- Joined
- Jul 13, 2012
- Messages
- 47,695
- Reaction score
- 10,467
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Have you read the policy directive?
Maybe that would be a good start.
Since you didn't link to it, I will. I believed I could do this. You apparently, believed that you couldn't. Since reality is based solely on what you believe, then you showing the courtesy to link to the thing you reference is impossible for you. Fair enough.
This is a ridiculous response to a probably real state of affairs for some very few in our society.
This seems to me to be more appropriately handled as an ADA consideration with reasonable accommodation being provided when the need is triggered by a complaint. The Reasonable accommodation could be providing 1 unisex washroom as opposed to providing unisex access to ALL bathrooms. Title IX? Ridiculous!
I think this un-legislated directive that comes with threat from the Obama Administration is covered with the Obama's fingerprints:
1. Was not passed because the chump is unable to talk to anyone that doesn't worship him.
2. Comes with a threat because the force of threat is the only way the chump can get anything done.
3. Is a wedge issue that divides the population.
4. Is elitist in its construction and aim.
5. Addresses a problem that really does not exist in any major way for the majority of people in the USA.
6. Helps to shore up the GBLT voting block.
7. Will probably hurt as many as it helps.
I don't deny that there are folks who think they are one gender born in the other gender's body. Woody Allen described himself once a nymphomaniac lesbian trapped in a man's body.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/file/850986/download