- Joined
- Jan 10, 2015
- Messages
- 14,012
- Reaction score
- 3,439
- Location
- Southern Oregon
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Then you should not be arguing against it...
Actually, you should go to another thread where you might have a clue....
Then you should not be arguing against it...
Look, Canada, Norway, Australia, New Zealand, etc. have gun laws that work. There are also FAR FEWER gun crimes and deaths as a result.
Then you should not be arguing against it...
How about the 10,000+ firearm homicides and 20,000+ suicide/accidental deaths per year from firearms?
Is that why those strangely obsessed with owning weapons that allow them to kill from a distance always seem to be starting threads based on lone single incidents in which a gun is used properly against another human being?
One could fairly respond with: "Fits your narrative, so flock to it?"
The overall statistics are what's relevant, if we want to go "yay guns" or "boo guns". A single success story doesn't say anything more than a single failure story...
You get real....you don't even have any experience with any of this and have no room to talk. These people were probably scared out of their wits, and thought they and their child were going to die.
How can we take you seriously? You have no experience.
The guns in Chicago are illegal for criminals and criminals can get them any time....see, you don't even have a clue here.
You want who to take you seriously? :lamo:lamo
in 40 years I have yet to see a valid argument in favor of gun bans or laws that impede honest people being armed
plus, at a federal level, its all unconstitutional
The Constitution can be amended... as you well know.
So what? We aren't them, don't want to be them and never want to be them!
Smaller populations by far and owning firearms is either not a heritage that they are proud of, or has been legislated away by some stupid nincompoop politician and voted on by clueless Moaps!!
Actually, you should go to another thread where you might have a clue....
If guns were illegal then the criminals could not get guns... and think about all the kids killed by guns too.
give it a shot-if your arguments are as convincing to 3/4 of the states etc, as they are to us, we have nothing to worry about for the next 300 years
That's outright BS. Most of the guns criminals use are already not legally gotten.
Deaths by people possessing legal guns are actually quite rare, including deaths of children.
The guns were once legal and then fell out of circulation into illegal hands...
You know this how?
...and any children dying due to guns is too many and gun nuts should be ashamed at supporting their deaths.
The guns were once legal and then fell out of circulation into illegal hands...
...and any children dying due to guns is too many and gun nuts should be ashamed at supporting their deaths.
How about the 10,000+ firearm homicides and 20,000+ suicide/accidental deaths per year from firearms?
Is that why those strangely obsessed with owning weapons that allow them to kill from a distance always seem to be starting threads based on lone single incidents in which a gun is used properly against another human being?
One could fairly respond with: "Fits your narrative, so flock to it?"
The overall statistics are what's relevant, if we want to go "yay guns" or "boo guns". A single success story doesn't say anything more than a single failure story...
While not a gun incident on the part of the perp, the number of incidents after these homeowners solved the problem themselves is now 9,999 instead of 10,002.
I am in the NRA and looked at becoming a qualified firearm instructor at one time so I know a thing or two...
I have shot and still shoot many types of fireams from pistols and shotguns to rifles and semi-automatic rifles...
Sure don't take you seriously...
The Constitution can be amended... as you well know.
give it a shot-if your arguments are as convincing to 3/4 of the states etc, as they are to us, we have nothing to worry about for the next 300 years
There is decidedly less gun violence or guns anywhere and you call that a failure that you want to distance yourself from? :lol: What a heritage you want to hold dear! :lol:
Can you start speaking in understandable English please?
That's outright BS. Most of the guns criminals use are already not legally gotten.
Deaths by people possessing legal guns are actually quite rare, including deaths of children.
Did I say that I was on a mission? Just stating facts. Gun ownes run from them all the time...
The guns were once legal and then fell out of circulation into illegal hands...
...and any children dying due to guns is too many and gun nuts should be ashamed at supporting their deaths.
In this particular incident, a legally owned gun saved a child.
stop the blood clot crocodile tears crying and Impoetent nonsense. blame the criminals and the real "gun nuts"
people who want a society only where the government and criminals have firearms
In this particular incident, a legally owned gun saved a child.
stop the blood clot crocodile tears crying and Impoetent nonsense. blame the criminals and the real "gun nuts"
people who want a society only where the government and criminals have firearms
You should...I'm the real deal!
Now see, that wasn't hard to talk about. so what is your point? Or, like TD says, are you just bored and trolling again?
Why would it need to be?................works damn good now.
LMFAO! I can see Bod in 300 years, lobbying from his grave! :lamo
No Bod, not anywhere at all. You need to go visit most of Africa, Mexico and Central America.
If I spoke any better English, you'd still bitch.
Not so at all, only in your mind. And....your facts are all jumbled.....you may speak English but can't deduce crap!
Fell out of circulation? LMFAO ....again! How about recycled Bod?
You don't know what a gun nut is and law abiding, decent citizens who own guns, don't contribute to any child deaths! Start talking sense instead of NON-sense!
Yes it did and guns save the lives of many children.
Bod can't do that, because they will laugh at him twice as loud as we do! :lamo:lamo:
In more instances legally owned guns kill a child...
What in gang related shootings? Certainly not by legal, law abiding adults.
It could work even better though...
That would be impossible...
I would rather look at 1st world nations that more accurately reflect the USA then your Straw Man stuff...
You mean, "If I spoke English any better"...
I produce crap that makes more sense than your deductions....
Fell out of circulation from "legal" hands... those are ones that are lost, stolen, etc.
Tell that to this guy:
...and killed many as well.
Oh no... not the "they"! Will they? Will they laugh at me?
Let's look at the little girl, she didn't kill any children and you are trying to pretend that she did. Disingenuous.
Irresponsible. She should have taken him prisoner but instead she shoots him and then, when he is down, the husband executes him? The husband is the very reason that guns should be banned. He starts shooting with his 5 year-old kid in the small room to boot, ridiculous.