• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Serious racism afoot at the University of Wisconsin

TurtleDude

TurtleDude

warrior of the wetlands
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 12, 2005
Messages
281,619
Reaction score
100,389
Location
Ohio
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
The odds ratio favoring African Americans and Hispanics over whites was 576-to-1 and 504-to-1, respectively, using the SAT and class rank while controlling for other factors. Thus, the median composite SAT score for black admittees was 150 points lower than for whites and Asians, and the Latino median SAT score was 100 points lower. Using the ACT, the odds ratios climbed to 1330-to-1 and 1494-to-1, respectively, for African Americans and Hispanics over whites.

For law school admissions, the racial discrimination found was also severe, with the weight given to ethnicity much greater than given to, for example, Wisconsin residency. Thus, an out-of-state black applicant with grades and LSAT scores at the median for that group would have had a 7 out 10 chance of admission and an out-of-state Hispanic a 1 out of 3 chance—but an in-state Asian with those grades and scores had a 1 out of 6 chance and an in-state white only a 1 out of 10 chance.

http://www.ceousa.org/content/view/929/119/
 
And liberals like to prance around pretending that they're not racists. This news is disgusting. So much for merit. The biggest victims here are poor-whites living in Wisconsin who fall on the margin of being admitted or denied. The upper-class white kids always have other options.
 
Direct qualm:

The study’s conclusions (or at least the presentationthereof) are a simple mathematical disconnect. The odds include the likelihoodof being included in a quota, either directly or indirectly. If the quota wasremoved, the odds would appear similar. In order to disguise this sleight ofhand, the study utilizes ‘composite medians’ instead of means; however, thedisassociation of a quota remains within the calculation.

Meta qualm (presumably):

The cultural bias argument, which I believe is a matter ofeconomic cultural bias, must be included (to some extent). Blacks and Hispanicsare more likely a lower economic class, for different reasons (history andrecent immigrant, respectively). As there exists a correlation between Blacks/Hispanicsand lower economic class/culture, the system’s bias (via quotas) is acorrection for not only ethnic culture but economic culture in seeking out the brightestminds for acceptance (let’s not pretend that affirmative action is only aboutrace). It is unlikely that the study controlled for this, the fundamentalmotive, impact upon the disconnected odds.



@RiverDad

Is your interpretation of the OP quotation under the same lens as this:

http://www.debatepolitics.com/educa...ap-being-injected-into-schools-gardening.html

I’d contend they are equally attentive. The reaction to Rush’s analysis parallels the reaction to this disconnect of an analysis; that being,without question or knowledge.
 
TurtleDude said:
The odds ratio favoring African Americans and Hispanics over whites was 576-to-1 and 504-to-1....
http://www.ceousa.org/content/view/929/119/
Click to expand...

I do believe universities should provide for a multi-ethnic environment. Not just for the ethnicities that often come from disadvantaged places in life, but for caucasian students who will graduate and and work in a multi-ethnic work environment. Having said this, at face value, this is indeed overboard. I am curious to know if the study was calibrated for family income. In other words, if you take average test scores for students coming from a family income less than (let's just say $50,000/year) how would thatest score comparisons look. Do you know if this data exists?

Republican Racism
 
Racism is the belief that one race is superior or inferior to another.

I see no racism mentioned in the OP.
 
Thunder said:
Racism is the belief that one race is superior or inferior to another.

I see no racism mentioned in the OP.
Click to expand...

The odds ratio favoring African Americans and Hispanics over whites was 576-to-1 and 504-to-1, respectively, using the SAT and class rank while controlling for other factors. Thus, the median composite SAT score for black admittees was 150 points lower than for whites and Asians, and the Latino median SAT score was 100 points lower. Using the ACT, the odds ratios climbed to 1330-to-1 and 1494-to-1, respectively, for African Americans and Hispanics over whites.
Click to expand...

So if the reverse were true, it wouldn't be racism?
 
seems quite egregious until you get to the part about the overall percentage of applicants........how disengenuous.

Table 2. Racial/Ethnic Composition of Applicants and Admittees
Year
2007
Applicants Admittees
Black 2.60% 2.90%

Hispanic 3.10% 4.40%

Asian 7.90% 7.80%

White 86.40% 84.90%

2008
Black 2.20% 2.60%

Hispanic 3.20% 4.60%

Asian 7.50% 7.30%

White 87.10% 85.50%
 
Last edited:
liblady said:
seems quite egregious until you get to the part about the overall percentage of applicants........how disengenuous.

Table 2. Racial/Ethnic Composition of Applicants and Admittees
Year
2007
Black Admittees Applicants
2.60% 2.90%

Hispanic 3.10% 4.40%

Asian 7.90% 7.80%

White 86.40% 84.90%

2008
Black 2.20% 2.60%

Hispanic 3.20% 4.60%

Asian 7.50% 7.30%

White 87.10% 85.50%
Click to expand...

So because there's more white applicants at a school, it's best to favor non-whites over them at the probable cost of competency?
 
liblady said:
seems quite egregious until you get to the part about the overall percentage of applicants........how disengenuous.

Table 2. Racial/Ethnic Composition of Applicants and Admittees
Year
2007
Black Admittees Applicants
2.60% 2.90%

Hispanic 3.10% 4.40%

Asian 7.90% 7.80%

White 86.40% 84.90%

2008
Black 2.20% 2.60%

Hispanic 3.20% 4.60%

Asian 7.50% 7.30%

White 87.10% 85.50%
Click to expand...

Not to mention that SAT's and LSAT's are a ineffective measure of a persons qualifications

But the white racists will always complain when their racist measures are not considered sacrosanct
 
Wake said:
So because there's more white applicants at a school, it's best to favor non-whites over them at the probable cost of competency?
Click to expand...

is there something wrong with a private institution having cultural diversity as a goal?
 
Thunder said:
is there something wrong with a private institution having cultural diversity as a goal?
Click to expand...

Of course there is!! Schools are meant to collect people who score high on tests. Anything else is just silly :roll:
 
Thunder said:
is there something wrong with a private institution having cultural diversity as a goal?
Click to expand...

In that it uses racism to make things "more fair"? I'd wager yes.

Competency should be the main factor in getting into a college. Not skin color.
 
sangha said:
Of course there is!! Schools are meant to collect people who score high on tests. Anything else is just silly :roll:
Click to expand...

There's nothing wrong with diversity. It certainly helps students, but the notion that diversity should be equated with race is ridiculous.
 
DrunkenAsparagus said:
There's nothing wrong with diversity. It certainly helps students, but the notion that diversity should be equated with race is ridiculous.
Click to expand...

I said nothing about diversity. I mentioned the foolishness (and possible racism) of using a test that doesn't measure anything worthwhile wrt qualifications for admittance to college and law school
 
DrunkenAsparagus said:
There's nothing wrong with diversity. It certainly helps students, but the notion that diversity should be equated with race is ridiculous.
Click to expand...

Race in this context is a conception instituted by western european culture on members of perceived races. Are we going to act like it hasn't existed for the last 500 years? Or that it's meaningless now? Ethnic policy could be better... but its not like anyone is willing to do this any other way.
 
Thunder said:
a school that is racially, religiously, & ethnically diverse is a worth-while goal.
Click to expand...

School's focus is academics, not diversity.
 
Wake said:
School's focus is academics, not diversity.
Click to expand...

And when one race dominates to the detriment of others... for say... 500 years up to 50 years ago.... then wat? Sorry if actually accomplishing things and having goals as a nation and working between races is hard, i feel like a victim too... :roll:
 
SE102 said:
And when one race dominates to the detriment of others... for say... 500 years up to 50 years ago.... then wat? Sorry if actually accomplishing things and having goals as a nation and working between races is hard, i feel like a victim too... :roll:
Click to expand...

So use racism to favor the less competent over the more competent?

sangha said:
Is that why they give out preferences to legacy students and atheletes?

For the academics?
Click to expand...

What do you mean by legacy student?

School is for learning. Not sports. Not politics. Not diversity.

It is for learning important topics like science and math.
 
Wake said:
What do you mean by legacy student?
Click to expand...


Applicants who are excepted because their parents went to the school. It's done to encourage the parents to donate money to the school where, you know, they focus on "academics" :lol:


School is for learning. Not sports. Not politics. Not diversity.
It is for learning important topics like science and math.
Click to expand...

Actually, many are for making money. And govts give them money for many reasons, not just learning.

Stating your beliefs as facts do not make your beliefs magically transform into facts
 
Wake said:
So use racism to favor the less competent over the more competent?
Click to expand...

It's not racism theres no conception of a superior race or a would be caste system in this case. It's strategic redistribution of education opportunities to break a construct of a caste system that has existed for 500 years. Perspective please if we actually want to address this?
 
sangha said:
Applicants who are excepted because their parents went to the school. It's done to encourage the parents to donate money to the school where, you know, they focus on "academics" :lol:




Actually, many are for making money. And govts give them money for many reasons, not just learning.

Stating your beliefs as facts do not make your beliefs magically transform into facts
Click to expand...

School is meant for learning.

Not for donating money. Not to be a business. Etc.

School is meant for learning academic issues.



school/sko͞ol/


Noun: An institution for educating children.

Verb: Send to school; educate.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom