, ideas, suggestions?
 
:rofl at myself. I thought this would be a "punny" thread about politics.......

I don't play rb so I can't opine.

Have a great day

Thom Paine
 
:rofl at myself. I thought this would be a "punny" thread about politics.......

I don't play rb so I can't opine.

Have a great day

Thom Paine

Well I would have put it in the loft but I don't have access. 5 kids tend to do that to you. So off-topic was the best I could come up with. Maybe sports in LA, but I went as general as I could. Thanks anyway.
 
So a little background. I'm going back to college and one of the classes I'm required to take is a fitness class (a required class no matter what degree you are going for). So the good news is that they have a racquetball court where I can do my "get the heart rate in the target zone" thing 3 times a week. The bad news is that I really can't find someone whose schedule matches mine. So I've been forced to play pretty much solo.

So my brain, being such as it is, starts developing ideas on how to make a competition out of even solo play. So I thought that I would put what I have so far and see if this is a feasible idea and/or get some help in refining the rules. Note, the rules below assume that you have a basic understanding of the rules of Racquetball.

So we start with a standard racquetball court, one that is also drawn up for Wallyball (I think that's the proper name for the volleyball game held inside a racquetball court). Those lines now help lay out three zones. From the front most serving line to the front wall is Zone 1. From the dashed wallyball line to the back wall is Zone 3 and the area between them is Zone 2. The 1 and 3 may be reversed depending upon the rules refinement and you'll see what their significance is in a little bit. However, for now we will assume 1 to 3, front to back.

A single round will last a given time frame. I haven't fully determined what would be a good limit. I'm ranging anywhere from 5 minutes to 20 minutes, but probably some multiple of 5.

Player starts his round with a standard serve but from Zone 3. After than any normally legal racquetball play is allowed. Player continues until a foul occurs (hits floor twice, etc). Player starts again, however, (and scoring is coming up below) there is a time penalty, in the form of a no scoring period before he can start scoring. I'm thinking either 5 or 10 seconds, no more than 15, depending on how long the round is.

Scoring has multiple parts and this is the part that makes it difficult to play and score yourself alone. First off a player receives 1 point for every second they keep the ball in legal play. The time starts from when the ball hits the racquet (unless during the penalty period) and ends when the ball touches the floor a second time in a volley or some other event that would normally cause a new serve to occur. Two possible variations are whether or not to include the 1/10th of seconds, and let them accumulate over the course of the round. Such will make a difference in the final score. Additional points are received from each time the ball strikes a surface other than the front wall or the floor; 1 point per strike. The player or his racquet does not count as a surface for you smartasses. :D A possible variation is to allow the front wall and/or the floor. Finally the zones are multipliers. Any score received in zone 2 is doubled and any in zone 3 is tripled. The two variations I've come up with here is what determines when the multiplier is applied. Variation one is based upon where the players is. Variations two is a straight physical zone and can only apply to the surface strikes. I guess that the player's position can determine what multiplier is applied to the time score and the physical zones for the surface strikes.

Most of these rules are designed to discourage the player from simply bopping the ball back and forth at a short distance with the front wall, thus inducing more potentially random movements into the ball.

So thoughts, ideas, suggestions?

Dude, skate - as in rollerblade, then play some hockey...

Handball is for little kids...
 
Dude, skate - as in rollerblade, then play some hockey...

Handball is for little kids...

Yeah I'd like to see you keep up with some of the "little kids" I see playing on the "A" list. Me I know I'm down somewhere on the "H" list. Constructive criticism please.
 
Yeah I'd like to see you keep up with some of the "little kids" I see playing on the "A" list. Me I know I'm down somewhere on the "H" list. Constructive criticism please.

Dude, I played semi-pro hockey.

I think I can handle smacking a ball with my hand...
 
Dude, I played semi-pro hockey.

I think I can handle smacking a ball with my hand...

First comprehension fail. Racquetball uses a racquet, hence the name racquetball. As opposed to handball where one uses their hand. Hence the name handball.

Second your hockey skill don't mean jack in the court as the game requires a completely different set of skills. These "little kids" would hand you your hand, racquet and arse were you to step into the court with them. Hell I just play casually and I would probably whip you as bad as you would whip me on the hockey field/rink.

Now is there some particular reason that you are being a douche and trolling this thread?
 
Just a last ditch bump to see if I can get any aid, otherwise, I'll just drop it.
 
First comprehension fail. Racquetball uses a racquet, hence the name racquetball. As opposed to handball where one uses their hand. Hence the name handball.

Second your hockey skill don't mean jack in the court as the game requires a completely different set of skills. These "little kids" would hand you your hand, racquet and arse were you to step into the court with them. Hell I just play casually and I would probably whip you as bad as you would whip me on the hockey field/rink.

Now is there some particular reason that you are being a douche and trolling this thread?

Good give me a racquet and I will destroy you considering the racquet is far bigger than my hand..... Btw I was a pretty good tennis player back in the day to boot so I understand the strategy....
 
Back
Top Bottom