• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If you had the money, would you buy a 3.9 million dollar Lamborghini Veneno?

If you had the money, would you buy a 3.9 million dollar Lamborghini Veneno?

  • Total voters
    36
Luna Tick said:
This is a super fancy sports car that goes 0 to 60 in 3 seconds (can anyone say whiplash?). I wouldn't buy one even if I had the money, but I'm curious as to how many would. I'd bet my Saturn gets better gas mileage.

The 8 Most Ridiculously Expensive Cars At The Geneva Motor Show
Click to expand...

Well, I'd have to have alot of money, but yes, I would.

The fact is, without the rich buying these rare and really expensive cars, you wouldn't have much of the technology that you take for granted today.

Somebody has got to fund the research and design work, and the car you drive from the defunct Saturn company sure isn't going to do it.
 
Luna Tick said:
This is a super fancy sports car that goes 0 to 60 in 3 seconds (can anyone say whiplash?). I wouldn't buy one even if I had the money, but I'm curious as to how many would. I'd bet my Saturn gets better gas mileage.

The 8 Most Ridiculously Expensive Cars At The Geneva Motor Show
Click to expand...

LOL - hell no . . . That's a total waste of money. I like cool cars but I like doing more intelligent things with my money even more. I'd buy a better house, a solid vehicle - put the kids through college - see to my aunt's house and pay off all her debts . . . and so on.

I'd take care of everyone - donate some to the children's hospital so they can improve parking/roads. . . and so on.
 
If I had so much that it didn't matter much, absolutely. I live in Germany so I'd actually get to test its top speed!

VROOM VROOM!

Luna Tick said:
This is a super fancy sports car that goes 0 to 60 in 3 seconds (can anyone say whiplash?). I wouldn't buy one even if I had the money, but I'm curious as to how many would. I'd bet my Saturn gets better gas mileage.

The 8 Most Ridiculously Expensive Cars At The Geneva Motor Show
Click to expand...

If you can afford one of these, I can't imagine you'd give a flying rats ass about the gas mileage.
 
ocean515 said:
Well, I'd have to have alot of money, but yes, I would.

The fact is, without the rich buying these rare and really expensive cars, you wouldn't have much of the technology that you take for granted today.

Somebody has got to fund the research and design work, and the car you drive from the defunct Saturn company sure isn't going to do it.
Click to expand...

Valid points all but I wouldn't want a vehicle like that for fear i'd break it!

I could be persuaded to take a F150 Raptor ? The one that will go over or thru anything!!:)
 
I'd be tempted, but probably would buy another super-car, not that big of a Lambo fan.
 
penn1954 said:
Valid points all but I wouldn't want a vehicle like that for fear i'd break it!

I could be persuaded to take a F150 Raptor ? The one that will go over or thru anything!!:)
Click to expand...

Hmmm.

How about using the Raptor to tow back the broken Lambo? I know, get Lambo to throw in a Raptor so you can haul your luggage and other goodies?
 
ocean515 said:
Hmmm.

How about using the Raptor to tow back the broken Lambo? I know, get Lambo to throw in a Raptor so you can haul your luggage and other goodies?
Click to expand...

I like your thinking!

Now all I need is the 3.9 million!!:2razz:
 
buy a regular car and you have plenty of left overs to play with katt williams says it best

That mean I got to buy four or five other games at $45 to $55 apiece.
"Now, Daddy can do this all day, every day. No problem.
"Or I can look in the newspaper under the classified section
"and I can get you what's known as a Nintendo 64
" for the same price you can get the nintendo, 2 controllers and 20 games "
 
no. I'd purchase a classic muscle car, and a cutting edge electric vehicle. in this way, I'd have more fun, and I'd save most of the 3.9 mil.
 
Lutherf said:
No.....but I might buy 10 $390,000 Lamborghini's...or just buy my dream car from high school, a 1975 Countach, and keep the change.
Click to expand...

in high school, my favorite lambo was probably the Miura from the early 1970s. it was already a classic by then. I believe Frank Sinatra had one, also.
 
Moderator's Warning:
A reminder to only post political polls in the poll section please.
 
imgres-1.jpeg
-------------------------------------------------------
 
ocean515 said:
Well, I'd have to have alot of money, but yes, I would.

The fact is, without the rich buying these rare and really expensive cars, you wouldn't have much of the technology that you take for granted today.

Somebody has got to fund the research and design work, and the car you drive from the defunct Saturn company sure isn't going to do it.
Click to expand...

Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying no one should buy that car. I'm only saying it's not for me. If I had massive funds, I would buy multiple cars. 1. A Tesla S electric car for my every day driving with no carbon footprint (if your charging source is CO2 free, which mine will be soon via solar). 2. A Prius -- a hybrid for when I need the range to drive across country. 3. A Model T for the historic value and for the fun of it 4. A Duesenberg, also for historic value and fun.

I would only drive cars 3 and 4 on occasion, so I would have very little carbon footprint, but I'd still have fun. My dad actually does own a Model T that he bought from an elderly gentleman who could no longer drive it. You have to re-learn to drive since it uses neither today's automatic transmission nor the standard 4 or 5 speed manual transmission with a clutch. There's no heat or air conditioning, and the windshield wipers have to be moved by hand. It's a primitive car, but it is really fun to drive around.

For fun cars, I tend to like really old ones, and that Duesenberg is sexy. It reminds me of film stars from the 20s and 30s.
 
No, I honestly couldn't justify spending more than $100,000 if I was a multi-millionaire or billionaire.
 
Luna Tick said:
This is a super fancy sports car that goes 0 to 60 in 3 seconds (can anyone say whiplash?). I wouldn't buy one even if I had the money, but I'm curious as to how many would. I'd bet my Saturn gets better gas mileage.

The 8 Most Ridiculously Expensive Cars At The Geneva Motor Show
Click to expand...

4 mil for an ugly piece of **** like that? Hell no. If I want a pricey fast car that turns heads, I'll get a '63 Split window coupe. Made back when cars were works of art.
 
If I had the money, I would....

Buy a yacht

Get 10 expensive hookers

Buy one metric ton of cocaine

Park that bitch in tropical waters

That is all
 
Redress said:
Moderator's Warning:
A reminder to only post political polls in the poll section please.
Click to expand...

I consider this to be a political poll because of the impact of automobiles on CO2s in the air.
 
Luna Tick said:
Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying no one should buy that car. I'm only saying it's not for me. If I had massive funds, I would buy multiple cars. 1. A Tesla S electric car for my every day driving with no carbon footprint (if your charging source is CO2 free, which mine will be soon via solar). 2. A Prius -- a hybrid for when I need the range to drive across country. 3. A Model T for the historic value and for the fun of it 4. A Duesenberg, also for historic value and fun.

I would only drive cars 3 and 4 on occasion, so I would have very little carbon footprint, but I'd still have fun. My dad actually does own a Model T that he bought from an elderly gentleman who could no longer drive it. You have to re-learn to drive since it uses neither today's automatic transmission nor the standard 4 or 5 speed manual transmission with a clutch. There's no heat or air conditioning, and the windshield wipers have to be moved by hand. It's a primitive car, but it is really fun to drive around.

For fun cars, I tend to like really old ones, and that Duesenberg is sexy. It reminds me of film stars from the 20s and 30s.
Click to expand...


Hey, if you're going to go all the way to a Duesenberg, go for something like this:

1939 Delahaye 165 Figoni et Falaschi Cabriolet

Delahaye-165-Figoni-et-Falaschi-Cabriolet.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom