• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Virginia Senate approves electric chair amid drug shortage

My ex-wife could talk 'em to death. I barely escaped.
 
humbolt said:
My ex-wife could talk 'em to death. I barely escaped.
Click to expand...

yeah

but cruel and unusual punishment is against the rules

otherwise it would be a wonderful idea

but my ex may have yours topped....could be a close battle :2wave:
 
humbolt said:
My ex-wife could talk 'em to death. I barely escaped.
Click to expand...

Talk? My ex didn't need any words- she could suck life out of people she passed on the sidewalk.
 
Grand Mal said:
Talk? My ex didn't need any words- she could suck life out of people she passed on the sidewalk.
Click to expand...

And in what region of the body did their life escape during this sucking.........

Just curious.....
 
gdgyva said:
would you prefer the guillotine
Click to expand...

Yes. Severing the brain stem in that way will produce unconsciousness before any pain is felt.


That should be a benefit, unless you want to grant government the power of sadism....
 
Casper said:
First off the Death Penalty is not a deterrent to violent crime, in fact many criminals would prefer it to a Life without parole sentence.
Click to expand...

If that were true, they'd be petitioning the courts to halt the appeals process like Gary Gilmore did.


gdgyva said:
so if they used a knife and cut their victims up into tiny pieces, you want the state to do that to them?
Click to expand...

I would have no problem with this. Why shouldn't they die the same way they killed their victim(s)?
 
Scrabaholic said:
If that were true, they'd be petitioning the courts to halt the appeals process like Gary Gilmore did.




I would have no problem with this. Why shouldn't they die the same way they killed their victim(s)?
Click to expand...

People still want to live and they are always sorry AFTER they get caught.

I suggested the same, seems some do not believe in an eye for an eye.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom