• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Thousands protest 'anti-immigrant' legislation in Wisconsin

I prefer just illegals. The term "undocumented immigrant" was invented by illegals and anti-Americans to hide the illegality of what the illegals are doing.

An undocumented immigrant is a person who has misplaced his documentation.

An illegal is one who never had documentation in the first place.
 
Well I am a socialist... So yes?


Is this another cheap talking point?

Is something about the protest not legal, or something?

Probably. Do those who have no right to be here have the right to protest?
 
An undocumented immigrant is a person who has misplaced his documentation.

An illegal is one who never had documentation in the first place.

Undocumented is a term invented by pro-illegal scum to hide the illegality of what people who are here illegally are doing.People who are here illegally didn't misplace any documents regardless if they came here illegally or came here legally on a visa in order to deliberately overstay that visa.
 
Undocumented is a term invented by pro-illegal scum to hide the illegality of what people who are here illegally are doing.People who are here illegally didn't misplace any documents regardless if they came here illegally or came here legally on a visa in order to deliberately overstay that visa.

That too.
 
I think the most important part of this is the pending litigation from the family of the girl in San Francisco.

If Sanctuary cities are held liable for not upholding laws designed to protect legal citizens from actions by illegal citizens, then cities may begin "meshing" with federal law as its written not how they want to interpret it so that can turn a blind eye to illegal immigration for political points.

A city has a much higher fiduciary duty to legal citizens than to illegal ones, no matter what they want to be called. Sanctuary cities fly in the face of that idea.
 
I agree with all but one thing. Those people are not undocumented immigrants or illegal immigrants. They are aliens. I prefer to call them what they actually are, rather than succumb to the PC bull**** machine. Lipstick on a pig and all.

how correct you are to say that, i believe it is the 1924 immigration law that refers to people that have entered the u.s. thru non check points as aliens
 
Read more @: Thousands protest 'anti-immigrant' legislation in Wisconsin

I applaud their actions and advocacy! I hope these bills are killed. Immigrants are not the problem no matter what their documentation status is. :applaud
[/FONT][/COLOR]

Illegal aliens protesting isn't an issue that I am going to concern myself with. They aren't citizens so they can't vote. I wonder how it would be received if I moved to Canada illegally and insisted that I should be able to live of their dime. They always have the choice to go back where they came from. I actually think we should cut any federal funding to any city that is a sanctuary city.
 
Illegal aliens protesting isn't an issue that I am going to concern myself with. They aren't citizens so they can't vote. I wonder how it would be received if I moved to Canada illegally and insisted that I should be able to live of their dime. They always have the choice to go back where they came from. I actually think we should cut any federal funding to any city that is a sanctuary city.

agree with this.

can you imagine going into Canada or some other country - "I know i snuck in like a skunk BUT I GOT BIG RIGHTS!!!"

its all so silly

god forbid you try that same BS in THEIR countries down in central or south america.
 
And the people in the OP story call that racist?

On a side note, I don't know why its always the people from Mexico and Latin American countries and their supporters always playing the 'racist' card when Hispanic and/or Latino are not races.
They could try and claim prejudice or bigotry I suppose but no racism.
 
On a side note, I don't know why its always the people from Mexico and Latin American countries and their supporters always playing the 'racist' card when Hispanic and/or Latino are not races.
They could try and claim prejudice or bigotry I suppose but no racism.
(emphasis added by me)

I've never really thought of it that way before. I'll have to give that some thought before I agree or disagree. I think you're trying to make a distinction between race and ethnicity - is that correct?
 
(emphasis added by me)

I've never really thought of it that way before. I'll have to give that some thought before I agree or disagree. I think you're trying to make a distinction between race and ethnicity - is that correct?

They are ethnicities, a Hispanic person is considered Caucasian. per the census bureau "...no separate racial category exists for Hispanic and Latino Americans, as they do not constitute a race...."
forms will say Caucasian/white and then have a separate ethnicity checkbox for Hispanic or latino - or non Hispanic or latino.
 
They are ethnicities, a Hispanic person is considered Caucasian. per the census bureau "...no separate racial category exists for Hispanic and Latino Americans, as they do not constitute a race...."
forms will say Caucasian/white and then have a separate ethnicity checkbox for Hispanic or latino - or non Hispanic or latino.

That's what I thought you were saying. Thank you for confirming. I agree.
 
Probably. Do those who have no right to be here have the right to protest?

Since when do immigrants not have the "right to be here"? I mean, I understand in Trump fantasy land this is the case, but lets come back to reality...
 
I've said nothing about what you are "standing up against"
Firstly, thank you for ignoring all of my questions in my post. Simply trying to figure out and clarify what the **** you are talking about.

Second... Yes you have said something about what I am "standing up against" (you know the questions you ignored). Here are some examples:
Post #21: " simply described your own actions in disregarding the Constitution and in protesting legal legislation in one of our States"
Post #21: "
you shouldn't get defensive about me pointing out what you are doing, showing that your actions are typical for a socialist and that they mimic that guy...Obama's...actions"
Post #8: "you want to selectively abide by the Constitution and you oppose legal legislative actions in one of our fifty States."


and I've certainly said nothing about sanctuary cities.
You dont have to. Do you even know what this thread is essentially about? The topic of the protest and the bill subject? Did you read the link? Its essentially the topic of the thread/protest/bill....


Exactly what are you talking about?
Trying to figure out what your posts are about....
 
Since when do immigrants not have the "right to be here"? I mean, I understand in Trump fantasy land this is the case, but lets come back to reality...

These bills are not about immigrants. but rather illegal border invaders and those who aid and abet. No one knows for sure how many of the protesters are here legally as no one bothers to find out.

Since these bills do not affect legal immigrants, it's a safe bet that the majority of the protesters are either border invaders or aiders and abbetors.
 
Since when do immigrants not have the "right to be here"? I mean, I understand in Trump fantasy land this is the case, but lets come back to reality...

Since no one is saying that - huge strawman on your part. Illegal aliens are NOT immigrants. They are here illegally.
 
I sympathize with people who want to come here and become Americans. That sympathy turns into stubborn rejection when the very first thing that person does is break our laws. Committing a crime cannot be condoned as the first step to a better life.
 
When they refer to it as:
"A Day Without Latinos and Immigrants in Wisconsin"
Then it IS racist. I understand the reason for the Bills, but how people refer to them says what is the real intent.
 
When they refer to it as:
"A Day Without Latinos and Immigrants in Wisconsin"
Then it IS racist. I understand the reason for the Bills, but how people refer to them says what is the real intent.

It's not the bills' authors who came up with that, but the groups supporting the illegal aliens.
 
I prefer just illegals. The term "undocumented immigrant" was invented by illegals and anti-Americans to hide the illegality of what the illegals are doing.

Just like that joke calling a drug pusher and " unlicensed pharmacist "

They are here ILLEGALLY, which makes them ILLEGAL aliens/immigrants.
 
Just like that joke calling a drug pusher and " unlicensed pharmacist "

They are here ILLEGALLY, which makes them ILLEGAL aliens/immigrants.
I am surprised the media has not called drug dealers "unlicensed pharmacists", non-traditional pharmacists" or some other term to hide the illegality and stigma of what these drug dealers are doing.
 
These bills are not about immigrants. but rather illegal border invaders and those who aid and abet. No one knows for sure how many of the protesters are here legally as no one bothers to find out.

Since these bills do not affect legal immigrants, it's a safe bet that the majority of the protesters are either border invaders or aiders and abbetors.

I say, let them have a HUGE rally. The FBI and ICE have that facial recognition software. They can scan the crowd, then spend the next few months rounding them all up and deporting them. They can divide the scan into 100 sectors and assign one agent per sector to send each face through the database and add a whole lot more to it, plus locate a few they have been looking for. WIN-WIN.

but all of this would be a non issue if those in our own government would quit giving them all that free stuff that WE all worked for and they get for free.
 
I am surprised the media has not called drug dealers "unlicensed pharmacists", non-traditional pharmacists" or some other term to hide the illegality and stigma of what these drug dealers are doing.

Give them time. I am sure they have it on the back burner just waiting for the right time.
 
Firstly, thank you for ignoring all of my questions in my post. Simply trying to figure out and clarify what the **** you are talking about.

Second... Yes you have said something about what I am "standing up against" (you know the questions you ignored). Here are some examples:
Post #21: " simply described your own actions in disregarding the Constitution and in protesting legal legislation in one of our States"
Post #21: "
you shouldn't get defensive about me pointing out what you are doing, showing that your actions are typical for a socialist and that they mimic that guy...Obama's...actions"
Post #8: "you want to selectively abide by the Constitution and you oppose legal legislative actions in one of our fifty States."



You dont have to. Do you even know what this thread is essentially about? The topic of the protest and the bill subject? Did you read the link? Its essentially the topic of the thread/protest/bill....



Trying to figure out what your posts are about....

I don't have much hope in you ever figuring out what my posts are about since you obviously don't want to know what they are about.
 
Back
Top Bottom