• We will be taking the forum down for maintenance at [3:30 PM CDT] - in 25 minutes. We should be down less than 1 hour.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

the myth of American Justice

bhug

New member
Joined
Jun 20, 2007
Messages
30
Reaction score
4
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
11.10.18 the myth of american justice -- that only the guilty get arrested, charged, and incarcerated. More than 846,000 black men were incarcerated in 2008, according to US Bureau of Justice estimates reported by NewsOne. African Americans make up 13.6 percent of the US population according to census data, but black men reportedly make up 40.2 percent of all prison inmates. The arguments and rationalizations that have been trotted out in support of racial exclusion and discrimination in its various forms (e.g. denying colourds citizenship was deemed essential to the formation of the original union) did not form the US into an egalitarian democracy. More black men were disenfranchised due to felony convictions in 2004 than in 1870, "the year the Fifteenth Amendment was ratified prohibiting laws that explicitly deny the right to vote on the basis of race," the number of blacks who are incarcerated has surged, mainly due to a single law enforcement policy... the War on Drugs, a war waged almost exclusively in poor communities of color; ref1 that crime-fighting measure "is a big part of the reason that a black child born today is less likely to be raised by both parents than a black child born during slavery. ref2 Hundreds of thousands of black men have disappeared into prisons and jails, locked away for drug crimes that are largely ignored when committed by whites. The war on drugs has not been aimed at rooting out drug kingpins or violent drug offenders, rather it has been focused overwhelmingly on low-level drug offenses, like marijuana possession -- the very crimes that happen with equal frequency in middle class white communities. In 2005, for example, four out of five drug arrests were for possession and only one out of five were for sales. Most people in state prison for drug offenses have no history of violence or significant selling activity. Nearly 80 percent of the increase in drug arrests in the 1990s -- the period of the most dramatic expansion of the drug war -- was for marijuana possession, a drug less harmful than alcohol or tobacco. In some states, though, negroes have comprised 80 to 90 percent of all drug convictions. This is The New Jim Crow. People of colour are rounded up -- frequently at young ages -- for relatively minor drug offenses, branded felons, and then relegated to a permanent second-class status in which they may be denied the right to vote, automatically excluded from juries, and subjected to legal discrimination in employment, housing, access to education, and public benefits. There are more blacks under correctional control today -- in prison or jail, on probation or parole -- than were enslaved in 1850, a decade before the Civil War began.
 
Sounds like the best solution is for African-Americans to stop using drugs.

Not to mention your argument "More blacks today are X than in 1850/70" fails because there are more blacks now than then, would you mind posting those stats again as percentage of population?
 
While the application of police power is hardly equally distributed between urban blacks and suburban whites, the fact is still that most people who are arrested and tried are actually guilty. Poor, urban blacks are far more likely to be arrested in the first place (for using crack, let's say), whereas a white person in a pretty suburb will likely never be caught for using coke. There aren't nearly as many cops on the lookout for white kids using drugs, despite the fact that drug use is actually slightly higher among whites than blacks.

It's fine to be pissed about this, and rightful to be so. But at least correctly understand the problem. Young black males are not being convicted of crimes they have not committed. They are simply far more scrutinized than whites who are committing equivalent crimes. No one is arresting the white kids in the first place, because the public outcry is based on the false notion that drug use is a black thing.

Of course, the answer isn't to simply arrest more white kids. It's to stop with the whole prohibition of drugs nonsense entirely. And to present actual facts instead of a false narrative that demonizes blacks.
 
While the application of police power is hardly equally distributed between urban blacks and suburban whites, the fact is still that most people who are arrested and tried are actually guilty. Poor, urban blacks are far more likely to be arrested in the first place (for using crack, let's say), whereas a white person in a pretty suburb will likely never be caught for using coke. There aren't nearly as many cops on the lookout for white kids using drugs, despite the fact that drug use is actually slightly higher among whites than blacks.

It's fine to be pissed about this, and rightful to be so. But at least correctly understand the problem. Young black males are not being convicted of crimes they have not committed. They are simply far more scrutinized than whites who are committing equivalent crimes. No one is arresting the white kids in the first place, because the public outcry is based on the false notion that drug use is a black thing.

Of course, the answer isn't to simply arrest more white kids. It's to stop with the whole prohibition of drugs nonsense entirely. And to present actual facts instead of a false narrative that demonizes blacks.

