• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should people who are exonerated...

radcen

Phonetic Mnemonic ©
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
34,817
Reaction score
18,576
Location
Look to your right... I'm that guy.
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Centrist
Should people who are exonerated be required to answer "Yes" when asked if they've ever been convicted of a crime on a job application? Or, should they be allowed to say "No" and have that be considered the legal and/or literal truth?

Question presumes no other convictions. Question does not presume current legal status, only what *should* be for discussion purposes.
 
They should be able to say they have not been convicted. because the question is the only way you can ask if someone is guilty of a crime, which is what the askers really want to know.
 
Should people who are exonerated be required to answer "Yes" when asked if they've ever been convicted of a crime on a job application? Or, should they be allowed to say "No" and have that be considered the legal and/or literal truth?

Question presumes no other convictions. Question does not presume current legal status, only what *should* be for discussion purposes.

If they have been exonerated then the conviction is reversed and their record should also be expunged as if the conviction never occurred, so no.
 
Should people who are exonerated be required to answer "Yes" when asked if they've ever been convicted of a crime on a job application? Or, should they be allowed to say "No" and have that be considered the legal and/or literal truth?

Question presumes no other convictions. Question does not presume current legal status, only what *should* be for discussion purposes.

Yes they should be allowed to answer no.
 
Back
Top Bottom