• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fbi 'rewrites law' to let her off...

Did he or did he not get his latest "it's not a Star of David, it's really a sheriff's star" attack directly from a white supremacist website?

And while we're at it, his slogan, "America First". Guess who else is twittering hashtag-AmericaFirst? A guy named David Duke. Perhaps you should look up who else used the slogan "America First".

Really, how much does it take for y'all to get a clue that y'all have not just nominated a racist, but that racism is informing a great deal of the positions on the Right? Most Republicans aren't racist - or at least honestly don't think they're racist - but the positions they hold are strongly influenced by those same racist "negrophobes" (and their children) in the Deep South that Nixon directly courted as a part of his "Southern Strategy". Y'all's chickens, sir, are coming home to roost...but personally, I think they're closer to being a near-perpetual albatross around the neck of the GOP (if you don't know the reference, read "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner").

I don't think it matters where the star of David came from, the image is obtainable on Hebrew websites. Also the slogan is " make America Great".

If you would connect Obama endorsers to Obama he never would have one.
 
It sure does!



No doubt about it!



I say it all the time as well and I've never had anything to do with White Supremacists, other than arrest them.

And that is NOT a Star of David, on Trump's website.

Look it up, guy - he got the image directly from a white supremacist website. Of course, I'm not sure that bothers you one whit.
 
Want a hanky to wipe the tears?

Don't worry, you'll still have plenty of opportunity to vote for the guy who gets information and opinion from white supremacist websites.

And you can enjoy a government that requires everyone surrounding that witch to plea the fifth !! You must be proud . :roll:
 
Why do you keep forgetting I am neither a member of the GOP, nor a "conservative" except where it comes to the Second Amendment?

Now don't try to take us on a red herring trail with comments about Iran-Contra, or Valarie Plame/Dick Cheney. I never supported Bush Jr or his policies. Nor did I ever condone Iran-contra.

Raising those issues does not detract from THIS issue.

As a serving officer of the Federal Government, Hillary broke the law, did it knowingly and willingly, and tried to hide it. Now her Party is trying to make it go away.

Saying that past President's and member's of their cabinets have gotten away with criminal behaviors neither excuses her nor them.

And what you're doing is the old trick of "But it's the law!"

Come now. You've been around the block a few times yourself, and you KNOW that it would be not just unusual but flat-out wrong to prosecute her when worse cases of wrongdoing by the other side are legion. You KNOW this.

What's more, you also know that for all the myriad witch hunts the Right has conducted against the Clintons, only this (and Bill's adventure with a certain cigar) have stuck. That's it. Out of all the scores of things the Right has accused them of.

Heck, look at the Benghazi fiasco - it's been what, seven, eight investigations, most of which were chaired and run by Trey Gowdy and the House GOP Hit Squad? And what did they find on Hillary? NOTHING. Time after time after time after time, NOTHING...but what did they do? Did they stop? No. They kept going with yet more investigations at taxpayer expense, even after Trey Gowdy's own military liaison quit in protest at his witchhuntery.

You know doggone well it's a political game. The GOP scored some points...but all this is about, is power. And you know it. You KNOW that the only way they can possibly win in November is to get Hillary out of the way. That's all it's ever been about.
 
I fully agree!



I bet David Petraeus is pissed thou...


you would think someone at state would have taken patraeous stupidity to heart. we have a choice between an idiot and an idiot. The only thing I can think to do is stay home and get sloshed.
 
2016: Trump's biggest con to put his most valuable political investments in office (Bill and Hillary Clinton) so that he is owed political favors for life, by purposefully sabotaging his own campaign and simultaneously silencing an entire generation and cementing in place years of among the most corrupt officials the White House will ever witness.

If you're not absolutely ****ing infuriated you're not paying attention.
 
There is really no good reason that Clinton should not have been indicted based on what he said. All evidence points to Comey not doing his job.

Well the incongruity of the decision certainly isn't easy to grasp.
 
And what you're doing is the old trick of "But it's the law!"

Come now. You've been around the block a few times yourself, and you KNOW that it would be not just unusual but flat-out wrong to prosecute her when worse cases of wrongdoing by the other side are legion. You KNOW this.

Where did you learn the law? :shock:

There is no such thing in Law as "two wrongs make a right." If one commits a crime and they get caught they are supposed to be prosecuted for it.

Arguing that someone should get away with something because someone else got away with something else is basest sophistry. Moreover, that is not justice...it is an argument of privilege.

That's exactly the problem that has led to the rise of Trump and the Dem's splinter support for Sanders. People are sick and tired of the constant corruption, patronage, privilege, catering to special interest, and outright illegalities perpetrated by the Political Party Machines of BOTH parties.

Yet here you are tacitly endorsing it. :doh

What happened with Hillary in this case is just the tip of the iceberg, as I have personally observed over the last 20 years. I am fast losing faith in any chance of honest government, regardless of who holds office, but I certainly don't support a party hack like her when this kind of travesty highlights my position.
 
Where did you learn the law? :shock:

There is no such thing in Law as "two wrongs make a right." If one commits a crime and they get caught they are supposed to be prosecuted for it.

Arguing that someone should get away with something because someone else got away with something else is basest sophistry. Moreover, that is not justice...it is an argument of privilege.

That's exactly the problem that has led to the rise of Trump and the Dem's splinter support for Sanders. People are sick and tired of the constant corruption, patronage, privilege, catering to special interest, and outright illegalities perpetrated by the Political Party Machines of BOTH parties.

Yet here you are tacitly endorsing it. :doh

What happened with Hillary in this case is just the tip of the iceberg, as I have personally observed over the last 20 years. I am fast losing faith in any chance of honest government, regardless of who holds office, but I certainly don't support a party hack like her when this kind of travesty highlights my position.

Like I said, you're using the old "But it's the law!" argument. Don't worry, all the ones who are like-minded with you on this issue are trying to make the same claim.

NO, I'm not "endorsing" it - I'm simply pointing out the silly, stupid political power game of which this whole scandal is but a part. You've said time and again that you're not on the Right, that you're not aligned with the conservatives...but I really wonder just how vociferously indignant you were in the days when Bush and Co. (and Reagan and Co., and Nixon and Co.) did far worse and got away with it, with the conservatives laughing with glee.
 
And you can enjoy a government that requires everyone surrounding that witch to plea the fifth !! You must be proud . :roll:

Like AG Alberto Gonzales did when questioned during the investigation into Bush firing so many state AG's for refusing to conduct voter-fraud investigations just before a presidential election, when there was almost zero evidence of any such voter fraud to begin with?

Wanna sling mud? Go for it...'cause over the years, y'all have given us a LOT more ammo than we gave you!
 
Since there was no precedent for the SoS (or any other cabinet member) establishing a personal email server in their private home, totally outside government control (to frustrate FOIA requests?), it would be "unfair" to inconvenience HRC by charging her with a crime simply for having put classified data on it. ;)

The precedent for ignoring "minor" felony crimes committed by very high ranking public officials has now been firmly established.

We live in a lawless society at this point.
 
Like I said, you're using the old "But it's the law!" argument. Don't worry, all the ones who are like-minded with you on this issue are trying to make the same claim.

NO, I'm not "endorsing" it - I'm simply pointing out the silly, stupid political power game of which this whole scandal is but a part. You've said time and again that you're not on the Right, that you're not aligned with the conservatives...but I really wonder just how vociferously indignant you were in the days when Bush and Co. (and Reagan and Co., and Nixon and Co.) did far worse and got away with it, with the conservatives laughing with glee.

We are a nation of laws or we are not.
Evidently we are not. Or the law only applies to us peasant while those in charge are exempt.

When you prove those get back to me.
Ps Nixon resigned.
 
Like AG Alberto Gonzales did when questioned during the investigation into Bush firing so many state AG's for refusing to conduct voter-fraud investigations just before a presidential election, when there was almost zero evidence of any such voter fraud to begin with?

Wanna sling mud? Go for it...'cause over the years, y'all have given us a LOT more ammo than we gave you!

Hardly
 
I don't suppose you remember Gerald Ford giving Nixon a blanket pardon for any and all crimes he may have committed while he was president of the United States....

and if Obama had given Hillary a pardon it would have been similar except Ford cost himself the election for doing that
 
Like AG Alberto Gonzales did when questioned during the investigation into Bush firing so many state AG's for refusing to conduct voter-fraud investigations just before a presidential election, when there was almost zero evidence of any such voter fraud to begin with?

Wanna sling mud? Go for it...'cause over the years, y'all have given us a LOT more ammo than we gave you!

There are none more corrupt than the democrats and the Clintons .
 
no one has gone to prison for such an infraction which was part of Comeys dilemma.
I am not sure, those of us on the outside could say that for sure.
I think they should present the data to a grand Jury, with a Pseudonym so as not to have
Hillery's name influence the decision.
 
no one has gone to prison for such an infraction which was part of Comeys dilemma.

The law allows for a fine instead of prison as a sentence - the problem was that any felony conviction, no matter how minor, would be the end of HRC's political aspirations. No one in a cabinet level position ever exclusively used a private communications system.
 
Sure, as long as you ignore facts and documented history.

Ah, but I forgot! Y'all can't pay any attention to reality since reality has that unforgivable liberal bias....

Yep , you guys love to ignore the facts ! :roll:
 
Back
Top Bottom