"Obama only reduces the deficit beause its 10 yrs of revenue vs 6 yrs of benefits"

Re: "Obama only reduces the deficit beause its 10 yrs of revenue vs 6 yrs of benefits

Vern said:

"The Senate bill is cleverly designed to gather revenues (higher taxes, fees, and other offsets) over the full 10 year window but delays paying out the major benefits, like subsidies, until the last 6 years. So, the 2010-2019 estimate is not a full cost estimate of all provisions fully implemented and will certainly add significantly to the true cost of the bill."

ObamaCare's budget trickery | FreedomWorks

Hey, remember that lying narrative? I do. Where's the "deficit" update now that its 10 years of revenue vs 10 years of benefits? oh yea, it was a lie. And they knew it was lie but of course they knew the 'typcial' con either didn't care it was a lie couldn't figure out it was a lie. They kinda figured out after "the president was born in Kenya and his BC is fake" that they could really just say whatever they wanted and they wouldn't be held accountable.

Click to expand...

Wow you make them sound like Obama, could it be true this time?

Re: "Obama only reduces the deficit beause its 10 yrs of revenue vs 6 yrs of benefits

And CP, that the lying "realistic assumptions" narrative had nothing to do with the original lying "10 years of revenue vs 6 years of benefits" narrative. I did enjoy it though. and it was such a ridiculous narrative that even Forbes felt it necessary to rip it.

GOP Senator Knowingly Distorts GAO Report He Commissioned To Launch Most Dishonest Attack On Obamacare To Date

GOP Senator Knowingly Distorts GAO Report He Commissioned To Launch Most Dishonest Attack On Obamacare To Date - Forbes

wow, most dishonest to date? I don't know, there are so many to choose from how do you decide?

Re: "Obama only reduces the deficit beause its 10 yrs of revenue vs 6 yrs of benefits

Hicup said:

Where did they go, cpwill?


Tim-

Click to expand...

Where did CP go, Tim?

Re: "Obama only reduces the deficit beause its 10 yrs of revenue vs 6 yrs of benefits

I guess Tim couldn’t find CP. anyhoo, I guess CP finally figured out if Obamacare only reduced the deficit because it was 10 years of revenue vs 6 years of benefit, then by process of elimination, it would no longer reduce the deficit if it was

10 years of revenues vs 7 years of benefits or
10 years of revenues vs 8 years of benefits or
10 years of revenues vs 9 years of benefits or
10 years of revenues vs 10 years of benefits


But Obamacare continues to reduce the deficit. That’s exactly why the ‘conservative entertainment complex’ never “updated” the deficit projection. Its also why they came up with a replacement narrative to deflect from their original lying “budget gimmick” narrative. That would of course be the “Obamcare costs doubled” narrative that CP posted for us. It was very considerate of him. I especially want to thank CP for pointing out the worst case scenario for Obamacare is 6 trillion over 75 years. Wow, that’s like the cost of invading Iraq each decade but instead of killing hundreds of thousands of people it will save the lives of hundreds of thousands of people each decade. and there's a good chance it will continue to lower the deficit and save the lives of hundreds of thousands of people each decade.

Re: "Obama only reduces the deficit beause its 10 yrs of revenue vs 6 yrs of benefits

Mmmm, I see a lot of posts from conservatives touting "CBO says XXXX". So is the official conservative narrative " wah wah the CBO lied" officially dead?