Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 110
Like Tree31Likes

Thread: Predictions of future warfare

  1. #21
    Professor xpiher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Last Seen
    04-23-12 @ 08:33 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    1,993
    Likes Received
    473 times
    Likes Given
    154
    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Foley View Post
    This isn't a sub-forum for Ron Paul predictions.
    That had noting to do with Ron Paul you nitwit and everything to do with the rising China super power coupled with an ever shrinking supply of natural resources.

    Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
    Hayek - too liberal for republicans

  2. #22
    OWL Forever
    katiegrrl0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    at the computer
    Last Seen
    05-12-13 @ 11:18 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Socialist
    Posts
    3,807
    Likes Received
    1813 times
    Likes Given
    2140

    Re: Predictions of future warfare

    Maybe it would be good instead of predicting mayhem and violence people would do better to predict peace. It seems a tad more positive outlook. Place a flower down the barrel of a gun.
    The flame that is between us could set every soul on fire. I would love to take that heat and let's fill the whole world with desire.
    Sophie B. Hawkins

  3. #23
    Guru
    Oozlefinch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Near Baghdad by the Bay
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:01 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    3,483
    Likes Received
    1989 times
    Likes Given
    1429

    Re: Predictions of future warfare

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Foley View Post
    In future warfare this would force aircraft to have seriously heavy EMP shielding, slowing their speed, maneuverability, and bomb loads. I bet that would force aircraft into a WW1 status of being slow and cumbersome vehicles with not much armament.

    Also this EMP weapon could be aimed lower to hit vehicles, again forcing vehicles to have heavy EMP shielding...
    OMG, really?

    I hate to tell you this, but most of our military equipment is already strongly shielded against EMP. And it has been so for decades.

    You realize don't you, that most of our equipment was designed to fight the Soviets, are you not? And hardened and protected to operate in the aftermath of WWIII, a potentially nuclear war in Europe?

    And what is one of the things you have to protect against in a nuclear war? Why, EMP, naturally.

    And we have been doing research into this for decades. THISTLE, SUMMA, and lots of work into NNEMP (Non-Nuclear EMP). And as a weapon, this is all pretty much worthless.

    And EMP is one of the easiest things to build defenses against. Are you aware that pretty much all technology prior to 1950 is EMP safe? That is why many parts of the military used vacuume tubes for decades. And why most modern military equipment essentially integrate Faraday Cages into the design of their electronics placements.

    This is a nice Fantasyland piece, but the military thought of this decades ago and dismissed it.
    Major T. J. "King" Kong: Stay on the bomb run, boys! I'm gonna get them doors open if it harelips ever'body on Bear Creek!

  4. #24
    Sage
    TheDemSocialist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Kansas
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:59 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Socialist
    Posts
    12,066
    Likes Received
    5442 times
    Likes Given
    2390
    Blog Entries
    6

    Re: Predictions of future warfare

    Nuclear War
    Just a democratic-socialist in the heartland of America.
    "Life is beautiful. Let the future generations cleanse it of all evil, oppression, and violence, and enjoy it to the full."

  5. #25
    Hello World
    Proud South Korean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    South Korea
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 08:00 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    4,950
    Likes Received
    1353 times
    Likes Given
    2151

    Re: Predictions of future warfare

    Quote Originally Posted by TheDemSocialist View Post
    Nuclear War
    Which didn't happen for the past half-century, and won't happen, despite your dreams
    And he said to Saint Peter "One more soldier reporting for duty, sir. I served my time in HELL"

  6. #26
    Hello World
    Proud South Korean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    South Korea
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 08:00 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    4,950
    Likes Received
    1353 times
    Likes Given
    2151

    Re: Predictions of future warfare

    Quote Originally Posted by katiegrrl0 View Post
    Maybe it would be good instead of predicting mayhem and violence people would do better to predict peace. It seems a tad more positive outlook. Place a flower down the barrel of a gun.
    Then the person holding the gun will shoot it. destroying the flower
    And he said to Saint Peter "One more soldier reporting for duty, sir. I served my time in HELL"

  7. #27
    Hello World
    Proud South Korean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    South Korea
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 08:00 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    4,950
    Likes Received
    1353 times
    Likes Given
    2151

    Re: Predictions of future warfare

    Seems MF pretty much abandoned this thread, after beerftw's and Oozlefinch's posts
    And he said to Saint Peter "One more soldier reporting for duty, sir. I served my time in HELL"

  8. #28
    User
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Seen
    03-21-12 @ 02:15 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    40
    Likes Received
    2 times
    Likes Given
    0

    Re: Predictions of future warfare

    In future warfare this would force aircraft to have seriously heavy EMP shielding, slowing their speed, maneuverability, and bomb loads. I bet that would force aircraft into a WW1 status of being slow and cumbersome vehicles with not much armament.

    ya ya that's right!!! nice job man!!!!!!

  9. #29
    Death2Globalists Matt Foley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    ExecuteTheTraitors
    Last Seen
    11-23-12 @ 10:17 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    5,574
    Likes Received
    641 times
    Likes Given
    233

    Re: Predictions of future warfare

    Quote Originally Posted by Oozlefinch View Post
    OMG, really?

    I hate to tell you this, but most of our military equipment is already strongly shielded against EMP. And it has been so for decades.

    You realize don't you, that most of our equipment was designed to fight the Soviets, are you not? And hardened and protected to operate in the aftermath of WWIII, a potentially nuclear war in Europe?

    And what is one of the things you have to protect against in a nuclear war? Why, EMP, naturally.

    And we have been doing research into this for decades. THISTLE, SUMMA, and lots of work into NNEMP (Non-Nuclear EMP). And as a weapon, this is all pretty much worthless.

    And EMP is one of the easiest things to build defenses against. Are you aware that pretty much all technology prior to 1950 is EMP safe? That is why many parts of the military used vacuume tubes for decades. And why most modern military equipment essentially integrate Faraday Cages into the design of their electronics placements.

    This is a nice Fantasyland piece, but the military thought of this decades ago and dismissed it.
    Actually no. There might be bunkers that protect against EMP nukes, which are of limited quantity being strategic weapons themselves, but against EMP directed energy weapons nothing is protected against the EMP.

  10. #30
    Death2Globalists Matt Foley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    ExecuteTheTraitors
    Last Seen
    11-23-12 @ 10:17 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    5,574
    Likes Received
    641 times
    Likes Given
    233

    Re: Predictions of future warfare

    Quote Originally Posted by xpiher View Post
    That had noting to do with Ron Paul you nitwit and everything to do with the rising China super power coupled with an ever shrinking supply of natural resources.

    Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
    Sounded like Ronulan jibberish to me.

Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •