• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Discrimination against Transgenders Justified?, Convince me minority.

Which is not exactly the same as the previous argument.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's your counter? It isn't "exact"?

Figures... what a cowardly dodge....

Pretty much nothing in our lives is "exact"
 
You are a "if a tree falls and nobody is around... does it make a sound?" Kinda person. Thats cool.

You are a make claims and can't back them up kind of person, that's cool.
 
The argument here... right now... is that YOU IGNORED IT...

You did and you still are. You can lie to yourself all you like.
That's not an argument it's a lie. I didn't ignore it, I noticed your replay, I read it, I understood and recognized it was wrong, I saw others expose it as such and am now acknowledging for a second time I read it and what I did. By definition I didn't ignore it. So the only lie here is your if you continue to try and sell it but it's been proven wrong, feel free to deny that if you like :)

Ignore | Define Ignore at Dictionary.com
1. to refrain from noticing or recognizing
 
You are a make claims and can't back them up kind of person, that's cool.

I can back them up. Why do you say because I wont that what i say is wrong? Does that still work on kids?
 
I can back them up. Why do you say because I wont that what i say is wrong? Does that still work on kids?
Links and quote then please, thank you. :)
 
That's not an argument it's a lie. I didn't ignore it, I noticed your replay, I read it, I understood and recognized it was wrong, I saw others expose it as such and am now acknowledging for a second time I read it and what I did. By definition I didn't ignore it. So the only lie here is your if you continue to try and sell it but it's been proven wrong, feel free to deny that if you like :)

Ignore | Define Ignore at Dictionary.com
1. to refrain from noticing or recognizing

At DP the term ignore means being in a debate and not responding to posts about that debate. Sorry you were ignorant. Glad I could help educate you on the basics. Want to respond now or will you continue to ignore the post?
 
Links and quote then please, thank you. :)

What part of I am not intersted in looking for that confuses you?.

Don't believe facts. I don't care all that much.
 
At DP the term ignore means being in a debate and not responding to posts about that debate. Sorry you were ignorant. Glad I could help educate you on the basics. Want to respond now or will you continue to ignore the post?

HAHAHAHAHA so according to you, here at DP people like you just make up lies and everybody has to follow their fantasy. Awesome! Sorry I live in reality and there's no reality that exists where I ignored your post. You got burned and got burned bad, try something new, I'm sure that will fail too. :)
 
That's not an argument it's a lie. I didn't ignore it, I noticed your replay, I read it, I understood and recognized it was wrong, I saw others expose it as such and am now acknowledging for a second time I read it and what I did. By definition I didn't ignore it. So the only lie here is your if you continue to try and sell it but it's been proven wrong, feel free to deny that if you like :)

Ignore | Define Ignore at Dictionary.com
1. to refrain from noticing or recognizing

How is it a lie and who exposed it?:)
 
What part of I am not intersted in looking for that confuses you?.

Don't believe facts. I don't care all that much.

I get it, you can't back up your lies I don't care either just find it funny you got caught.
 
Yes I know there's a bunch of threads out there about this topic but many are polluted with other topics, started as jokes or on disingenuous terms. So I wanted a thread that tries to convince the majority that there is justifiable reasons to discriminate against transgenders. The majority or people are against laws that discriminate against transgenders but it seems there are some that support it. I've read I should be scared and it puts me in danger, well I don't see how it does or how that justifies discrimination. I've read that it violates my rights as a woman but I don't know any rights that are violated by this. I've been asked if I want "these people" around me or my daughter and I don't care, I don't see how this changes the dynamics of public facilities.

As a huge participant in sports, being a collegiate athlete I have and being a "gym rat" from time to time I don't see how this changes anything. Transgenders have been using the facilities of their choice all my life and it's never been an issue. Also spending large amounts of time in these facilities I'd like to know where are all these facilities (locker rooms and showers) where there is just nudity everywhere? People's "junk" just out and about for all to see? I've never been to a facility where it wasn't one's choice to expose themselves to others or see others exposed. Have I seen nudity? Yes of course, have I been a little nude, topless for a second maybe (college sports facility locker room), yes. But it was still my choice, it's rare and I could have used a stall.

I'm just not seeing anything reasonable that changes the dynamic of public facilities and that all of a sudden puts me in danger or impacts my rights? My public facility routine and situational awareness remains unchanged. So let's hear it, convince me I'm in danger, my privacy is being violated and give me reasons that justifies discrimination against transgenders and why it should be law.

This whole thing sorta reminds of an episode of Star Trek The Next Generation wherein the android Data is, in the end described a new species of being.

I think that "transgender" is homosexuality taken to the inth degree. The very first episode of this, in my memory, was in 1970 with The Christine Jorgensen Story. It got buried and the gay movement was really underground and had a seedy aura about it, so people who knew nothing were naturally sort of intimidated and fearful? of it.

It's not been that long since '69 and people like Bruce Jenner is reeeaaallly more related to science fiction than any reality we're used to. That may seem very harsh on the surface, but if you take it for what it really is (plastic surgery to the umpteenth power) you an see why people shy from it: it seems like trouble to them and they don't want to be involved. I think that the in your face movements of the gay generation have hurt more than helped to instigate knee-jerk reactions and this bathroom thing only took a bad situation and made it worse.
 
HAHAHAHAHA so according to you, here at DP people like you just make up lies and everybody has to follow their fantasy. Awesome! Sorry I live in reality and there's no reality that exists where I ignored your post. You got burned and got burned bad, try something new, I'm sure that will fail too. :)

Afraid to tackle "the lie" that having a mens room for men and a womens room for women is not discrimination...? Got it.:)
 
This whole thing sorta reminds of an episode of Star Trek The Next Generation wherein the android Data is, in the end described a new species of being.

I think that "transgender" is homosexuality taken to the inth degree. The very first episode of this, in my memory, was in 1970 with The Christine Jorgensen Story. It got buried and the gay movement was really underground and had a seedy aura about it, so people who knew nothing were naturally sort of intimidated and fearful? of it.

It's not been that long since '69 and people like Bruce Jenner is reeeaaallly more related to science fiction than any reality we're used to. That may seem very harsh on the surface, but if you take it for what it really is (plastic surgery to the umpteenth power) you an see why people shy from it: it seems like trouble to them and they don't want to be involved. I think that the in your face movements of the gay generation have hurt more than helped to instigate knee-jerk reactions and this bathroom thing only took a bad situation and made it worse.

Transgener =/= homsexuality on any level whatsoever. Sexual orientation is independent of gender identity.
 
Afraid to tackle "the lie" that having a mens room for men and a womens room for women is not discrimination...? Got it.:)

It was already proven wrong in this thread, you want to act like it wasn't, got it :)
 
yes . . .
It's a lie or ignorance. Pick one :)

Wont prove anything. Got it. Well... cant say your debating skills merit any more time. :)
 
Post #25, you're welcome, have a nice day! :)

Nope. He failed. Transgender women are actual biologically me. No discrimination.

Wanna try again?
 
Nope. He failed. Transgender women are actual biologically me. No discrimination.

Wanna try again?

HAHAHAHA why do you lie, he was completely successful and right supported by law.
 
From failed logic and lack of knowledge?

Gladly... with arms flailing' in fact.

If you do that you'll look just as stupid as your posts do now, your stories are fine by me, fact remains you can't backup your claim.
 
Back
Top Bottom