Originally Posted by Catz Part Deux

When you see it mapped out like that, it's actually kind of frightening.

Originally Posted by mbig

G-man, I have to agree with apocalypse and Harshow.. you're trolling here.

Examples have been given THROUGHOUT the string.

You want it redocumented.. or rather, in an insincere fashion, feel free to just ignore it All and just say "no".

Unlike your posts, genuine replies at least attempting rebuttal Have been made.
ie,
http://www.debatepolitics.com/middle...post1058272155 (Can anyone explain . . . (Israel))

Whereas you're just thumbing your nose at the string and board, pretending they haven't.
-

Originally Posted by bub

the green line,
- that's the border recognised by the UN,
- that's a fair border IMO
- and that's probably the only viable border because the colonies and the "security fence" cut West-Bank into a patchwork of isolated "Palestinian islands". It's impossible for the Palestinians to build an economy as long as they're prevented from going to their fields or if they've got to wait hours at check-points when they want to go to the next town.

Originally Posted by mbig

NOT SO: I always post this to try and avoid the usual wrong assertion.

http://www.debatepolitics.com/middle...-occupied.html (Resolution 242; 1967 Borders; "illegal" even "Occupied")

Feel free to reply there or here. You never did challenge it when posted.

Originally Posted by G-Man

The UN Gaza Report is 575 pages long! I seriously doubt you have read it since you are linking your post to a previous post from Tashah. If you have not even read it how can you offer this as 'proof' of your premise? Tashah's interpretation of the report and its conclusions are hardly unbiased.

Anyway, ignoring the above points there was a 'war', the UN Human Rights group investigated the conduct of the two sides during the 'war' and came up with a report at the end. I'm not entirely sure why you regard this as some sort of unique criticism reserved for Israel. The report actually criticised the Palestinians as well you know. Is your argument that if the war did not involve Israel then there would not have been a UN investigation/report?

As for mbig's post it starts off - What explains most of the world's dislike of Israel?

Whether most of the world dislikes Israel or not that does not mean that it has came in for criticism which would not have been given out had it not been Israel.

Rather than post other posters arguments why not post examples of why YOU feel that Israel receives unique criticism which no other nation on earth receives.

Originally Posted by bub

ok i'll read that


I see, you're a manichean. Black vs White, Good vs Bad, Pro- vs Anti-Israel...

Originally Posted by Wessexman

Come on bub, you must have noticed by now that one has to disregard a lot of those who post in the ME forum, many are at least borderline trolls.

Originally Posted by Gardener

To be fair, I might point out that you and Bub only go there occasionally.

Originally Posted by Wessexman

We can't always live up to your example I'm afraid.

Originally Posted by Gardener

Not with your minds all brainwashed by all that Eurabian propaganda your media subjects you to, you can't.