• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

DEA withholds names of agents who raided two innocent women. Federal court shrugs.

Re: DEA withholds names of agents who raided two innocent women. Federal court shrugs

radcen said:
For nine years, DEA withholds names of masked agents who violently raided two innocent women. Federal court shrugs.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-federal-court-shrugs/?utm_term=.f6c6c4eec23d

Thread title shortened to fit.
Click to expand...


It is no simple call, what to do. While I believe strongly that the names of officers should be known, I do feel uneasy about giving the names to drug dealers they broke.
 
Re: DEA withholds names of agents who raided two innocent women. Federal court shrugs

Before there was the fraud of the War On Terror, there was the fraud of the War On Drugs. :roll:
 
Re: DEA withholds names of agents who raided two innocent women. Federal court shrugs

Thoreau72 said:
Before there was the fraud of the War On Terror, there was the fraud of the War On Drugs. :roll:
Click to expand...
And before that, there was the Constitution ... :(
 
Re: DEA withholds names of agents who raided two innocent women. Federal court shrugs

Chomsky said:
And before that, there was the Constitution ... :(
Click to expand...
It boggles my brain cells that anyone who claims to respect the Constitution would buy into this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom