- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Messages
- 79,903
- Reaction score
- 20,981
- Location
- I love your hate.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
These days, most departments are actively discouraging officers from grappling with subjects, and encouraging use of the Taser instead. Reasoning: statistics show reduced injuries to both officers and subjects via Taser rather than physical subdual. This tends to reduce both liability suits from injury, and workman's comp claims, and keeps insurance cheaper, and most departments keep a sharp eye on that bottom line.
The downside is the occasional Taser-related fatality, which are usually explained away as being "caused" by existing medical problems (bad heart, drugs, etc).
That's where the balance currently stands anyway, agree with it or no.
I'd like to see that study. I would say if you have someone that's a threat sure, but fleeing girls not so much,.
And does it include the newer generation of tasers that affect both the sensory nervous system and motor nervous system.
These cause a siezing action of the subject to the point they can't brace naturally when falling.