• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

John Stossel: Illegal Everything

Grizzly Adams

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet
DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 11, 2011
Messages
9,355
Reaction score
3,238
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Libertarian
A long-but-worth-it report by John Stossel on how governments at all levels are criminalizing and regulating more and more. The segments on the EPA and taxis are especially infuriating. But I'll be honest; I found the whole video to be frustrating.

 
It's been said the power to tax is the power to destroy!
I guess the power to regulate and legislate are also the power to destroy!
 
Stossel bet O'Reilly $1000 that Ron Paul would win a primary. How accurate has he been about that?
 
Stossel bet O'Reilly $1000 that Ron Paul would win a primary. How accurate has he been about that?
Even if your claim is true, I don't see how it's relevant to this thread.
 
Last edited:
A long-but-worth-it report by John Stossel on how governments at all levels are criminalizing and regulating more and more. The segments on the EPA and taxis are especially infuriating. But I'll be honest; I found the whole video to be frustrating.
I saw this when aired, and thought about posting something about it then changed my mind.

Anyway, yeah, the taxi thing especially pissed me off. The corporate taxi stooge representative could say nothing more than regulations were needed, yet couldn't offer a single example as to *why*. (To be fair, given Stossel, I wondered if the guy indeed had and that part ended up being edited out)

Still worthy of watching, though.
 
contraband is the govt way of propping up prices
 
A long-but-worth-it report by John Stossel on how governments at all levels are criminalizing and regulating more and more. The segments on the EPA and taxis are especially infuriating. But I'll be honest; I found the whole video to be frustrating.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBiJB8YuDBQ]
There were several things in here I found disturbing, especially the parts about filming police. While I can understand live TV/video being an issue in police situations I will never understand where recording police actions should ever be a problem. I really liked the California LEO that was all for it - good for him! I doubt if the Super-Troopers here would object either, though there are some small-towns and rookies that would probably have kittens and overstep. That's a matter of training and experience.

As far as the EPA story goes, I have to wonder about the details in that story. He fleetingly mentioned the Corp of Engineers, which means that it may have been a flood/elevation issue. If you do the proper research, which basically means doing an actual survey of your property instead of just guessing everything, then the flood control issues are covered. My guess is they didn't have a survey done.

The taxi problem in DC may be a scam, IDK, but having driven a taxi for a couple of years here I'm glad they limit the number of cabs here. We simply don't have enough taxi business here to merit having 1000 taxis. If there were that many then no cabbie could make a living because there wouldn't be enough business to support anyone. You'd have 4 hours worth of work (in 24) spread out over 1000 cabs instead of 16 hours over the ~250 we have. Rates are controlled locally, not by the cabbie or company, though driver's often give discounts to repeat customers.



Overall I don't think it's the legislation that gets out of hand as much as enforcement. I've been saying since HS that any cop can follow anybody for a day and write at least one ticket, probably several. No one drive's perfectly - but I understand everybody thinks they do. ;) Good police officers ignore most infractions they see and concentrate on the ones that really count - or might count in court, like when there's an accident. The two officers who bought the lemonade were being good officers and probably bumped it upstairs, instead of making a scene. The ones afterward were most likely following orders.

I don't think there would be a problem with a lemonade stand here. We have roadside fruit stands (run by adults out of pick-up trucks) all over the place beginning in July and going through Sep/Oct. Never seen one shut down yet as long as it's on private property and doesn't obstruct traffic. :)
 
Last edited:
I saw this when aired, and thought about posting something about it then changed my mind.

Anyway, yeah, the taxi thing especially pissed me off. The corporate taxi stooge representative could say nothing more than regulations were needed, yet couldn't offer a single example as to *why*. (To be fair, given Stossel, I wondered if the guy indeed had and that part ended up being edited out)

Still worthy of watching, though.

NPR's Planet Money did an episode on taxi medallions and why the cost so much. It can be downloaded here or on iTunes.

The Tuesday Podcast: Why Does A Taxi Medallion Cost $1 Million? : Planet Money : NPR
 
I saw this when aired, and thought about posting something about it then changed my mind.

Anyway, yeah, the taxi thing especially pissed me off. The corporate taxi stooge representative could say nothing more than regulations were needed, yet couldn't offer a single example as to *why*. (To be fair, given Stossel, I wondered if the guy indeed had and that part ended up being edited out)

Still worthy of watching, though.
Regardless of what may have been edited OUT, you can't edit IN his comment about how the little guy should be squeezed out of the market unless he actually said it. That was the most scream-at-your-TV-in-rage-worthy moment of the whole report, IMHO.
 
Regardless of what may have been edited OUT, you can't edit IN his comment about how the little guy should be squeezed out of the market unless he actually said it. That was the most scream-at-your-TV-in-rage-worthy moment of the whole report, IMHO.
I agree. I'm just saying that if there was an attempt at balance that I/we should have been allowed to see it and judge for ourselves. I have a hard time believing that any industry spokesman would just sit there and say "It's a good thing" over and over. They would have been better off doing the standard "We decline to comment" spiel.
 
Back
Top Bottom