One also has to take into account the culture of drug use among lower income areas and higher income areas.
In higher income areas, a drug deal right on the street corner isn't nearly as common as one in a more "private" location... which significantly reduces the chance of being caught, as police can't just kick in doors to check for these things.
However, lets not also forget that higher "drug crime" in lower income areas prompt police responses to calls for service where they respond and discover drug possession in the process of investigating their reason for responding in the first place.

Check out your local larger city police department and see how their patrol divisions are split up.... the areas that solicit a high number of calls for service have significantly smaller response areas than those that have a low call for service frequency. This is so there are more officers close by to respond to these calls. So, in area X in a high crime low income area with high calls for service, a call is placed and an officer responds within 1-5 minutes, whereas in area Y that has a much lower call for service volume, and a larger response area, it may take officers 10-15 minutes (or longer in times of high vehicular traffic) to respond... in that amount of time the incident could be disbursed and officers respond to find .. nothing.
 
11.10.18 the myth of american justice -- that only the guilty get arrested, charged, and incarcerated. More than 846,000 black men were incarcerated in 2008, according to US Bureau of Justice estimates reported by NewsOne. African Americans make up 13.6 percent of the US population according to census data, but black men reportedly make up 40.2 percent of all prison inmates. The arguments and rationalizations that have been trotted out in support of racial exclusion and discrimination in its various forms (e.g. denying colourds citizenship was deemed essential to the formation of the original union) did not form the US into an egalitarian democracy. More black men were disenfranchised due to felony convictions in 2004 than in 1870, "the year the Fifteenth Amendment was ratified prohibiting laws that explicitly deny the right to vote on the basis of race," the number of blacks who are incarcerated has surged, mainly due to a single law enforcement policy... the War on Drugs, a war waged almost exclusively in poor communities of color; ref1 that crime-fighting measure "is a big part of the reason that a black child born today is less likely to be raised by both parents than a black child born during slavery. ref2 Hundreds of thousands of black men have disappeared into prisons and jails, locked away for drug crimes that are largely ignored when committed by whites. The war on drugs has not been aimed at rooting out drug kingpins or violent drug offenders, rather it has been focused overwhelmingly on low-level drug offenses, like marijuana possession -- the very crimes that happen with equal frequency in middle class white communities. In 2005, for example, four out of five drug arrests were for possession and only one out of five were for sales. Most people in state prison for drug offenses have no history of violence or significant selling activity. Nearly 80 percent of the increase in drug arrests in the 1990s -- the period of the most dramatic expansion of the drug war -- was for marijuana possession, a drug less harmful than alcohol or tobacco. In some states, though, negroes have comprised 80 to 90 percent of all drug convictions. This is The New Jim Crow. People of colour are rounded up -- frequently at young ages -- for relatively minor drug offenses, branded felons, and then relegated to a permanent second-class status in which they may be denied the right to vote, automatically excluded from juries, and subjected to legal discrimination in employment, housing, access to education, and public benefits. There are more blacks under correctional control today -- in prison or jail, on probation or parole -- than were enslaved in 1850, a decade before the Civil War began.

Is the purpose of this article to say that black people are not responsible for the crimes tey commit?

The New Jim Crow, sure it is. Blacks are not rounded up. They are engaging in illegal activity and they are caught for it. How is that the fault of the police department?

Why doesn't the article say that blacks should stop commiting crimes to bring downthe prison population?
 
While the application of police power is hardly equally distributed between urban blacks and suburban whites, the fact is still that most people who are arrested and tried are actually guilty. Poor, urban blacks are far more likely to be arrested in the first place (for using crack, let's say), whereas a white person in a pretty suburb will likely never be caught for using coke. There aren't nearly as many cops on the lookout for white kids using drugs, despite the fact that drug use is actually slightly higher among whites than blacks.

There's no racism to it, though. White people get away with it for the most part simply because they buy and sell their drugs inside. Like Caine says, the police can't just go around knocking down doors.
 
blacks have a higher percentage of poverty, single-parent families, drug abuse, not being college grads, not being high school grads, and all the other things that lead to higher rates of crime and incarceration.

our justice system is not responsible for these things; they simply put criminals behind bars.

want to change the environment in which blacks live? call your Congressman.
 
Back
Top Bottom